Using Santino to build up the Morrison vs Sheamus feud has been a masterstroke.

Truthfully, I think the build up for a Morrison-Sheamus fued has been slow and sloppy. In my opinion, Morrison doesn't fit. He has no connection to Santino and it just doesn't flow for me.

With that being said, I have been beyond entertained at the Satino/Sheamus segments. I'm a huge fan of Sheamus, and although Santino is nothing more than a gloified jobber- the crowd loves him therefore he has the power to put people over. Sheamus will destroy Satino (and Morrison as well) when this is all said and done, but the path they are taking to get there is fantastic.

Take the tea party skit, for example. Yes, it was corny. But it was also so corny that I laughed out loud through the whole segment. It was comedic genius. Anyone notice Sheamus struggling to stay in character? Even he was having a difficult time holding back laughter. Satino just has a talent for making the ridiculous seem important.
 
Uhhh okay, although I agree that morrison can be quite a bit of a spot monkey, don't ever say that just because someone has a top rope finisher, they're automatically one. Just, go back, delete your message or correct yourself.

LMFAO, you idiot! You actually quoted my 2 examples, and then claimed that i said the opposite of what i actually said. Just, go back, delete your message. Don't correct it, just delete it.

Oh, and it was a Triple Threat Submissions Count Anywhere Match. That pretty much means crazy stuff has to be done to entertain the audience members who are looking for something crazy.

So then why do we have HIAC matches where fuck all happens then?

It's not mandatory to jump off the stage for a reaction. Getting hit with the equipment trolley was crazy. Getting thrown down the ramp, and Riley getting thrown into the camera man was crazy. The submission moves using the stair rails was crazy.

Tell me, did HBK or HHH jump off the set in their Tag Team Submission match with Legacy that went all over the arena? No, i don't believe they did.

rattlesnakeforever said:
Um....I started this thread.

I know that, i meant i'm another one of the people who would prefer Kozlov than Morrison.

The rest of what you said, i had no problem with. I ranted about the fact that they gave Kozlov a perfect push and then just stopped for seemingly no reason, and Sheamus had success handed to him.

And how does Khali have a 'great look'?
 
Alright, so the Uso's must be spot monkeys too huh? i mean, their finisher is a "top rope" move. yeah, doesn't make sense does it? But that's how you've categorized it, so next time you feel like calling someone an "idiot", why don't you have a good long look at a mirror (provided it doesn't shatter) and call yourself a waste of brain cells (if you have any, which you probably don't). Oh, and I believe shawn michaels was one of the first guys to "jump off" anything in the wwe during...oh, a ladder match with razor ramone? what about when he jumped off the top of a truck (or whatever) sure, it wasn't a match...but he still did it. Oh wait, does that mean Shawn Michaels is a spot monkey? I mean, IT WASN'T EVEN A MATCH, and he still did it. By your categorization, Shawn Michaels = spot monkey.

Tell, me. do you actually think either HHH or HBK would bother jumping off anything in a third rate wwe ppv? those guys are old, they have their health to think about. sure shawn has done some "jumping off" in recent history, but i think most of those were in wrestlemania's aka the grand daddy of em all.

oh, and i may not like khali, but yeah, he does have 'the look' why? well, he's taller than the big show, and he isn't fat or skinny, the guy is super tank. that's why he has 'the look'.

Fact is, you basically said that if a wrestler has a top-rope finisher then that person is a spot monkey or that if they jumped of a high place then they must also be a spot monkey. yeah, that's pretty much what you were trying to say in what i had quoted you in.

oh, and to any1 with wrestling knowledge aka practically any1 BUT 'The Mark of Zur-En-Arrh' ; did vader's moonsault count as one of his finishers?
 
I'm am also one for it being Koslov vs Sheamus, taking nothing away from Morrison, but Koslov has been lost in the shuffle here being Santino's buddy and Muscle in their matches is entertaining and does help his character, but Vladimir came out as a Monster.. They went so far two years ago as to pit him vs the Undertaker in which he won CLEAN off a Powerslam counter to Oldschool. That is quite a Nod from the company and Taker himself to give him the win. But now he is relegated to being a sidekick.
Koslov vs Sheamus would be a great monster vs monster match, if you put it in the right way, Sheamus corners Santino and just beats the holy hell out of him, leave him a bloody mess (Like how Austin did to Cole just before Alliance occured, you were expecting Tazz to return the next week too avenge Cole, but then Alliance screwed that idea all up.) So you have pissed off Koslov taking on Sheamus, the outcome would be totally uncertain.
 
I like the way that WWE has built up the Morrison VS Sheamus feud so far. Why? Anticipation. They keep on having Sheamus back away when Morrison tries to fight. The more they do that, the more we want to see the match. They should do that with more feuds, honestly. Morrison has quite a bit to gain from this feud. Sheamus is a 2 time WWE Champion. If Morrison wins, he will have some momentum after beating a former world champion and could use that to try breaking into the main event. It isn't a comedy feud because both guys need something to do right now. Sheamus needed an opponent until Trips returns, while Morrison needed an angle with anybody. It works out well for both guys and I can't wait for the match.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,825
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top