shattered dreams
Hexagonal Hedonist
I think K4P touches on an interesting distinction when he talks about the wrestling he has grown to enjoy. Enjoyment of prowrestling seems to follow an arc of development where tastes age over time. There is a reason that just about everyone rates what got them started first. What is interesting is trying to compare nostalgia vs what appeals to you now. Not only are you judging different products but you have to find a way to compare the different standards you judged them by.
I am not sure any of our input is especially "valuable" but the only reason I stated it that way was A) because that was my interest and this thread is high in opinion anyway and B) because I thought people that did not like the products responses might essentially all be the same and have little merit to the side discussions. After reading a mix from both sides I'd say all are interesting regardless of preference. It is indeed interesting to see if TNA is actually losing ground by still being around in some odd peoples judgment.
The whole point was why wouldn't I like the answer. Everyone is free to give their opinion.
I did not think you were attempting to derail FWIW. I think it was a misunderstanding in that I essentially wanted everyone to base it on their own personal enjoyment factor. That is why I thought some of the things you listed were irrelevant like mass appeal and viability outside of North America. They could have a ton of, or zero, worldwide viability and it still wouldn't effect a person theoretical enjoyment IMO. I'd also dispute that TNAs production values are going backward, but I might make a thread about these mythic production values later anyway.
Depends what you mean by "establish" but they have traveled some place of interest and have shows in many places. The UK where they can do something like 150,000 viewers each week for impact seems beyond IWC.
It's an interesting topic but I don't care for your stated premise. I think the input of people who dislike TNA is just as valuable as that of those who do.
I am not sure any of our input is especially "valuable" but the only reason I stated it that way was A) because that was my interest and this thread is high in opinion anyway and B) because I thought people that did not like the products responses might essentially all be the same and have little merit to the side discussions. After reading a mix from both sides I'd say all are interesting regardless of preference. It is indeed interesting to see if TNA is actually losing ground by still being around in some odd peoples judgment.
If you don't like the answer, don't ask the question.
The whole point was why wouldn't I like the answer. Everyone is free to give their opinion.
You stated that you didn't want discussions to focus upon ratings, or business considerations, and things like that, so I expanded the parameters beyond such considerations, exactly as you requested.
I did not think you were attempting to derail FWIW. I think it was a misunderstanding in that I essentially wanted everyone to base it on their own personal enjoyment factor. That is why I thought some of the things you listed were irrelevant like mass appeal and viability outside of North America. They could have a ton of, or zero, worldwide viability and it still wouldn't effect a person theoretical enjoyment IMO. I'd also dispute that TNAs production values are going backward, but I might make a thread about these mythic production values later anyway.
As I see it, TNA has yet to even establish themselves to any significant degree outside of North America. Outside of a small cult following, consistently largely of IWC marks, TNA has no presence beyond the confines of North America.
Depends what you mean by "establish" but they have traveled some place of interest and have shows in many places. The UK where they can do something like 150,000 viewers each week for impact seems beyond IWC.