Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Holy shit...of their 90 wins, they won 88 of them by double-digits. That's fucking phenomenal.
Sure I do, they won more games, how can you not rank it above UCLA?
I don't know if the quality of opponent was up to par, but I don't really complain about it. They had a great streak, big ups to them.
Durr becaz itz not mens basketball. This streak is just not going to be broken for a while.
Surprising, but inconsequential. They would have beaten Tennessee too.2. How is it possible that UConn hasn't played Tennessee in this streak? That's rather surprising.
It's not like it's UConn's men beating a bunch of women's teams, it's UConn's women. How are they "pretty different"?Men's and Women's basketball are pretty different.
And the quality of opponents UCLA played was up to par? Based on what, because they were guys?
UCLA probably had more of an advantage than UConn does now. Besides the fact UConn won more games, they also deal with much stricter recruiting rules, greater communication and technology, more competitive recruiting, and far more variety in basketball styles.
The ONLY reason people want to say UConn's streak wasn't as impressive is because they are girls. And that's just ridiculous.
It is impressive, no doubt. At the same time though, can you even really compare the two? I mean, they're vastly different streaks.
It's not like it's UConn's men beating a bunch of women's teams, it's UConn's women. How are they "pretty different"?
You're making yourself look sexist.
Sure I do, they won more games, how can you not rank it above UCLA?
I think men are more athletic, it's a big difference. They're more physical, too. Do you think a woman could play against men and do the same she had been doing to the women?
How are they vastly different?
The [OFFICIAL] ScreaminNormanSmiley;2713890 said:Because the UCLA had that streak in the middle of a nine year straight championship run. In the end the tournament is all that matters and UCLA had an overall longer period of domination.
How are they vastly different?
Slyfox696 said:Do you think if UCLA had played the Lakers or the Celtics during their win streak they would have won 88 in a row?
That doesn't make sense. Like I said, it wasn't UConn's men that were playing women, it was women playing women. It's an even playing field, UConn was just much better.
That has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Streak though. But since we're on the topic, UConn has won 6 national titles since 2000, and they look poised to win many more.
Because he knows how sexist it'll make him look.It's because it's men vs women. He just doesn't want to say it.
The other thing people don't think about is the game is SOO different today than it used to be. Crock keeps talking about athleticism, but the game wasn't dictated by athleticism when UCLA was on their streak. You couldn't carry the ball like they do today, you couldn't make body contact with the dribbler, you couldn't go over the back...officiating was much tighter. Furthermore, you didn't have the Internet to recruit (which means big name school automatically attracted top talent), the NCAA Tournament was by invite only and/or was a much smaller field (meaning if you wanted a championship, you had to go to a big college) and college sports didn't have the national television exposure they do now. Additionally, the varieties in the style of basketball being player are SOOO much different now than they were when UConn was making their run. Finally, when UCLA was making their run, there was no such thing as a three point shot, and the three point shot has proven to be a great equalizer in college basketball.But UConn's streak is much more impressive. They've won all but two games during the streak by more than 10 points, they've beaten TOP 5 teams by 20-30 points. We're talking Baylor at 2, Ohio State was in the top 10, and so was Duke, North Carolina, Texas and other big name women's programs. They've handled them like nothing.
UCLA had many, MANY close games during their streak, but their discipline helped them win those games. Consistency is the key to a streak and those teams were consistent in their play. Every highlight you see from UConn is the same highlight, just playing a different team. Think about that.
And UCLA's players were more athletic than UConn's...I'm sorry, but that's a stupid fucking argument. They are level playing fields. Yes, UConn's opponents aren't as athletic (although I would argue they get to play more athletically now than when UCLA made their run), but neither is UConn able to recruit the same athletes UCLA did.The times are really different, UCLA's streak was was 40 years ago. The sports are different. I mean, Men's and Women's basketball are different. Like I said, men are more athletic, the game is more physical, different court measurements, different timing, different ball sizes, etc.
Exactly. You can't compare apples to oranges, and then say one is better than another.You got me there.
No, they are EVEN playing fields. Men play men and women play women. It's not like UConn is starting players like Kevin Durant. Their players are women too.They're two different playing fields, that's why there is a record for MEN and one for WOMEN.