Now ya'll can choose to answer as if I was just asking about Stone Cold or The Rock but it kind've goes hand in hand.
TBH, I feel that if those two hadn't had to leave the wrestling business we would probably still be going on with the attitude era right now, and combined with HHH, they were pretty much the 3 brightest biggest stars to come out of the WWF during that time, and HHH is still probably the biggest star in the company.
In the long term view of things, both The Rocks and Stone Colds stays at the top were very short in comparison to your typical stars such as Hogan/Savage/Flair/Sting, I mean pretty much every star ever had atLEAST a ten year stay at the top, as HHH has had now, Stone Cold and The Rock were supposed to be a part of that.
I feel like I started to really hate HHH precisely because there was never a face on his level to trade with him. Stone Cold always had a bunch of great heels to feud with, when he was a heel the Rock always had Stone Cold or Mankind or HHH himself. There was no brandsplit at the time so there was no talent dilution and of course there was always you're mainstay in The Undertaker.
By the time Trips had become truly dominant The Rock had moved on to Hollywood, Stone Cold had become too incapacitated, the brand split hit(and for some reason Angle and UT were always kept seperated from HHH), and there was never someone that HHH could really call his rival or his equal, and it should've been one of those two.(and y'know what the Brand split should've never happened, or Raw should've remained the CLEAR #1 show, I'll have to comment that on the next brand split thread someone makes).
So what do you guys think, would the Attitude Era still be going strong today? Would the brand split have happened? Would it have been conceived differently? Would HHH still have dominated the new millenium? Could the WWE still have gone PG and stayed true to two of their biggest stars? I always thought that it would take one of those three going to TNA to really help that company(all due respect to your Christians, and Angles who just aren't on the same level) and I feel Stone Cold might've tried TNA out at one point if he'd gotten genuinely unhappy with the WWE. What do you all think?
EDIT: I now know there's a somehwat similar thread on this same page but I think this is asking a different question and going to get different answers.
TBH, I feel that if those two hadn't had to leave the wrestling business we would probably still be going on with the attitude era right now, and combined with HHH, they were pretty much the 3 brightest biggest stars to come out of the WWF during that time, and HHH is still probably the biggest star in the company.
In the long term view of things, both The Rocks and Stone Colds stays at the top were very short in comparison to your typical stars such as Hogan/Savage/Flair/Sting, I mean pretty much every star ever had atLEAST a ten year stay at the top, as HHH has had now, Stone Cold and The Rock were supposed to be a part of that.
I feel like I started to really hate HHH precisely because there was never a face on his level to trade with him. Stone Cold always had a bunch of great heels to feud with, when he was a heel the Rock always had Stone Cold or Mankind or HHH himself. There was no brandsplit at the time so there was no talent dilution and of course there was always you're mainstay in The Undertaker.
By the time Trips had become truly dominant The Rock had moved on to Hollywood, Stone Cold had become too incapacitated, the brand split hit(and for some reason Angle and UT were always kept seperated from HHH), and there was never someone that HHH could really call his rival or his equal, and it should've been one of those two.(and y'know what the Brand split should've never happened, or Raw should've remained the CLEAR #1 show, I'll have to comment that on the next brand split thread someone makes).
So what do you guys think, would the Attitude Era still be going strong today? Would the brand split have happened? Would it have been conceived differently? Would HHH still have dominated the new millenium? Could the WWE still have gone PG and stayed true to two of their biggest stars? I always thought that it would take one of those three going to TNA to really help that company(all due respect to your Christians, and Angles who just aren't on the same level) and I feel Stone Cold might've tried TNA out at one point if he'd gotten genuinely unhappy with the WWE. What do you all think?
EDIT: I now know there's a somehwat similar thread on this same page but I think this is asking a different question and going to get different answers.