This is the type of thing I would have expected from Sidious. Thank you for proving me right once again.
Nobody (including yourself) has proven you right once in this thread.
First of all, you made a couple of typographical errors, so they do exist. However, I usually don't hold that against people, because typos happen. But you did have errors in your typing.
Not in the section where you made reference to them... Besides, it seems you often understand what I mean regardless of my typos, whereas you rarely-if-ever state something that is both comprehensible & true.
And it doesn't make sense. You're trying to say that because you talk to people offline, they automatically have a different reality than people on here do. Which is just absurd, because except for the strange reality you've allowed to nest in your mind, there's really only one reality that most of the world sees.
Most of the world only sees one... But many here seem to see one where I am a troll/idiot & you are intelligent... Which simply has no truth or reality in it.
Oh no, you're definitely little. Little intelligence, little reading comprehension, little common sense, little quality as a poster...little is definitely a word which defines you.
I comprehend when I read; It is you that fails to do so when you write. We go back to that incorrect/other reality, where you deny mistakes when they are pointed-out/referenced.
I also have far more posting quality than you, which is where the irony comes: It matters not as you have power on the forums, including power to change the name & other things on-&-in my posts.
Yes you are. You're bemoaning the fact I'm a much better poster than you, which is why I am where I am, and you are where you are.
When you say "the fact that...", it should be followed by a fact. You are right about our respective locations, but not the reason.
Only funny in the ironic sort of way, having my mistakes pointed-out by a person who makes as many as you.
Never said either of those things. Good attempt at trying to deflect the point
I never said you did. I was asking a question, not making a statement.... Once again, reading comprehension fails you.
The point is what you did is classic trolling...you come into a thread and provide an opinion which contrasts with the popular one, for no reason other than to start an argument.
That may be the one point you have tried to make. I, on the other hand, have successfully made several.
And we know it was to start an argument, because you still haven't provided a single piece of evidence for what you said.
I gave the reason it is pointless for me to name anyone, as we already know you would disagree. Again, makes sense to intelligent persons.
Once again, avoiding answering the question. Trolling 101.
There was no question asked. Besides, I didn't know it was "trolling" to state facts. How would you know, when you've never done so?!
No, you didn't read that. What you read is that it was the only post I PLANNED on making in the thread. My plans changed.
Not a problem; I believe you plan to sound intelligent every time you post. Let me know if you ever do that successfully.
Here, I'll even quote it for you. You can click that little blue arrow to see the post in its entirety.
Once more, reading comprehension fails you.
No, I understood everything I read. I simply realized before that it was pointless to read entire posts of yours in some cases; They are filled with things you incorrectly claim to be facts, & statements that are perhaps even self-contradictory.
Anyways, getting back to the point, show us your 26 page list of NBA players that you've seen who are better than LeBron. You don't want people calling you a troll, here's a great opportunity to work towards shedding the label.
Hypothetically, I could go ahead & post that whole list. You'd quote some (or perhaps all) of it, & say simply, "No. Lebron is the best", stating what you already have. That might then be followed by pages of posters agreeing with you, largely to escape punishments given to themselves for correcting you. Regardless, my name/label would not change
