Hello, guys, here's the 10th installment of the WWE Series! Feel free to request, and this one's for you, Christian101. I'm trying to organize this and make these more entertaining, give me feedback please
What kind of investment has Alberto Del Rio been to the WWE: Positive, Neutral, or Negative?
Just the Facts:
1) ADR is 35 years old.
2) He's only been in the WWE since 2010 (not counting FCW).
3) He is the first wrestler in history to win a Royal Rumble and a Money in the Bank match in the same year.
Analysis: ADR was supposed to be the next JBL, or something. He was supposed to be a top heel. He's been pushed to the moon and even to Mars! He's a two-time WWE Champion. But does he get over? No. And the WWE doesn't even see it. Ricardo Rodriguez gets more heat than ADR. ADR's now the number 1 contender for the World Heavyweight Title, and I don't understand it.
Decision: I think that Alberto Del Rio, while a very versatile wrestler, has been a neutral investment for the WWE. That being said, I don't think he's a bad superstar, just not a main-eventer.
What's your opinion?
And...
What kind of investment has Alberto Del Rio been to the WWE: Positive, Neutral, or Negative?
Just the Facts:
1) ADR is 35 years old.
2) He's only been in the WWE since 2010 (not counting FCW).
3) He is the first wrestler in history to win a Royal Rumble and a Money in the Bank match in the same year.
Analysis: ADR was supposed to be the next JBL, or something. He was supposed to be a top heel. He's been pushed to the moon and even to Mars! He's a two-time WWE Champion. But does he get over? No. And the WWE doesn't even see it. Ricardo Rodriguez gets more heat than ADR. ADR's now the number 1 contender for the World Heavyweight Title, and I don't understand it.
Decision: I think that Alberto Del Rio, while a very versatile wrestler, has been a neutral investment for the WWE. That being said, I don't think he's a bad superstar, just not a main-eventer.
What's your opinion?
And...