Sorry to burst your bubble, but its not 1990 and the Goldust character is a fucking washed up has been and the shit was boring as hell to watch. People would walk out of the building if a random match such as Goldust vs Matt Hardy was a PPV match....are you serious with your response? This is not 20 years ago and there is 6 hours of wrestling a week including a PPV a month. Do you think Matt Hardy vs Goldust is going to improve ratings or even satisfy fans who follow the WWE weekly? Hell to the no. It was a filler throw in match, and Goldust is a jobber now.
The only way I would mark out for Goldust is if he broke kayfabe and lit himself on fire on live television.
Now when UT/HBK @ WM 25 went down, I marked out the whole match.
Even though you didn't address this to me, I'm going to chime in.
Matt Hardy vs the current Goldust would draw nothing.
However, do I think that the ORIGINAL Goldust would produce ratings and capture people's attentions more, which was what the person you were responding to was implying? Absolutely.
I'm going to make a bold statement, so people can feel free to agree or disagree.
But it is the characters that actually are the ones that produce the ratings, as well as good angles and stories that appeal to the viewers. Not the quality of wrestling itself.
The quality of WWE wrestling is the highest it has ever been in the history of the company. And they are still putting a ridiculous amount of stress on the students in their Developmental League. However, it isn't the quality of wrestling that needs WWE's attention. It's the Creative Department that needs the attention.
Today's modern fans got what they wanted and the wrestling has improved two-fold from a decade ago. Great (sarcastic). So what does WWE get as the finished result? Lower ratings, lower attendance, and lower PPV buyrates compared to a decade ago. That should tell WWE and its modern day fans that are loyal to the company that it IS NOT the quality of wrestling that draws people in to watch the product. It is the quality of the story-writing and the creativity of the characters that do. And to modern day fans who like today's product, I am sorry .... no offense to you .... today's storytelling, today's angles, and today's characters absolutely suck, for the most part.
With that being said, could the Goldust of today wrestle a 4 star match? No, it's not going to happen. However, the real question is ... "in the big scheme of things, is that even important?" Or is a 2 or 2 1/2 star match from him good enough? I think someone who wrestles a 2 or a 2 1/2 star match as the norm, is good enough, AS LONG as he has a good character that can draw.
He could, however, by returning to his original character and working a successful program with a key fan favorite produce ratings. Absolutely.