Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The problem is that HBK WASN'T the face of the company when Austin beat him, Austin was already the face of the company. Austin was clearly the guy the WWE was building around, and that was able to be seen in the summer of 1997. You can't pass a torch to a guy who already has it.
Austin's two matches with Hart, and his feud with Hart, is what got him his notoriety. But, I wouldn't say Hart passed him the torch, he just helped make him famous.
Nobody passed Austin a torch, he just grabbed it and ran.
This is a joke, right? Triple H was a mid-card wrestler who had yet to win anything by the time the Hart/Austin WM match took place. For that matter, I don't even consider WM 13 to be the match that passed the torch from Bret Hart to Steve Austin.
When Bret Hart was out for the latter part of 1996 due to injuries, he hand picked Steve Austin to be his return opponent at Survivor Series 1996. I think this was the sign of the passing of the torch more so than the WM 13 match was.
I believe many of you are failing to understand that a loss doesn't necessarily hurt a career. Austin may have lost to Bret at WM 13, but he came out looking like a legit main eventer who was going to carry the company into the future.
I don't think people are arguing whether his matches with Bret elevated his career or not. Of course they did. But the term "passing the torch" certainly does not mean losing two high profile matches...
Bret pulled Austin up to mainevent status... But he didn't put him over as the number one guy. And as I said before.. The torch wasn't even Brets to give. The number one guy in the business (storywise) at that point was Shawn.. He had beaten Bret twice.. beaten the Undertaker twice.. beaten Sid... destroyed the Hart Foundation.. HBK put Austin over clean in the middle of the ring on the biggest stage of them all and Austin was officially "the man".. the top dog in WWF. If thats not passing the torch I don't know what is..
Austin was already the top dog come WM14, HBK giving him the belt, knowing he had to reitre and the Undertaker forcing him too, didn't make a whole pile of difference in my opinion.
Austin would have been at the top even if he didn't win the title.
He was so over with the crowd it was ridiculous.
There was no doubt that it was Bret who made Austin, elevated him onto Brets level. Anyone can see that. Bret did alot more for Austin than HBK did.
Just put it that way.
Ok the reason Hogan didn't pass the torch was because he knew he was leaving and it would've looked bad to have a face Bret Hart beat the legendary Hulk Hogan cleanly nor did Hogan want to lose that way to anyone else. He should've lost the belt to Yokozuna and passed the torch through yoko but he couldn't even do that. Really Bret had the torch passed through the other legend in the WWE Ric Flair as soon as Bret won the title from Ric he had the torch because to be the man you have to beat the man. Ric had only fought Hogan one time in the WWE because WWE didn't ever want to give the fans that match right away. Flair did beat Savage who had been in the WWE a decade and had become a 2 time champion in his own right.
So really if you want to talk about who had the torch pre austin it was between HBK and Bret, Bret had given Shawn his spot in the main event, but many feel like he got conned into being a heel because of it. But to say that Hogan never passed the torch to either man so no one gave it to Austin would be a stupid assumption because Hogan wasn't the only main event talent that had been in the WWE.