Never said I liked Foley better. Haven't ever thought about who I like better between these two. Seems downright logical to me. Seems like all those guys are getting through but I don't think of the gimmick matches when I think of the others. I see. The point of the gimmicks are to try to find a way to actually prevent the greatest from winning the tournament to determine the greatest. That's somehow more honorable than me voting Foley over Benoit. Foley was the first real threat to Taker and has beaten him a few times. He's also defeated Triple H and Steve Austin. It's not like Benoit has a stellar record either. Outside his five month title reign he's lost quite a bit too. Really? Because your first post in this thread made it seem like you thought this match would be really close. Almost like you were trying to find a way to justify a Benoit victory. Now that Benoit is losing you're becoming angry. Are you sure favoritism isn't playing a part in your posts here? I'm not so sure that Benoit is a superior in ring worker to Foley. What? Benoit is considered to be one of the greatest technical wrestlers ever. What does that mean? He's better at executing a suplex? Why is a technical mat wrestler automatically considered a better performer than a brawler? People here look their nose down at brawlers for some reason. Foley is considered to be one of the greatest brawlers. So tell me why the technical wrestler automatically gets the win over the brawler.