The Pointless Thread | Page 260 | WrestleZone Forums

The Pointless Thread

^^^Word.

You know what I hate, not enough traveling in the NBA. I swear, I was watching highlights of the Celtics-Hawks game, he must've had taken at least 4 steps before dunking it. Refs need to call that more. It annoys me more then anything.
 
Yeah, that is pretty annoying, there are times were its blatant, pepole are supposably making these great plays, but they travel while doing so, it really pisses me off.
 
48 hour rule, gives people time to discuss each match and do some research before voting on it

even though half of them are currently open
 
Regarding McFadden he will be gone by the Raiders at 4 or the Jets at 6.

The Lions, it will probably be a defensive players, probably the best defensive back available, thats were they need the most help.

Raiders are stupid if they take him, they need much more
 
:smashfreakB: ill tell you that the raiders do need almost everything but meh...? im not a raiders fan so i honestly dony care i like the ravens...yes yes i know one of the suckiest teams in the nfl but that doesnt mean im still not going to be a fan =) OH! how bout those Tigers? did you guys see them sweep the rangers holy crap. and that game where it was 19-6??? are you kidding meh the tigers rapped the rangers in that game! i think they will comeback and win the AL Central!
 
The Raiders need everything, its never stupid to take the best player on the board, McFadden is the best player on the board. Who else will they take? Gholston-he wont have much of an impact next year and is a risk, Ellis-probably a reach, they would love Dorsey, but not going to happen, they dont like Long for some reason, so McFadden makes the most sense if they dont want long......
 
They already have 4 running backs, they don't need another. There are plenty of other needs they need, but it all depends on who the Rams take.
 
I know they have 4 running backs, but none of them are great or the caliber of McFadden. Yes they have a bunch of needs, but who should they take. Its going to go, Long, Dorsey, Ryan, the top three more than likely. That would leave the Raiders to choose from Chris Long, McFadden, Gholdston, and Ellis......for some reason the word is they dont want Long, I dont know why, they might think about Ellis and Gholdston, but McFadden is the best player on the board and they need help for Russell, real help, McFadden is a playmaker, something they need.

Note: Did the Vikings really need to take AP last year, No, they have Taylor and I think that worked out pretty good for them.
 
Why in the world take a position they don't need
They need a DT, and Ellis isn't a reach, he's a solid DT. They don't want Long because something with his dad i heard, not too sure.
Lane Kiffin doesn't even want to take McFadden, but al davis is going to go in and abuse his power and make another idiot decision and take McFadden.
 
I have a feeling that Kiffin, a offensive coach, wouldn't mind gettin McFadden. Ellis is a reach, he is good, but he's not considered part of the big 6 players. When you are using a first round pick, you aren't drafting soley based on the next year. Sure they have 4 backs already, are any of them any good, not really. McFadden will be the best player on the board, if Dorsey gets taken my the Rams, they dont want Long, who if you were taking a defensive lineman, that would make the most since, they just paid Kelly alot of money for the DT spot. Davis will probably take McFadden, but its not a dumb move, was taking AP a dumb move last year a dumb move by the Vikings, sure they could have used other stuff more because they already had Taylor, but they took AP because he was the best player on the board, as the Raiders will.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top