Gee, and I thought it was people who judge others that should be ashamed of themselves. Silly me.
You're probably a nice guy, but I don't agree with your decision to smoke drugs.
So if you like the drug it's ok, but if you don't then the users should be ashamed of themselves? You are a judgmental hypocrite.
Caffeine is harmless. Alcohol is a different story, and I'm not pro alcohol either, by the way. People that get drunk every weekend just for the sake of it or because "it's cool" should be ashamed of themselves.
Then you should definitely talk shit to everyone who does.
You've yet to give me a good reason on why smoking weed is so great. That hungry stuff is a load of crap. It's a pathetic reason to smoke it.
I think you can answer this on your own.
No, I can't. Because it doesn't accomplish anything great, if your smoking it because you like it.
What a bad reason to like something. Food makes people feel happier, and so does being with family. We should outlaw those too.
Does food and seeing family have dangerous side effects? I think not. And didn't you say that
you smoke it because it makes you feel happier? Now you're calling it a lame reason to like something, so now look who's the hypocrite.
The only reason anything has died from weed is because it injested 60 joints in an hour. It was a monkey. And it suffocated.
And you have this amazing ability to determine how many people have died from smoking it, do you?
But chemicals that cause cancer, like sweet n low should be? In a free society you don't need a reason to make something legal. You do need a reason to make a law against something. Do you know what reason Harry J. Anslinger used to make weed illegal? Black jazz musicians liked it, smoked it, made awesome music that white people liked. Then those black guys had sex with white girls. That was deemed dangerous to society. In all reality, it wasn't weed that was deemed harmful, it was jazz. So, we should outlaw rock n' roll and the trombone, the true banes of society.
I don't know how to reply to this, because jazz music has nothing to do with the topic we are discussing.
And any chemical that causes cancer shouldn't be legal.
I use it to relax on weekends. I could drink some wine, but that could give me liver disease. Weed on the other hand, makes me want chips. I think I'll take chips over cirrhosis. But that's just me.
So instead of seeing friends or having a good time, you use the illegal aid of weed to relax on weekends. I'm sure there are many other things that can help you to relax. Here are the short term effects of weed:
Short-term effects of marijuana include problems with memory and learning, distorted perception (sights, sounds, time, touch), trouble with thinking and problem solving, loss of motor coordination, increased heart rate, and anxiety.These effects are even greater when other drugs are mixed with weed. A user may also experience dry mouth and throat.
That's from a proper health website, so it is legitimate. I'd say weed is more harmful than alcohol.
I do think about them when I do charity work for the Salvation Army, or when I donate to the children's hospital, or the MDA telethon. Come to think of it, I wouldn't be home to donate to MDA if I wasn't high.
You're missing the point here. I'm saying that you obviously think you don't have an "easy" life so you smoke weed to relax. Yet, these poor people have absolutely nothing. Meaning, they have it much worse than you, and you still think your life is so bad.
Unless it's alcohol or caffeine, right?
No, nobody should need to turn any drug to make their lives happier. And once again, caffeine is harmless.
So getting high, lighting some candles and making sweet tender love to the woman I love is a bad thing? Wow, maybe I should go skateboard and skin my knees. Or go to a concert and feel crowded. Nah, I'll stay home, get high, play Tony Hawk, listen to a CD, and have sex. Sounds better to me.
If your life is so interesting, why do you need to relax? Can't you do all that other stuff without smoking weed?
You're right. No one should do anything because it's cool. But what about if you just like it?
So if you like shooting or killing someone, it's fine is it? Weed is illegal, because it does have dangerous side effects. Alcohol isn't illegal yet for some unknown reason, apart from the amount of money the government makes off it.
And with my analyst job, my good relationship with my family, and stable finances I am fucked up how?
Then why do you need to relax and why do you need to smoke weed?
I don't think anyone sits around, sparks a doob and says, "Today, I am going to condemn myself to a life of Pizza Hut."
Why am I even bothering to reply to this post.
If you feel this way, take every piece of music you own, and throw it out. Because the great ones got high when they had a problem, and then wrote or played what came to them. Eric Clapton is obviously weak, fucked up, broke, and empty. Either that, or he is having a three way with two models while snorting cocaine off of their nipples. For every Amy Whinehouse or Robert Downey Jr., there is an Eric Clapton, George Carlin, etc.
Famous people that do drugs are very idiotic. They have it better than everyone else, yet they seem to always want more or want a better life. They can never be happy. So because famous people do it, people want to follow suit? Is that what your implying?
You're an idiot, weed is prescribed as medication. I'll go tell cancer patients that Rusty said they are weak and cowardly. You know, radiation and chemo usually make a person weak because it kills their appetite. Smoking a joint can usually make them hungry, which helps them fight through the side effects with some sustenance. That makes you heal faster.
You're missing my point once again. Smoking weed just because you like it or because it makes you hungrier is ridiculous. But if a doctor recommends it and allows a patient to use the drug to help get over their physical problems including cancer, then it's fine. See the difference? These people actually need it in order to survive, you obviously don't.
Or jazz music. Or because it's completely nontaxable. The government doesn't like people having fun unless they get a cut. And I am not some anti-government anarchist, I am a realist. There have been no long term side effects of pot discovered, except for a lowered sperm count, and since you don't want these people to reproduce, I think you can live with that. You cannot get cancer from weed. You don't even lose motivation. You just realize that the shit you had to do was never really that important.
Marijuana long term effects: Marijuana smoke contains some of the same cancer-causing compounds as tobacco, sometimes in higher concentrations. Studies show that someone who smokes five joints per week may be taking in as many cancer-causing chemicals as someone who smokes a full pack of cigarettes every day.
There is no
good reason to smoke weed for enjoyment purposes. And I do want people to reproduce so I don't want them smoking weed. You're not making much sense.
Right, I agree. Harmful drugs are terrible. Alcohol gives you liver disease. Alcohol is the only drug that has withdraw symptoms that become deadly. That's right, if an alcoholic quits cold turkey, he can die because the part of the brain it affects works harder when your sober, and it can overload, causing a brain hemorrhage. Not even heroin addicts can die from withdraw. But, hey, weed is bad, and according to you.
All "harmful" (notice that word?) drugs are bad for the human body. I am not a fan of alcohol and I am well aware of it's effects, but weed is obviously worse than alcohol. One beer doesn't make you have anxiety problems and severe loss of coordination, but weed does. Many beers can cause a problem, but in moderation, alcohol isn't very harmful.
You may just want to rethink that comment.