The following is an excerpt from an article on TheSun.co.uk:
"WRESTLING icon The Ultimate Warrior is being tipped to enter the WWE Hall of Fame, despite a series of very public fallings out with the company.
It was always thought that Warrior was on a list of people also including Macho Man Randy Savage and Bruno Sammartino who would either never be asked or never accept a HOF invitation.
However this year marks the 20th anniversary of his famous WWE championship victory over Hulk Hogan and relations between him and Vince McMahon are said to have thawed.
They recently came to terms after Warrior filed a legal complaint about the company's negative Self-Destruction of the Ultimate Warrior DVD.
The 2010 WWE Hall of Fame ceremony will take place on March 27 in Phoenix, Arizona, the day before WrestleMania."
If anyone has this up already feel free to delete. I looked but didn't see it anywhere.
Now, the "hatred" between Warrior and the WWE is known. Warrior has been very vocal over the years about anything Vince, as I'm sure as well that the Warrior DVD didn't help any. This, if true, is just another example of how you can never say never in wrestling. And as far as Vince goes, as long as it will make money I truly believe he would make up with anyone.
Here is my question. After thinking it over, I know the Warrior as a huge draw for a time, beating Hogan cleanly at WM will do that I suppose. He is a very well known talent if for anything less then just the way he looked. What I'm fighting with is this, does Warrior really deserve top billing for the HOF? What did Warrior really accomplish other than a couple years on top? Did he really elevate anyone? Did he bring anything new to the business other than ridiculous promos? I know there are alot of Warrior fans so I'm interested in what people think on this. I don't dislike Warrior, I don't love his work either. I just think he is middle of the ground when it comes to history.
When I think of Warrior going into the HOF I think that there should really be someone else going in with top billing. If this is really going to happen, I don't know what type of spot Warrior would get, but I'm assuming he would be Vince's big name for the year. I just compare him to the past inductees that have been the top name and he just doesn't fit with the likes of Bret Hart, Austin, Rhodes, Flair, and Hogan. I know these are huge names. I know that they are pretty much the cream of the crop. Obviously, you will one day run out of people that lived at the top for so many years. I just personally feel that Warrior didn't invest enough into the business to go in as the main inductee. He wrestled Savage and Hogan at WM with two pretty respectable matches. He was definately different, but so was The Boogeyman.
Does Warrior deserve top billing at the HOF or is he not at the level that one should have for this honor? If he does deserve it, what is it that puts him at that level in your eyes?
"WRESTLING icon The Ultimate Warrior is being tipped to enter the WWE Hall of Fame, despite a series of very public fallings out with the company.
It was always thought that Warrior was on a list of people also including Macho Man Randy Savage and Bruno Sammartino who would either never be asked or never accept a HOF invitation.
However this year marks the 20th anniversary of his famous WWE championship victory over Hulk Hogan and relations between him and Vince McMahon are said to have thawed.
They recently came to terms after Warrior filed a legal complaint about the company's negative Self-Destruction of the Ultimate Warrior DVD.
The 2010 WWE Hall of Fame ceremony will take place on March 27 in Phoenix, Arizona, the day before WrestleMania."
If anyone has this up already feel free to delete. I looked but didn't see it anywhere.
Now, the "hatred" between Warrior and the WWE is known. Warrior has been very vocal over the years about anything Vince, as I'm sure as well that the Warrior DVD didn't help any. This, if true, is just another example of how you can never say never in wrestling. And as far as Vince goes, as long as it will make money I truly believe he would make up with anyone.
Here is my question. After thinking it over, I know the Warrior as a huge draw for a time, beating Hogan cleanly at WM will do that I suppose. He is a very well known talent if for anything less then just the way he looked. What I'm fighting with is this, does Warrior really deserve top billing for the HOF? What did Warrior really accomplish other than a couple years on top? Did he really elevate anyone? Did he bring anything new to the business other than ridiculous promos? I know there are alot of Warrior fans so I'm interested in what people think on this. I don't dislike Warrior, I don't love his work either. I just think he is middle of the ground when it comes to history.
When I think of Warrior going into the HOF I think that there should really be someone else going in with top billing. If this is really going to happen, I don't know what type of spot Warrior would get, but I'm assuming he would be Vince's big name for the year. I just compare him to the past inductees that have been the top name and he just doesn't fit with the likes of Bret Hart, Austin, Rhodes, Flair, and Hogan. I know these are huge names. I know that they are pretty much the cream of the crop. Obviously, you will one day run out of people that lived at the top for so many years. I just personally feel that Warrior didn't invest enough into the business to go in as the main inductee. He wrestled Savage and Hogan at WM with two pretty respectable matches. He was definately different, but so was The Boogeyman.
Does Warrior deserve top billing at the HOF or is he not at the level that one should have for this honor? If he does deserve it, what is it that puts him at that level in your eyes?