From 1993-2002 the WWF held what are considered to be the classic five pay per views. Of course I am referring to Royal Rumble, WrestleMania, King of the Ring, SummerSlam, and Survivor Series. Which year do you think was the best collectively for the classic five? Basically I’m looking for an average of sorts. For example I thought the best SummerSlam took place in 2002 but King of the Ring and Survivor Series were a little weak that year. Royal Rumble and WrestleMania were good but not quite good enough to make up for KOTR and Survivor Series so 2002 won’t be my answer. There isn’t any specific formula; just your own opinion.
Believe it or not my answer is 1996. I know that’s typically considered a bad year for the WWF, but I felt that each of the classic five pay per views delivered a good show. More importantly when “calculating” my own averages none of the shows were bad so nothing dragged down the average.
Royal Rumble: It’s generally looked at as a bad rumble and I can understand why. Doug Gilbert, Omori, the Squat Team, and a 55 year old Dory Funk Jr. didn’t exactly add to the star power of the rumble match. I can look past that though. I remember the controversial and intriguing angle between Goldust and Razor Ramon. I remember Shawn Michaels cementing himself as the new main event man in the WWF. I remember the debut of Vader which was something I wanted to see for years. To me one of the main goals of the Royal Rumble is to get me excited for WrestleMania. After the rumble Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels, Undertaker vs. Diesel, and Vader vs. Yokozuna (although it would later change) were set and I was physced for mania.
WrestleMania: It seems that people here either loved the Iron Man Match or hated it. I’m in the loved it category. Bret and Shawn were easily my two favorites to watch so putting the in the main event at mania for sixty minutes was a dream match for me. The rest of the show was solid with the only down part being a lack of matches. Six matches just aren’t enough for mania but it was still a good show.
King of the Ring: I really enjoyed this show. Of course it’s remembered for the famous Austin 3:16 speech. That makes it one of the most significant shows in WWE history but there were other parts I enjoyed too. Undertaker vs. Mankind was a great feud and this is where they hooked up on ppv for the first time. I enjoyed the feud between Ahmed Johnson and Goldust too. The main event was strong as HBK and Davey Boy usually worked well together. It’s forgotten because of Austin’s speech just a few minutes later but Brian Pillman delivered a very attitude like promo that night too. This event just had a fresh feel to it and it planted the seeds to what would become a new era in wrestling.
SummerSlam: An overall solid show. It’s probably best remembered for the first boiler room brawl. I’m not usually a fan of matches that take place away from the ring but this worked for me. I really liked the main event. It felt like a big match and the crowd was into it the whole way. There have been better SummerSlams but I don’t have anything bad to say about this one.
Survivor Series: Bret Hart vs. Steve Austin alone makes this a good show. It was a great match that is often overlooked because of their WrestleMania classic. The main event was pretty good too as Shawn Michaels gave Sid what was probably the best match of his career. They didn’t amount to much but I enjoyed the debut of Doug Furnas and Phil Lafon. Another guy who made his debut accomplished a bit more; Rocky Maivia.
Individually I’m not sure if any of these events were the best of its kind, but collectively I believe 1996 produced the best of the classic five pay per views. That was not an easy decision and I could accept a number of different answers so let me know your opinions.
Believe it or not my answer is 1996. I know that’s typically considered a bad year for the WWF, but I felt that each of the classic five pay per views delivered a good show. More importantly when “calculating” my own averages none of the shows were bad so nothing dragged down the average.
Royal Rumble: It’s generally looked at as a bad rumble and I can understand why. Doug Gilbert, Omori, the Squat Team, and a 55 year old Dory Funk Jr. didn’t exactly add to the star power of the rumble match. I can look past that though. I remember the controversial and intriguing angle between Goldust and Razor Ramon. I remember Shawn Michaels cementing himself as the new main event man in the WWF. I remember the debut of Vader which was something I wanted to see for years. To me one of the main goals of the Royal Rumble is to get me excited for WrestleMania. After the rumble Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels, Undertaker vs. Diesel, and Vader vs. Yokozuna (although it would later change) were set and I was physced for mania.
WrestleMania: It seems that people here either loved the Iron Man Match or hated it. I’m in the loved it category. Bret and Shawn were easily my two favorites to watch so putting the in the main event at mania for sixty minutes was a dream match for me. The rest of the show was solid with the only down part being a lack of matches. Six matches just aren’t enough for mania but it was still a good show.
King of the Ring: I really enjoyed this show. Of course it’s remembered for the famous Austin 3:16 speech. That makes it one of the most significant shows in WWE history but there were other parts I enjoyed too. Undertaker vs. Mankind was a great feud and this is where they hooked up on ppv for the first time. I enjoyed the feud between Ahmed Johnson and Goldust too. The main event was strong as HBK and Davey Boy usually worked well together. It’s forgotten because of Austin’s speech just a few minutes later but Brian Pillman delivered a very attitude like promo that night too. This event just had a fresh feel to it and it planted the seeds to what would become a new era in wrestling.
SummerSlam: An overall solid show. It’s probably best remembered for the first boiler room brawl. I’m not usually a fan of matches that take place away from the ring but this worked for me. I really liked the main event. It felt like a big match and the crowd was into it the whole way. There have been better SummerSlams but I don’t have anything bad to say about this one.
Survivor Series: Bret Hart vs. Steve Austin alone makes this a good show. It was a great match that is often overlooked because of their WrestleMania classic. The main event was pretty good too as Shawn Michaels gave Sid what was probably the best match of his career. They didn’t amount to much but I enjoyed the debut of Doug Furnas and Phil Lafon. Another guy who made his debut accomplished a bit more; Rocky Maivia.
Individually I’m not sure if any of these events were the best of its kind, but collectively I believe 1996 produced the best of the classic five pay per views. That was not an easy decision and I could accept a number of different answers so let me know your opinions.