Poor refereeing is normally what makes exciting football games.
No.
It.
[YOUTUBE]zTfPOzUc1JI[/YOUTUBE]
Isn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Poor refereeing is normally what makes exciting football games.
Going to taekwondo this avo. Know absolutely nothing about it.
Wow, Kobe was on fire in the fourth quarter. Almost single-handedly turned it from a competitive game to a blowout. And LeBron James with a triple-double in only 30 minutes.
Which was quite shocking on both counts. I fully expected a team full of relative unknowns to provide a serious challenge to a team featuring Kobe, LeBron, and a team full of NBA calibre players.
Really? I think most intelligent people would have expected Team USA to soundly defeat Australia, like they did. After all, the very best players in Australia have not traditionally fared well against the very best players from America. But that is what's so great about the Olympics. No matter which country they come from, you know you're seeing that country's very best in that sport.
Men's is competitive, but not the the extent it should be. Countries like Spain and Argentina typically field good teams and Brazil and Lithuania and the former Yugoslavia have fielded competitive teams in the past. Even before they changed the rules in '92 to allow NBA players the US still dominated, winning all but two golds in that time. The issue is that the sport is just now becoming popular on a global scale. Every year the US team gets a little bit less dominant. They got rid of baseball and softball because they were too uncompetitive, but the margins there weren't nearly as great. Also the UK is poor at it and you are jellyI agree Sly, but surely a sport like basketball shouldn't be in the Olympics anyway. Not because it has no merit as a sport, but because it's not really competitive. No other country in the world has a basketball league on the scale of the NBA, also it's not bound by the same rules as football where you are limited to only three professionals in the squad or if there is the USA has managed to circumvent it pretty easily.
I enjoy watching basketball but it's the only sport out of the 26 sports at this olympics that isn't competitive at all and it just doesn't make sense to me.
I agree Sly, but surely a sport like basketball shouldn't be in the Olympics anyway. Not because it has no merit as a sport, but because it's not really competitive. No other country in the world has a basketball league on the scale of the NBA, also it's not bound by the same rules as football where you are limited to only three professionals in the squad or if there is the USA has managed to circumvent it pretty easily.
I enjoy watching basketball but it's the only sport out of the 26 sports at this olympics that isn't competitive at all and it just doesn't make sense to me.
Misty May-Treanor and Kerry Walsh have won three straight gold medals in women's beach volleyball and have won 21 straight matches in Olympic competition. Michael Phelps has won more gold medals and more total medals than anyone in Olympic history (Phelps has won TWICE as many gold medals as the next person on the list). Are we going to exclude them as well?