rayisawesomeness
Pre-Show Stalwart
The question is simple, which feud in the WWE do you think they dropped the ball on and was a huge missed opportunity.
Personally, I gotta go with the Triple H/Cena feuds of 2006 and 2008. I still don't quite understand why they haven't had a feud (against each other with Orton or Michaels being involved) that has lasted longer than a month? I know what you're thinking, "ITZ STALE!!@! THEY RESTLED ORTON AND MICHAELS! ALL THE TIME!@!!!!" but just read and maybe, it'll shed some light on why I think they dropped the ball big time on this one.
Go back to '06 when they had a critically acclaimed match in the main event of WM 22 that lighted the whole wrestling world on fire. They really built the feud amazingly and they really gave the match that "big match" feel to it. Of course, once their match concluded, a rematch was set for WM 23 but after Triple H got injured, that plan was thrown out the window and they met once again in another month long feud at that concluded in another critically acclaimed match at Night of Champions 2008. They then got involved in two forgettable and meaningless matches on Raw and they just totally killed the feud's credibility. ...at least in my opinion.
I don't understand what happened to this feud, it began as the WWE's Mayweather/Pacquaio feud and now it's just totally forgotten. Not only did the two put on great matches, but they drew some damn good PPV buys and ratings for Raw. I think if they had a long and thought out feud that lasted longer than one month, then they could have the ability to put out some great moments.
If you're too lazy to read everything I wrote, then here are the main points on why their feuds were a missed opportunity:
- They delivered some amazing matches.
- The PPV's drew large numbers and the ratings for Raw were great.
- Has the "big match" feel to it.
- The two two biggest names in the business.
Personally, I gotta go with the Triple H/Cena feuds of 2006 and 2008. I still don't quite understand why they haven't had a feud (against each other with Orton or Michaels being involved) that has lasted longer than a month? I know what you're thinking, "ITZ STALE!!@! THEY RESTLED ORTON AND MICHAELS! ALL THE TIME!@!!!!" but just read and maybe, it'll shed some light on why I think they dropped the ball big time on this one.
Go back to '06 when they had a critically acclaimed match in the main event of WM 22 that lighted the whole wrestling world on fire. They really built the feud amazingly and they really gave the match that "big match" feel to it. Of course, once their match concluded, a rematch was set for WM 23 but after Triple H got injured, that plan was thrown out the window and they met once again in another month long feud at that concluded in another critically acclaimed match at Night of Champions 2008. They then got involved in two forgettable and meaningless matches on Raw and they just totally killed the feud's credibility. ...at least in my opinion.
I don't understand what happened to this feud, it began as the WWE's Mayweather/Pacquaio feud and now it's just totally forgotten. Not only did the two put on great matches, but they drew some damn good PPV buys and ratings for Raw. I think if they had a long and thought out feud that lasted longer than one month, then they could have the ability to put out some great moments.
If you're too lazy to read everything I wrote, then here are the main points on why their feuds were a missed opportunity:
- They delivered some amazing matches.
- The PPV's drew large numbers and the ratings for Raw were great.
- Has the "big match" feel to it.
- The two two biggest names in the business.