F
.Fallout.
Guest
I like them together they have not been together in a long time and we have seen them battle each other a number of time as it is i don't wanna see another Kane vs Undertaker match
-
Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here
Undertaker Or Kane?
- Thread starter mcguiness69
- Start date
I
INFERNO
Guest
I also like them together, you know its funny to think that its been nearly three years since wm 20. I know that WWE will eventually put them in a feud, but im happy seeing them as a team for now
P
punkd24
Guest
if any body should end the streak thats kane
kane is better
kane is better
g-dog the one
New Member
well i think they should stay as THE BROTHERS OF DESTRUCTION and have a match against each other at wrestlemania 23 then after that they come back as a tag team
TheTruNoLimit
Getting Noticed By Management
I am, and will always be a fan of Kane first. Ironically, I was always a huge Undertaker fan, but when they started to introduce Kane, with the entire backstory they set up, and how impactful his debut was by ripping the door to the cell off its hinges, and his overall look turned me into an instant Kane fan.
I never stopped liking Undertaker, but I immediately became a huge Kane fan, and haven't stopped being a huge Kane fan ever since.
I think at his peak, Kane was actually a little more agile than Taker. He was able to do things that I've never seen Taker do... spring board body splashes, spring board clotheslines, hurricanrana's, drop kicks, etc. In the long run, Kane has bad knees and now isn't what he used to be. He can still work decent matches with the right match type or opponent. Taker has slowed up too, and he's more limited in his aerial attacks and agility now than he was, but he hasn't slowed to the point that Kane has. So, right now, ring wise, Taker's better. However, I think Kane's better with the mic if given the opportunity.
In the long run, it doesn't matter. What has EITHER of them done in a long time that's been noteworthy? Vince has been using Kane and Taker to job for years to new guys breaking in to the industry... and the killer part is, they do the jobs to put guys over, and the guys they put over never even amount to anything, yet... every year, we still see WWE pulling new guys out of their asses to throw in there with Kane and Taker and after their fued with Kane and Taker is over, they amount to nothing.
Kane's fueds that amounted to nothing...
Remember Snitsky? What happened when he fueded with Kane? He was at the top of the card, now where is he? Kane spent months locked up in a fued with him and WWE wasted months of building Snitsky up as a legit force, and then after all that, WWE decided to just drop the ball with Snitsky, therefore... it wastes Kane's time.
Fake Kane? Another new guy and I shouldn't start here... a new guy randomly brought up as a fake Kane. Kane does the job to the new guy, and then because of crowd reactions for the one PPV night, WWE dropped the entire angle.
MVP? Sure, MVP's being pushed now... but so was Snitsky... only time will tell.
Undertaker...
Dudley's? Heidenreich? Great Khali?
Both of them have been crapped on by WWE.
I never stopped liking Undertaker, but I immediately became a huge Kane fan, and haven't stopped being a huge Kane fan ever since.
I think at his peak, Kane was actually a little more agile than Taker. He was able to do things that I've never seen Taker do... spring board body splashes, spring board clotheslines, hurricanrana's, drop kicks, etc. In the long run, Kane has bad knees and now isn't what he used to be. He can still work decent matches with the right match type or opponent. Taker has slowed up too, and he's more limited in his aerial attacks and agility now than he was, but he hasn't slowed to the point that Kane has. So, right now, ring wise, Taker's better. However, I think Kane's better with the mic if given the opportunity.
In the long run, it doesn't matter. What has EITHER of them done in a long time that's been noteworthy? Vince has been using Kane and Taker to job for years to new guys breaking in to the industry... and the killer part is, they do the jobs to put guys over, and the guys they put over never even amount to anything, yet... every year, we still see WWE pulling new guys out of their asses to throw in there with Kane and Taker and after their fued with Kane and Taker is over, they amount to nothing.
Kane's fueds that amounted to nothing...
Remember Snitsky? What happened when he fueded with Kane? He was at the top of the card, now where is he? Kane spent months locked up in a fued with him and WWE wasted months of building Snitsky up as a legit force, and then after all that, WWE decided to just drop the ball with Snitsky, therefore... it wastes Kane's time.
Fake Kane? Another new guy and I shouldn't start here... a new guy randomly brought up as a fake Kane. Kane does the job to the new guy, and then because of crowd reactions for the one PPV night, WWE dropped the entire angle.
MVP? Sure, MVP's being pushed now... but so was Snitsky... only time will tell.
Undertaker...
Dudley's? Heidenreich? Great Khali?
Both of them have been crapped on by WWE.
TheTruNoLimit
Getting Noticed By Management
On an unrelated note, has anyone seen the See No Evil DVD? I didn't know if I was gonna buy it or not, but I read that one of the featurettes on it was called Journey into Darkness and was a look at Kane's career and his biggest moments. That in itself could be enough for me to buy the thing, but curious as to how it turned out... I know a lot of times those featurettes are like 5 minutes only.
