I missed off an "s", my bad. Still not sure what you're correcting me on though, in fact you're agreeing with me. Sheamus vs. Bryan was indeed months ago.
I'm agreeing with you in a sense. If you didn't mean to say "months" than I took the whole thing the wrong way, if not, then I still stand by my stance that WWE have used Bryan in a decent manor over the past few "months" and he has done more than nothing, or
"WWE hadn't done anything with him in months."
Yeah, err, months ago. It also ceased to be significant when WWE dumped it from the main Mania card.
In fairness it was dumped to dark match due to time constraints. WWE made the mistake booking shit like Snooki, so that they could show some use for Dolph and Morrison. And The Rock didn't help either with his opening promo and several backstage scenes. Not like they could have removed Punk/Orton, Taker/HHH or Rey/Rhodes from the card to make way for Sheamus and Bryan. They had a decent feud going on but it was the obvious lacklustre one on the WM card and neither are celebrities
(If Snooki the troll can be classified as a celebrity.)
Smackdown is full of interesting little matches and angles. But if they're significant or they serve a purpose they will get on PPV. WWE had time to fit forgettable Chavo vs. Cara & Barrett vs. Jackson matches on PPV, yet not this semi-feud. And this is after Rhodes was featured in a well built feud with Rey Mysterio. Going from feuding with Mysterio on PPV to feuding with Bryan on TV is a massive step down, I think you'll agree.
Chavo and Cara was made simply to put Mistico over. Nothing more or less. WWE needed to cash in on their signing and they decided that was the avenue. Barrett and Jackson was probably added to build something around their feud and the eventual Jackson IC reign, so again, not quality matches but they had purposes, while Rhodes/Bryan was simply just a back-and-forth win/loss feud. So it was a perfect fit for Smackdown.
I agree. Rhodes going from defeating Rey at WM to Bryan on Smackdown was a step down, but personally I felt Rhodes was being too heavily pushed, currently I think he's better suited to holding the IC Championship that say "main eventing." But at the same time, Danielson and Rhodes, although entertaining and featuring great matches didn't really need a PPV bout. If anything, they had a back-and-forth exchance during MITB and they were both made to seem focused on the other at the beginning of the match.
Just putting him on TV doesn't mean they've been doing something with him. Kofi Kingston is on TV every week, he holds titles periodically, he's involved in feuds, yet WWE aren't doing anything with him. Same thing here. They've only started to do anything with Bryan in the three weeks since Money In The Bank.
Have to agree. Kingston sucks though - find him overly bland and has no qualities which stand out. At the same time, I still stand by the fact, WWE have been steadily building Danielson, even pre-MITB I claimed regularly he was the second biggest face on SD!
If they were doing something with him would his MITB victory have been so much of a surprise?
It was a factor to add, but I thought more people would be surprised because it was DBD. Simply because it was him. He isn't one of the sterotypical guy WWE would have even step from the undercard. But they obviously let him have it because, if anything, the fans wanted it and it was good for business.