The Pointless Thread

[Lil Wes]

Damn you I said that! And he started 10 and played in 11. 14/25 for 227 yards 2 td and 3 int in a 36 -22 loss against new york.

220/337, 2903 yds, 19 TD's, and a 95.1 QB rating in 11 games.

Pro Bowl worthy.

 

[Cage917r]

Well I'm not going to make a case against somebody giving Palmer some credit! They are all very equal talent wise, not much of a difference.

 

[Moon Knight]

PALMER DOESNT WIN GAMES ALONE!!!! LOL!!! HE doesnt loose, the TEAM loses!!..The Bengals were TERRIBLE last year?? You ever see them on TV??

Add to that the fact that they have probably THE lowest team chemistry, and team character in the league. You know what happens to a team full of people with low character who dont give a fuck about each other when the chips get down?? They all fucking quit and play that much worse, so not only were they terrible to begin with, but add the character factor, and that most of them werent playing as well as they could anyway.

If anything, how good he has preformed for THAT gagglefuck peice of shit team, only PROVES how good he is.

LOL. 27th Defense in the league. Can't win much with that. They did have the 7th best pass offense.

 

[Moon Knight]

220/337, 2903 yds, 19 TD's, and a 95.1 QB rating in 11 games.

Pro Bowl worthy.

You forgot the 13 int's.

 

[Lil Wes]

Team sport, Palmer can't win alone. Now talk about his individual performance which he has put together 3 good years in a row.

Agreed, you want to talk talents, he's up there or better than Romo. Fine. I didn't realize he had played so well until I looked his stats over.

My bad. But what baffles me here and makes me want to LOL!!!! is, you just used my same logic I had been using on Romo for months, and last night you along with Xflame used the opposite.

Oh, the hypocrisy.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

LOL. 27th Defense in the league. Can't win much with that. They did have the 7th best pass offense.

With no running game, no tight ends, and a shit offensive line. AND their special teams were laborious. And add in the character and chemistry stuff. Not winning a lot.

 

[Lil Wes]

You forgot the 13 int's.

I knew you would catch that

 

[Cage917r]

My new top 5 QB's: 1. Brady 2. Manning 3. Romo 3. Palmer 3. Big Ben, there that should make everyone happey....................Oh wait making everybody agree and happy, now thats mission impossible.

 

[Lil Wes]

With no running game, no tight ends, and a shit offensive line. AND their special teams were laborious. And add in the character and chemistry stuff. Not winning a lot.

Agreed, I was wrong.

 

[Moon Knight]

Agreed, you want to talk talents, he's up there or better than Romo. Fine. I didn't realize he had played so well until I looked his stats over.

My bad. But what baffles me here and makes me want to LOL!!!! is, you just used my same logic I had been using on Romo for months, and last night you along with Xflame used the opposite.

Oh, the hypocrisy.

Care to prove that?

And when I used your logic to brush off Romo's first year that you used to brush of calderon you claimed different logic.

Oh, the hypocrisy.

 

[Moon Knight]

I knew you would catch that

Of course. I also catch the fact 2 of Brady's best years stats wise he didn't win a SB.......Something might be in that.

 

[Lil Wes]

And when I used your logic to brush off Romo's first year that you used to brush of calderon you claimed different logic.

Oh, the hypocrisy.

Basketball is a different sport. Loads different in determining better players than football.

Calderon is good, but not better than Parker. I don't care what you say.

 

[Lil Wes]

Care to prove that?

No, too lazy to look back in the thread.

 

[Lil Wes]

Of course. I also catch the fact 2 of Brady's best years stats wise he didn't win a SB.......Something might be in that.

Doesn't matter.

Those 2 seasons just further why he's the best QB in the NFL, and is on his way to being one of the all time greats.

 

[Moon Knight]

Basketball is a different sport. Loads different in determining better players than football.

Calderon is good, but not better than Parker. I don't care what you say.

Same logic in terms of criticizing a player based on the talent of conference he is in. And I said Calderon is having a better year than Parker due to the fact Parker is having an off year, all year previous Parker was better.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

Parker > calderon. by miles.

 

[Cage917r]

They are both very good, if the Nuggets had a PG like that, they wouldn't be fighting to get in the playoffs. Of course if they played in the Eastern Conference they wouldn't be fighting to get in the playoffs either, LOL.

Regarding them two though, its obvious at this point that Parker is better than Calderon.

 

[Moon Knight]

No, too lazy to look back in the thread.

 

[Lil Wes]

What?

 

[Moon Knight]

What?

I dropped your punk card and you refused to pick it up.

 

[Lil Wes]

Like I told Xfear, I don't give 2 shits about what you think. If I don't want to do something like argue over a biased network or scroll through 12 pages of 30 posts to look for a pointless post, I'm not going to do it.

 

[Moon Knight]

Like I told Xfear, I don't give 2 shits about what you think. If I don't want to do something like argue over a biased network or scroll through 12 pages of 30 posts to look for a pointless post, I'm not going to do it.

Because it isn't there. You called me a hypocrite and when I called you on it and demanded proof you refused to provide any. You just proved you have no proof of me being a hypocrite, so just stop calling me one. Now move on before this erupts into another pointless bitchfight.

 

[Lil Wes]

You are comparing apples to oranges cage! That whole Dilfer thing has been put to sleep let it rest. First it was the Ravens he was the QB of and not the BENGALS! You can't compare what Eli did to what Dilfer didn't do. The fact is they are two different situations and teams, Dilfer didn't lead his team to anything that was his defense not him, all he had to do was NOT lose. Eli had to lead his team to victory, he had to take the Giants on his back and march them down the field in the last ticks of the game, he needed to help them win and Dilfer just had to not lose. There is no comparison here and you need to know the difference! That argument has been shot dead, stop trying to revive it.

Ben isn't better than Palmer and the Steelers didn't win because of him? BULL! Ben threw more TD's and less INT's than Palmer and completed a higher % of his passes than Palmer, his passes on average completed for more yards than Palmer and he had one of the highest QB ratings in the league. Get your facts straight, Ben outplayed Palmer and the Steelers won because he had a great year across the board. Not forgetting he his more mobile and can extend plays better. Ben > Palmer.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Moon Knight]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thats your smoking gun? Please, there is nothing hypocritical about that. I used stats there to back Ben as being good and used stats to do the same with Palmer and used similar logic to defend Palmers play. You got nothing Wes, just drop it and move on as that is not hypocritical.

 

[Lil Wes]

Lawlz DIAR lawlz.

I'll drop it, but your wrong. Moving on now.