MetalHead2010
New Member
[QUOTE="The Kill Joy" Robert Morales;1755712]
1) Not all the wrestling federations have to be the same as WWE.
2) Just because something changes overnight everything else has to fall in place immediate.
3) Professional Wrestling isn't all about character and story development.
My rant is over.[/QUOTE]
The problem with these questions, statements or whatever you want to call them.
1. They are trying to be like WWE in every way, and failing at it. Why in the hell do you think they keep bringing in WWE reject after WWE reject and the one guy they had who wasn't a WWE reject, Christian left and went back to WWE because it sucked.
2. And it is not a matter of changing over night, they have had 5+ years to change, and still do the same lame ass story lines they did in WCW. Deny it and you must be clueless to wrestling or its history.
3. WWE is exactly about character and story line. Without them, nobody will be entertained. I may be new here, but I have shadowed the forum for a long time and just now decided to post because I thought this post was incredibly misinformed and clueless when it came down to wrestling and its history.
Of course these are my opinions and if whoever doesn't like it tough. Because I doubt I will ever post again. To me, TNA is lame and what is sad is, they have more talent than WWE but cannot beat them.
1) Not all the wrestling federations have to be the same as WWE.
2) Just because something changes overnight everything else has to fall in place immediate.
3) Professional Wrestling isn't all about character and story development.
My rant is over.[/QUOTE]
The problem with these questions, statements or whatever you want to call them.
1. They are trying to be like WWE in every way, and failing at it. Why in the hell do you think they keep bringing in WWE reject after WWE reject and the one guy they had who wasn't a WWE reject, Christian left and went back to WWE because it sucked.
2. And it is not a matter of changing over night, they have had 5+ years to change, and still do the same lame ass story lines they did in WCW. Deny it and you must be clueless to wrestling or its history.
3. WWE is exactly about character and story line. Without them, nobody will be entertained. I may be new here, but I have shadowed the forum for a long time and just now decided to post because I thought this post was incredibly misinformed and clueless when it came down to wrestling and its history.
Of course these are my opinions and if whoever doesn't like it tough. Because I doubt I will ever post again. To me, TNA is lame and what is sad is, they have more talent than WWE but cannot beat them.