When all is said and done - Edge's place in wrestling history

Slyfox696

Excellence of Execution
He's the Rated R Superstar. He's a 9 time World Champion, and he's won a total of 29 WWE titles. He's a WWE Triple Crown winner. Arguably the greatest heel in the current generation, Edge has made a name for himself feuding with some of the great faces in wrestling today, and earned himself a gimmick of being an ultimate opportunist. He faces some criticism due to his rise to main-event being started by having sex with his best friend's girl, but since being in the main-event, there's no denying he's been a permanent fixture.

When Edge finally hangs up the boots for good, where will he stand in wrestling history? Will wrestling fans look back and consider him the greatest ever? Will he be the record holder of World titles? Will people see him as a "great", but not a "legend"? Will he share the stage with guys like Hulk Hogan and Steve Austin, or just below them with guys like Bret Hart and Ric Flair?

When all is said and done, where will Edge rank in wrestling history?
 
This is a tough one for me to place Edge somewhere. He did carry Smackdown for a while but I wouldn't say he was the top guy in the company as I think that honor went to Cena. He hasn't revolutionized the business like an Austin or a Hogan nor hasn't he transcended wrestling like Cena or the Rock. He's a little overrated to me when it comes to wrestling matches and he is somewhat of a transitional champion to me. I would place him in that third tier with Taker and HHH. He will be remembered but not as fondly as a Flair or Taker might be.
 
Quite Simple. Hes a 4th tier guy.
Yes hes won 9 World Titles and proboby will win more but who cares, how many of those have been legit wins? 1,2, maaaaybe 3, 4 is pushing it, hes a transitional Champ. He gets the belt so that people dont have it too long and so that it can build up the new Face in the Brand stuff like that, he dosnt get the belt Legit that often.
Hes not in the same Money making/Crowd Poping category as Rock and Cena, those two are possibly THE BEST at entertaining the Crowd, Making Money stuff like that.
He is NOT in the same category as Hulk and Austin because people dont Buy/Watch WWE PPVs or watch there Shows to see what Edge does that night like they used to for Hulk and Austin, hes more in the category of Tripz and Bret, the guys who were very good and very popular but thats it, just good crowd pleasures.

And for the record. It goes:
Category 1: The Revolutionarys -- Austin, Hulk
Category 2: The Money Makers -- Cena, Rock
Category 3: The Icons -- Undertaker, Micheals, Flair
Category 4: The "Super"superstars -- Triple H, Bret Hart, EDGE.
 
Right, regardless of his championships being 'legit' or not, there is no denying that Edge is a superstar that not only has shown time and time again that he can have good matches with practically anyone, he is trusted to be in the main event spot at Mania by McMahon. Plus, he has undeniably changed the ladder match for the modern generation, following in HBK's footsteps. When arguing 'legit' title reigns, half the title changes in the last 10 years could be argued.

As far as Edge, its true that he has not made as much money as Cena or the Rock etc, and he has not changed the business as Austin and Hogan did, however I believe that Edge belongs amongst such characters as HBK, Bret Hart, HHH, Undertaker etc. He is over as a heel and has been as a face, he is quality on the mic and plays his role well, whatever required of him - crazy, coward, opportunist, hardcore etc - he can play the part perfectly.

I also think he would be where he is now even if the whole 'triangle' affair happened - he was already Money in the Bank winner by this time so the powers that be wanted him to go up against Cena regardless, the affair simply added a better dimension to his already blossoming character.

Edge = certain Hall of Fame candidate and future 'Icon' in this business.
 
Never bought Edge as a world champ, he was at his best with Christian doing 5 second poses and getting poked fun at by Mick Foley.

As a tag wrestler, doing mainly gimmick matches he was good, I'll even accept him as an ok IC champ (when it meant something), but he is no world champ.

He was in the right place at the right time, and basically just hung around in WWE and was a loyal company man, that's why he is a billion time world Champion, if it hadn't of been for WWE farming out a lot of it's aging stars to TNA I can't imagine Edge would ever had a chance at the main belts.

In my opinion he is a 5th tier guy at best.
 
When all is said and done, where will Edge rank in wrestling history?

It all depends. There will be two schools on Edge, I'm quite sure.

1) Edge was horrible! He got to where he was with cheap heat! All he did was fuck Lita, then suck a bit, then join up with Vickie to get more heat! He's made a career out of being a douchebag or riding off of a better heel's coattails.

2) Edge was good at what he did. Sure, he might have used "cheap heat" to get to where he was. Only thing is, what does it matter? Heat is heat, doesn't matter if the crowd hates you because you fuck another guy's girl or because you punt a dude in the face. They hate you, and that's your job.

I subscribe to the 2nd school, I do.

Edge will be below Orton in the "getting people to hate you" arena though. Edge can't resist the cool heel joke pop, while Orton has fought to make everything about his character feed the face cheers. It's not his fault people still pop for asinine reasons, like punting an old man in the head.
 
At the moment, I put him as a second tier star, but with the inevitable face turn upon his return, I will reserve complete judgement. The all time greats are generally recognized for their work as a face. I'm curious as to what kind of draw he could be as a face, seeing how his past face runs were while he was in his mid card days. He may flop as a ME face, but I think if successful, it will possibly put him in the top tier. Either way, he's a surefire Hall of Famer.
 
Considering the sheer rate at which Edge is acquiring world titles, he's bound to break Flair's "official" record of 16 (although it's really more like 20) if he can make it a few more years. The biggest thing holding Edge back will be with his advancing age and accumulation of major injuries, he may want to step back toward a more relaxed role, which would mean fewer or no house shows, which would essentially mean no more world titles, or not very many, maybe one or two more. It's really incredibly when you consider it - it took the Rock, who was known before Edge for accumulating a ton of titles very quickly, 4 years to acquire 8, while it's taken Edge 3 to acquire 9. If Edge continues to consistently main event at the same schedule he has been, it's entirely possible he'll break 16. If not, he'll still be remembered for the fastest accumulation of more world titles than anyone else.

The greatest ever is not a moniker most will place around Edge, but I think he will certainly deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as the greatest heels ever. He's one of the more engaging heels in history, and has provided a number of great, entertaining, and long term storylines. He'll also have to be remembered for his contributions to rescuing the WWF tag team division from its rather abysmal state before the rise of his era's tag teams, of which Edge & Christian are considered by many the best. Obviously, that's hugely arguable, but their contributions aren't.

I think, in the end, Edge is certainly a Hall of Famer (little as that means in reality) and will be remembered by fans as an all time great, but he'll rank alongside men like Bret Hart or Shawn Michaels - men that were a huge part of, and at times, carried, their promotion, but never "took it to new levels" or "revolutionized" it, as did a Hogan or an Austin.
 
Little Jerry Lawler And Rickabod, You Two Are Extremely Wrong, What A Hell Is That????????????? Edge Overrated In Wrestling Matches, You 2 Can Learn Something About "wrestling" And Then Come Back To This Post Please, I Mean, Edge Always Had The Best Match On The Card Ever Since He Became A Main Eventer, Want Prove?

Tlc Vs Undertaker At One Night Stand 2008
Wrestlemania 24 Vs Undertaker
Summerslam 2006 With John Cena
Ladder Match With Jeff Hardy At Extreme Rules

Ok Now You Can Say Ohhhhh Those Are Gimmick Matches, Well Look At This Non Gimmick Amazing Matches

Vs Randy Orton On Raw On April 30, 2007
Vs Undertaker Wm 24
Vs Triple H Great American Bash 08
Vs Jeff Hardy Royal Rumble 09

I Mean You Are Dead Wrong, You're Analizing The Edge Career Inside The Character, Forget About The Character, Think About The Wrestler Himself, Edge Perse, Is Amazing He Can Be Heel Or Face, Gimmick Matches, Non Gimmick Matches, Technique, Speed, Intelligency, Great Sequences, Some Highflyin, High Risk Maneuvers, Heyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!! No Body Wins 9 World Titles For His Name Or Character, It Has Nothing To Do With Fucking Lita! That Helped Yes, To Make Him A Heel Quicker, But It Was Going To Be Like That Any Way.

And About Vickie? Hell I Thought You Knew Something About Booking, It Was Just A Way For Wwe To Make Fans Believe Edge Was Stealing The Title, Just To Help The Character Of Ultimate Opportunist, Sooooooo If Vickie Would Have Not Been There......... There Would Have Been Another Person Or Booking Period!!!!!!!

Edge's Place In History, Ok Not Hogan (in Popularity) Because Edge Is A Hundred Times Better "wrestler" Than Hulk "3 Moves" Hogan But Ok In Popularity And Mainstream Hogan Of Course Is The Man, But As A Wrestler Technically And In Terms Of In Ring Quality Edge Is Way Over Hogan.

But Edge's Place Well Not A Hogan Or Austin In Popularity, But Who Cares? I Mean Just The Fact That Is A Future Hall Of Famer, That Has Won More Titles Than Most Of The Wrestlers In Wwe History And Is No Doubt One Of The Top 5 Heels Of All Time, That's All True!!!!!! So Edge In History

1)ric Flair
2)austin
3)triple H
4)edge
5)undertaker
6)..................any Other Shit.......
 
Little Jerry Lawler And Rickabod, You Two Are Extremely Wrong, What A Hell Is That????????????? Edge Overrated In Wrestling Matches, You 2 Can Learn Something About "wrestling" And Then Come Back To This Post Please, I Mean, Edge Always Had The Best Match On The Card Ever Since He Became A Main Eventer, Want Prove?

Tlc Vs Undertaker At One Night Stand 2008
Wrestlemania 24 Vs Undertaker
Summerslam 2006 With John Cena
Ladder Match With Jeff Hardy At Extreme Rules

Ok Now You Can Say Ohhhhh Those Are Gimmick Matches, Well Look At This Non Gimmick Amazing Matches

Vs Randy Orton On Raw On April 30, 2007
Vs Undertaker Wm 24
Vs Triple H Great American Bash 08
Vs Jeff Hardy Royal Rumble 09

I Mean You Are Dead Wrong, You're Analizing The Edge Career Inside The Character, Forget About The Character, Think About The Wrestler Himself, Edge Perse, Is Amazing He Can Be Heel Or Face, Gimmick Matches, Non Gimmick Matches, Technique, Speed, Intelligency, Great Sequences, Some Highflyin, High Risk Maneuvers, Heyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!! No Body Wins 9 World Titles For His Name Or Character, It Has Nothing To Do With Fucking Lita! That Helped Yes, To Make Him A Heel Quicker, But It Was Going To Be Like That Any Way.

And About Vickie? Hell I Thought You Knew Something About Booking, It Was Just A Way For Wwe To Make Fans Believe Edge Was Stealing The Title, Just To Help The Character Of Ultimate Opportunist, Sooooooo If Vickie Would Have Not Been There......... There Would Have Been Another Person Or Booking Period!!!!!!!

Edge's Place In History, Ok Not Hogan (in Popularity) Because Edge Is A Hundred Times Better "wrestler" Than Hulk "3 Moves" Hogan But Ok In Popularity And Mainstream Hogan Of Course Is The Man, But As A Wrestler Technically And In Terms Of In Ring Quality Edge Is Way Over Hogan.

But Edge's Place Well Not A Hogan Or Austin In Popularity, But Who Cares? I Mean Just The Fact That Is A Future Hall Of Famer, That Has Won More Titles Than Most Of The Wrestlers In Wwe History And Is No Doubt One Of The Top 5 Heels Of All Time, That's All True!!!!!! So Edge In History

1)ric Flair
2)austin
3)triple H
4)edge
5)undertaker
6)..................any Other Shit.......

Can you be so sure that Edge was going to be a great heel without Lita? In no way shape of form is Edge over Hogan. I guess you haven't watched Hogan's early work but he was a great technical wrestler and he entertained the fans better than Edge so he is a better pro wrestler than Edge.

Edge would be lucky to crack the top five in terms of greatest heels and I find it laughable you place Flair #1 and Austin #2 because Hogan is better than all the wrestlers you just listed.
 
Who Cares About Revolutionizing The Industry? Being The Best Means Revolution Of A Company? Nooooo! Being The Best Means Having The World Title And In The Last 3-4 Years Edge Has Been The Man, So Edge Is Amazing..

Transitional Champion? I Dont Think So, Hey If A Company Tells Me I'll Be A 9 Time World Champion And That It Is Considered A "transitional Champion" I Will Answer Yes Immediately, Because That's Not A Transitional Champion Shit!!!!!! 9 Times Proves Is Not Joke, Is Not Fluke, Is Not Transitional, That Proves Hes' The Man!

Who Said That To Be The Best You Have To Have The Title For 1 Year? Or 2 Years? Or 6 Months, Hey Some Great Stars Have Not Have The Gold For So Long And Have Been The Best, Ric Flair For Example, He Had Some Reigns That Were Short, And Anyway He's A 16 Time World Champion! Soooo......

Let Me Tell You I Prefer 9 Reigns Of 2, 1 Or Less Months, Than 1 Or 2 Of 6 Months And 1 Year Believe Me!

Maybe Wwe Asked Edge How He Wanted His World Title Reigns To Be... That Could Happen, Maybe They Told Him, We Can Give You 3 Reigns Of 4 Or 5 Months And That's It, Or 8 Or 9 Reigns Shorter, And He Took The 8-9 Reigns As His Decision So That's Not Bad, His Phenomenal!!!!!!!!!

Hahahahhahahahahahahah Are You Kidding Me? Little Jerry Lawler, I Mean, Hogan Is A Crap, Watch Wrestlemania 3, That's The Worst Match In History, Im Talking In Technical And Sequencial Terms Of A Match, Because Historically It May Be The Most Important One, That's Ok...but Men In Technique And In Ring Quality Edge Is Way Better Than Him!, Edge Does 1000 Moves In A Match, Hogan? Hogan Takes All The Bumps (just Like Cena) And Then Hits The Punches, Then The Big Boot, A Stupid Leg Drop And That's All He Wrestles!!!!!! Whoahhhhhhhhh Incredible How Entertaining Is Hogan Yeahhhhhhh, But Edge? Edge Makes A Sleeper Hold, Neckbreaker, Spinning Heel Kick, Standing Drop Kicking, Missile Dropkick, Ddt, Impaler Ddt, Reverse Ddt, Punches, Kicks, Mat Slam, Clothesline, Roll Up, School Boy, And Ohhhh Spear!!!!!! If You Know How To Count You May See That Edge Has Way More Moves Than Hogan, Let Me See???? Mhhhhhh Hogan =3 Edge =10000, Or More! Ahahahah So That's It

And Little Jerry Lawler One More Thing, Hogan Is An Egotistical, Bullshit Guy Who Just Cared For Him And Because Of Him Several Great Superstars Were Never Wwf Champions, And In Wcw He Made The Same, And Look What Happened Wcw Doesn't Exists Anymore!!!!!!!

Ric Flair Is The Man!!!!! The Greatest Wrestler Of All Time!!!!!!!!! Period, 16 World Titles, With The Best Mic Work The Best In Ring Work, The Talent The Charisma, The Passion And Determination To Overcome A Plane Crash That Almost Killed Him And All Of That, While Hogan? He's An Egotistical 3 Moves Wrestler, What A Shit!!!!!!!!
 
Who Cares About Revolutionizing The Industry? Being The Best Means Revolution Of A Company? Nooooo! Being The Best Means Having The World Title And In The Last 3-4 Years Edge Has Been The Man, So Edge Is Amazing..

Transitional Champion? I Dont Think So, Hey If A Company Tells Me I'll Be A 9 Time World Champion And That It Is Considered A "transitional Champion" I Will Answer Yes Immediately, Because That's Not A Transitional Champion Shit!!!!!! 9 Times Proves Is Not Joke, Is Not Fluke, Is Not Transitional, That Proves Hes' The Man!

Who Said That To Be The Best You Have To Have The Title For 1 Year? Or 2 Years? Or 6 Months, Hey Some Great Stars Have Not Have The Gold For So Long And Have Been The Best, Ric Flair For Example, He Had Some Reigns That Were Short, And Anyway He's A 16 Time World Champion! Soooo......

Let Me Tell You I Prefer 9 Reigns Of 2, 1 Or Less Months, Than 1 Or 2 Of 6 Months And 1 Year Believe Me!

Maybe Wwe Asked Edge How He Wanted His World Title Reigns To Be... That Could Happen, Maybe They Told Him, We Can Give You 3 Reigns Of 4 Or 5 Months And That's It, Or 8 Or 9 Reigns Shorter, And He Took The 8-9 Reigns As His Decision So That's Not Bad, His Phenomenal!!!!!!!!!

Revolutionizing the business has something to do with your place in history so that's a part in why Hogan and Austin are much more revered than others. So I guess you prefer winning the championship one month than lose it the next. How are we supposed to take you seriously as a champ if you can't hold the title for a month.
 
Because He Can Hold It More Than A Month Men!!! He's Had 3 Months Reings !!!!! Ahahhaah.

The Only Way To Seize The Quality Of A Champion Is Not Only The Duration Of A Single Reign,,,,,, You Can Also Count The Duration Of All His Reigns And If You Count Let Me See, 1,2,3,4,5,6,,7,8,9, Well He's Had 9 Amazing Reigns In Just 3 Years So He's The Only One In History To Win Such Quantity Of Titles In Such A Short Time. And Since 2006 To The Present Non Have Won More Gold Than Edge, That Means He's The Best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Well Rickabod, Yeah You May Have Stated Your Opinion Could Be Wrong, Well You Were Right, Your Opinion Was Wrong!!!! Ahahahaahaha

You See Why Edge Is So Good?

*mic Skills
*in Ring Skills
*best Match On The Card
*plays The Heel Amazingly
*is Better Than, Hogan (technically In Ring Work) I'm Not Saying Most Important To Wrestling History Nor Better Crowd Drawer Just In The Ring
*
 
Because He Can Hold It More Than A Month Men!!! He's Had 3 Months Reings !!!!! Ahahhaah.

The Only Way To Seize The Quality Of A Champion Is Not Only The Duration Of A Single Reign,,,,,, You Can Also Count The Duration Of All His Reigns And If You Count Let Me See, 1,2,3,4,5,6,,7,8,9, Well He's Had 9 Amazing Reigns In Just 3 Years So He's The Only One In History To Win Such Quantity Of Titles In Such A Short Time. And Since 2006 To The Present Non Have Won More Gold Than Edge, That Means He's The Best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Edge has not had nine amazing reigns as champion. I'll say that he hasn't had one. Let me give you the short list of who Edge has retained his championship against: Batista, Cena, and Mysterio. I believe that is about it. Every time he wins the title, he basically loses it the next month. Again, winning more titles doesn't make you the best.
 
And 9 World Titles Think About It......... Name 10 Wrestlers Who Have Won More World Titles Than Edge In The History Of Professional Wrestling...... Now Name Them............ You Can't Right?

Because There Are Not 10 Wrestlers With More Than 9 World Titles Because Is An Exclusive Group Of Hall Of Famers Men, You Understand? Just Ric Flair, Triple H, Verne Gagne, Have Won More World Titles Than Edge, Those Are "major" Major Words, That Not Even Austin Or The Rock Can Imagine...... I Never Imagined That Edge One Day Will Have More World Titles Than Guys Like The Rock Or Austin, And He's Had So That's Respect Earned Folks!!!!!!!

Ehhhhhhhhh He's Retained Against Batista (for You Maybe A Good One) Because I Think You Like To Boring Slow Egotistical Wrestlers (hogan, Batista) He's Retained Against Rey Mysterio, The Undertaker (one Of The Best Of All Time) Ehhhhhhhhhhhh Cena!!! You Hogan Successor, Ahahahaha And Ahmmmmm Jeff Hardy And Every Single Peace Of Shit That Has Been Put In His Way Pal!!!!!!

Im Not Saying Edge Is The Best, I Said He's One Of The Best, Ok? That's All

Let Me Torture You A Bit.......ahahhahaha

Remember Hogan How Stupid He Looked Like When He Entered The Wcw Arena Trying To Play A Guitar? With The Bullshit Of Nash And Hall And Bischoff Behind Him? I'll Be Embarrassed If I Had A Superstar Like That As My Selection Of The Best Of All Time Ahhahahaha. And Then When Goldberg Took Him Up In Georgia Dome In 1998 And Beat The Crap Out Of His Ass With The Jackhammer? Im Sure You Remember

Ok Edge Hasn't Had Any Reing? Uuuuuuuuhmmmmmmm I Dont Think So, I Think Edge Beat Cena And Rvd On Raw For The Wwe Title And Held It For 3 Months, And Then Beat Undertaker And Became The Man Again And Beat Batista 3 Months In A Row, Something That No Body Had Done Like That In The Past, Beating Him In The Cage, And In 2 Amazing Matches In 2007, I Think He Beat Cena In Last Man Standing At Backlash 09 And Won The Gold, I Think Those Are Reigns.......at Least Well Earned Surpassing Life Threatening Injuries And Actually Having A Match, Not Like Hogan Who Won The Title In 20 Seconds At Wrestlemania 9 By Just Hitting A Leg Drop On Yokozuna That's A Joke!!!!!!!!!!
 
And 9 World Titles Think About It......... Name 10 Wrestlers Who Have Won More World Titles Than Edge In The History Of Professional Wrestling...... Now Name Them............ You Can't Right?

Because There Are Not 10 Wrestlers With More Than 9 World Titles Because Is An Exclusive Group Of Hall Of Famers Men, You Understand? Just Ric Flair, Triple H, Verne Gagne, Have Won More World Titles Than Edge, Those Are "major" Major Words, That Not Even Austin Or The Rock Can Imagine...... I Never Imagined That Edge One Day Will Have More World Titles Than Guys Like The Rock Or Austin, And He's Had So That's Respect Earned Folks!!!!!!!

Ehhhhhhhhh He's Retained Against Batista (for You Maybe A Good One) Because I Think You Like To Boring Slow Egotistical Wrestlers (hogan, Batista) He's Retained Against Rey Mysterio, The Undertaker (one Of The Best Of All Time) Ehhhhhhhhhhhh Cena!!! You Hogan Successor, Ahahahaha And Ahmmmmm Jeff Hardy And Every Single Peace Of Shit That Has Been Put In His Way Pal!!!!!!

Im Not Saying Edge Is The Best, I Said He's One Of The Best, Ok? That's All

True I can't name 10 wrestlers who have won more titles than Edge but you can't name me 10 wrestler who have lost more titles than Edge.

Kurt Angle has won more world titles than Edge so you forgot him and it's so much easier to win titles when there are two rather than one. Edge has never retained the title in an one-on-one matchup so you need to check your facts on that one. I forgot about Judgment Day so that's one mistake which is still less than yours. Edge may have more titles than Rock and Austin but he is still behind those two by most wrestling fans.
 
At The End

Hogan In The Ring= Shit

Edge In The Ring= Incredible

Hogan As A Draw= Maybe The Best In History

Edge As A Draw= A Good One In This Period Of Time In Wrestling History

That's All Im Saying Edge Is Better Wrestler And More Entertaining, Hogan Is The Actor, Egotistical Guy Who Simply Draw Crowds And For That He Had The Title Not For His Talent.

I Prefere To Be Given The Title For My Work For Years And My Wrestling Talent Than Been Given The Title Because A Stupid Crowd Applauds Me!!!!!!!!!
 
Ok Edge Hasn't Had Any Reing? Uuuuuuuuhmmmmmmm I Dont Think So, I Think Edge Beat Cena And Rvd On Raw For The Wwe Title And Held It For 3 Months, And Then Beat Undertaker And Became The Man Again And Beat Batista 3 Months In A Row, Something That No Body Had Done Like That In The Past, Beating Him In The Cage, And In 2 Amazing Matches In 2007, I Think He Beat Cena In Last Man Standing At Backlash 09 And Won The Gold, I Think Those Are Reigns.......at Least Well Earned Surpassing Life Threatening Injuries And Actually Having A Match, Not Like Hogan Who Won The Title In 20 Seconds At Wrestlemania 9 By Just Hitting A Leg Drop On Yokozuna That's A Joke!!!!!!!!!!

1. Edge beat RVD and Cena for the title and held it for two months, not three.

2. The reason he beat the Undertaker because he was injured so they decided to have Edge take the belt from here.

3. Let's all thank the Big Show for Edge winning that title.

4. I don't know why you hate Hogan so much but his matches have been better and are more remembered than Edge. Hogan > Edge and that's all there is to it.
 
Ahahhaahah You Saw? Ahhhhhh Hey Kurt Angle Has Not Been Better Than Edge? Winning The Tna Title Is A Joke That's A World Title???????? Ahahahaha Reallly???????????????

And Edge Has Retained The Title In Very Good One On One Matches Pal, You're Talking To The # 1 Edge Fan You Can't Discuss Facts With Me!!!! Look At This

*retained In One On One Against Jeff At Judgment Day 09
*retained In One On One Against Cena Summerslam 06
*retained In One On One Against Batista Inisde The Steel Cage One Night Stand 08, Against Batista At Judgment Day 2007 And Batista At Night Of Champions 2007
*retained In One On One Against Rey Mysterio Royal Rumble 2008 And No Way Out

Hey The One Who Needs To Check His Facts Is You Men!
 
At The End

Hogan In The Ring= Shit

Edge In The Ring= Incredible

Hogan As A Draw= Maybe The Best In History

Edge As A Draw= A Good One In This Period Of Time In Wrestling History

That's All Im Saying Edge Is Better Wrestler And More Entertaining, Hogan Is The Actor, Egotistical Guy Who Simply Draw Crowds And For That He Had The Title Not For His Talent.

I Prefere To Be Given The Title For My Work For Years And My Wrestling Talent Than Been Given The Title Because A Stupid Crowd Applauds Me!!!!!!!!!

Hogan his plenty of talent than Edge has. I take it that you haven't watched many Hogan matches in your day because if you did, you wouldn't be posting this badly. Hogan was just as good in the ring as Edge was and his three move or five move stuff that you spew is so erroneous that it needs not to be said. It doesn't matter how many moves you have. It's how you work the crowd and entertain them during the course of a match and Hogan simply does it better than Edge.
 
with a further risk of another email.....I am not sure my opinion can be wrong, you can disagree with it fine as I am with yours but thats about it.

Edge was better as a tag team wrestler, because that was about his level.
He cannot carry a decent match unless its high risk or gimmick based.

Everyone one of the matches you list as 'Edge classics' (with the possible exception of Cena) where against better wrestlers and workers.

In terms of originality, Edge has pretty much zero going for him.

When he debuted he was a rip off of Raven without the promo work, then he was thrown together with Christain and Gangrel - the best thing that had going for it was Gangrel's music and entrance.

Then he was turned into one half of a comedy duo, with Christain getting all the laughs.

His signature moves are a spear stolen from Goldberg, a DDT stolen from Gangrel, and does he still use that weird Scorpion death lock?

As for his mic skills, better than some but overall un-engaging and mildy boring, the whole Vickie storyline was boring and a just riffed on of so many others (HHH and Stephanie to name but one).

On the plus side, I have enjoyed most of his entrance music over the years, but I tend to turn off his matches after that.
 
Ahahhaahah You Saw? Ahhhhhh Hey Kurt Angle Has Not Been Better Than Edge? Winning The Tna Title Is A Joke That's A World Title???????? Ahahahaha Reallly???????????????

And Edge Has Retained The Title In Very Good One On One Matches Pal, You're Talking To The # 1 Edge Fan You Can't Discuss Facts With Me!!!! Look At This

*retained In One On One Against Jeff At Judgment Day 09
*retained In One On One Against Cena Summerslam 06
*retained In One On One Against Batista Inisde The Steel Cage One Night Stand 08, Against Batista At Judgment Day 2007 And Batista At Night Of Champions 2007
*retained In One On One Against Rey Mysterio Royal Rumble 2008 And No Way Out

Hey The One Who Needs To Check His Facts Is You Men!

You're not Edge's #1 fan believe me on that. You'll know if you are able to stick around here which I highly doubt.

By my recollection, TNA is a wrestling promotion. Are world titles restricted to the WWE because they are not. The TNA Heavyweight title counts as a world title as well and Angle has more world titles than Edge.
 
Edge would be lucky to crack the top five in terms of greatest heels and I find it laughable you place Flair #1 and Austin #2 because Hogan is better than all the wrestlers you just listed.

Edge is a better wrestler than Hulk Hogan could have ever dreamt of being. Hogan made the WWF....true. But Hogan was the 10th best wrestler on the roster, even in the late 80's at the peak of Hulkamania. Lou Thesz said it himself....Hogan couldn't wrestle an inch.

Edge is not in the discussion of top 10 superstars ever because he doesn't have the crowning moment the big names do. But Edge is a surefire Hall of Famer.

Hogan could never have beaten Stone Cold Steve Austin in any sort of match, except maybe a pose off. Hogan=Overrated.
 
I Hate Hogan Because Been A Shit In The Ring He Always Had The Title Just Because He Drew Crowdsssss Whoahhhhhhhhhhhh, While Some Amazing Wrestlers Like Ricky Steamboat And Many More Never Were Wwe Champions Because The Shit Of Hogan Had The Title!!!!!!!

Show me concrete proof that Hogan had something to do with Steamboat not having any world titles and maybe I take your posts seriously.

I take it to believe that if you drew crowds and kept the crowd entertained that you deserve to hold the title. I mean if you have the title and don't draw crowds, why do you deserve to hold the title. Edge is not as draw as many people think he is because whenever he fights against Cena, Batista, HHH, or Taker, mostly everybody comes to see those superstars rather than Edge.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,849
Messages
3,300,882
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top