How so? In the 28 games Dragic started last season he averaged 18 ppg and 8.4 ast and had a lower turnover rate than Nash. Is it really so far fetched to think a rising 26 year old point guard can be better than a 38 year old Steve Nash? And as far as Grant Hill being equal to Beasley I'm not so sure about that. I'll take a 23 year old Beasley who's never lived up to his potential and is motivated to be an all star this season over a Grant Hill who will be 40 by the start of the season, had knee surgery near the end of last season, and benefited a lot from Phoenix's medical staff.
It is very farfetched that an 18 game sample from Dragic is making you believe he will be better then Nash next season. Beasley may be younger and have more overall talent at this point then Hill but he is also a head case who is very inconsistent. The levelheadedness and experience of Hill evens out the athleticism and ability he has lost over the years. Hill was still a double digit scorer last year and is a better defender then Beasley as well.