If it was a midcarder without the strong mic reputation, I would agree with you guys. But, when it's the Rock, with his reputation on the mic, the standards have to be higher. I didn't see Punk's notes, if he had notes when he did his shoot promo, I would be disappointed in that too. I just didn't see them...
A Rock promo is simply expected to be better than just about anyone else's, simply because it's a Rock promo. Is that completely fair? Of course not. But, Dwayne Johnson is the reason that bar has been set so high in the first place, because he was BRILLIANT 10 years ago. No matter what happened, no matter what unexpected thing was said, the Rock could improvise and just roll with it. When did he forget how to do that? If he forgot a talking point then, he would make a new one up, and chances are, it ended up being better than what he planned anyway.
The Rock has the talent to do it better, doesn't he? I guess it's like the difference between an actor like Robert DeNiro delivering a wooden, boring performance and someone like Hayden Christensen doing the same. With Hayden, you know he is a lousy actor anyway, so you just don't care. But because DeNiro has such a strong reputation as an actor, you expect him to maintain that level of excellence, even in crap films...When he ends up in a movie like Righteous Kill, with Al Pacino, another guy who has the highest expectations placed on him, and they deliver a total dud, they get excoriated for it. Not because the performance was lackluster in and of itself, but because it was DeNiro and Pacino delivering the lackluster performances. When you raise the bar that high, because of your own previous body of work, you are expected to maintain it. Rock didn't.