I wasn't surprised, just disappointed. Let's look at the 4 criteria that was supposedly used in the judging.
1. Win/Loss Record: This was Heath Slater. He was undefeated and the only undefeated person on the show.
2. Strength of Opponent: Ok I'll give this to Daniel. He fought two former world champions in the Great Khali and Chris Jericho.
3. Dedication and work ethic: I'm leaning towards Slater and Justin Gabriel for this. If you listen to Bryan's interviews, not sure if they are shoots or part of the show, it sounds like he feels that NXT and being mentored by the Miz, which I believe is a great idea, is below him. Look at Slater, Christian gives him advice and he follows it. Gabriel seems to be listening to Matt Hardy.
4. The "It" Factor: I have to give this to Gabriel. Did you hear that applause that he received at the rookie battle royal. The crowd gave him not only the longest but the loudest cheer out of the all the rookies,including Bryan. Yes Bryan is a great wrestler technical wise, but then so was Charlie Haas. WWE isn't looking at a wrestler who is a great technical guy to be their top star. If that was true, then Shelton Benjamin would be the World Heavyweight champion. John Cena is a multi time WWE champion and noone is going to declare him to be a great technically sound wrestler. Now I know some are going to say, well Jericho is a good technical wrestler and he was world champion, yes but he also has the ability to make the crowd despise his existance. Bryan when it comes to the charisma is dull to the casual wrestling fan that the WWE tries to get. He may have been trained by Shawn Michaels, but he has nowhere near Michaels inring charisma. Hell he doesn't even have Squire Dave Taylor's charisma.
So going by that, I would say that you can give the top two spots to Slater or Gabriel, doesn't matter which order