Should Taker return to feud with Kane...over the title?

[Vincent Michaels]

I just had a great idea, give Kane the title to defend against Taker if the rumors are true that he did it. It'll give us something we've never seen before from their fueding and it's not like Kane doesn't deserve it. We could Kane get some definitive wins over Taker so it can finally end in a Hell in a Cell match!

The best part is that the set up would be perfect. Kane wins the Smackdown MITB, cashes it in on Mysterio, destroy him(so he can get off TV), win the title, and have Taker return to get revenge!

What does everybody think???

 

[Steve Rogers]

Eh.
Ive seen Taker vs Kane so much I care not to even count it, not a bad idea just one I do not want to see. I really do not want to even see it be revealed Kane is the one who put Taker in a "vegetative" state. Give it to someone who could use the exposure.

 

[Sora/roxas]

I dont want kane to be the attacker at all. I agree someone else needs the exposure more than kane. But if Kane won the mitb, and casked it in on The Undertaker, this would be good. It starts a fued over the title, gives Kane the title, and gives a new guy some exposure as being the attacker. Of course make it a short fued b/c its been done so much.

 

[kofifan23]

i dont taker should feud with kane but will. i dont see them giving the title to kane. i think they will have big show win it and feud with rey. i think they will be a boring feudand will continue till sumerslam. i think kane will be reaveld as the attcer after MITB and taker will come back for a big match at summerslam

 

[Lyson Rayne]

Like the posters before me, I'm not interested in Taker vs Kane again. Both are big men passed their prime who have clashed more times than I care to count. Kane may deserve the title, but he doesn't interest me at all anymore, and 5+ years of jobber status has ruined his monster persona. I don't care if this storyline tries making him seem more personally motivated or whatever, you could have Taker rape Kane in the lockerroom and I wouldn't believe he was pissed enough to fight towards a victory. Someone young with a future should win MiTB, not Kane who's career is coming to a close.

 

[Validus]

The Wrestling Observer is reporting that current WWE plans call for this year's SummerSlam event to be centered around the returns of both Triple H and The Undertaker. Although things can always change, the early PPV plan is to have Triple H face Sheamus in a grudge match and for The Undertaker to face whoever put him the vegetative state.

(Ignore the Triple H part)

So , unless Kane put him in the vegetated state , then no .
But Like Lyson Rayne and Guru of Greatness599 , I don't want to see another 'Taker vs Kane feud . Same reasons to why I don't .

 

[Ruthless-RKO]

So by Kane having a few succesful defences you mean 1 or 2 defences? because Hell in a Cell ppv is a few ppvs away..

Also we have seen them feuding over the title before, it was Judgement Day 1998, i think it was, and Austin was the guest referee...

I think their feud should end at SummerSlam, if its the rumoured Casket Match which we haven't seen, then it should definately end at SummerSlam... unless Kane wins and sets it on fire(again)...then we see a build up to Hell in a Cell which we also haven't seen, then it would be okay...However, there should not be a belt invloved, I enjoy their feuds without a belt, and the type of feud they might have, it doesn't need a belt to get it over!!

 

[Dave]

I don’t think this is a good idea at all.

Personally, I think that Kane and The Undertaker are past the part of their careers where they should be winning Championships. The same could also be said of Rey Mysterio but the WWE seems to think differently. However, I think that Kane and The Undertaker should now be doing what Triple H and Shawn Michaels were doing before he retired and that is putting people over.

I think Kane has a lot of momentum right now and it would be a shame to see him lose that with a feud with the Undertaker, which he invariably would. No one would buy Kane beating Taker in a Hell In A Cell match and I know I certainly wouldn’t.

I think that Kane and the Undertaker, if they are going to have a feud, should stay as far away from the World Heavyweight Championship as “humanly” possible. I think that making these guys feud over the title literally adds nothing to this feud. No, this feud, if it was to happen, would be more about motion than a Championship and adding a Championship to it is pretty selfish on the part of the competitors.

Give the Championship to someone else, like Rey, Swagger or Punk and you give them something to feid over, If a feud is to happen between Kane and the Undertaker, the last thing that is needed is a Championship added to that mix.

 

[Vincent Michaels]

So by Kane having a few succesful defences you mean 1 or 2 defences? because Hell in a Cell ppv is a few ppvs away..

Yes I do, 2 defenses can count SummerSlam, another gimmick or regular match at NOC, but then lose at HIAC, but after so many loses to Taker, 1 or 2 wins wouldn't be so bad.

Also we have seen them feuding over the title before, it was Judgement Day 1998, i think it was, and Austin was the guest referee...

Technically yes, they have fueded over the title, but that was just part of another storyline with Austin and McMahon. It would be nice to see them be involved in their own title fued.

I think their feud should end at SummerSlam, if its the rumoured Casket Match which we haven't seen, then it should definately end at SummerSlam... unless Kane wins and sets it on fire(again)...then we see a build up to Hell in a Cell which we also haven't seen, then it would be okay...However, there should not be a belt invloved, I enjoy their feuds without a belt, and the type of feud they might have, it doesn't need a belt to get it over!!

Who knows, maybe the rumors are true....just not the casket match part. These two could have a casket match, a LMS match, or other choices that have'nt been involved with these two. I think that it should involve the title, mainly because that's never really been the case in many of their fueds, and if their careers are coming to an end, then it might be now or never...but I can understand your's and everyone else's opinions.

 

[Canadian-BadAss]

i've always been a big fan of Both guys. but i think that they are avoiding a "major monster" charater right now, for the sake of the kids (gimme a break..) but i do believe Kane does deserve ONE title run before he retires (that one day thing doesnt count, neither does the WWECW title)

 

[Unsold Bacon]

After seeing Taker vs Kane for the 100th time it won't be as exciting anymore but I would like to see how it would work out now a days. I really don't feel this feud needs a title involved as much I would like to see Kane as World Champ for about a month jsut to give some more umph to his character once again.

 

[andyplatinum]

I think if Kane wins the smackdown mitb then he can wait a bit and then cash it in? If he wins it, admits he injured taker then we could see a hell in a cell match for the title are WM?

 

[The 1-2-3 Killam]

Well, I would prefer WWE surprise us with somebody else being the attacker. But since it's relatively certain that Kane will end up being the attacker because creative probably won't come up with something better, I guess it's not a bad idea. Supposedly Kane deserves a World Title shot...I'm not sure how true this actually is, because I'm not of the mindset that a guy should get a title shot just because he's been around forever. Granted, Kane has been doing great work lately, but there's so many guys on the roster who deserve to get their first real push. Are we really going to put the careers of Matt Hardy, Kofi Kingston, and Christian on hold because Kane needs to get the World Title run he's never been able to attain? Ok, so that's a little harsh. I suppose that those other guys do have plenty of time left, but let's think about the end of the scenario? Kane wins Money in the Bank, cashes in on Mysterio, and defends the title against Undertaker when he comes back. Maybe he'll get a month or two as champion, but do you really think the WWE will let him keep the title for that long, or defeat the Undertaker with the belt on the line? Here's my stipulation for Kane winning the title...

-Kane DOESN'T win the Money in the Bank. Let a rising star with MITB so they can easily sneak into the main event at the opportune time. Using MITB so quickly takes the tension and surprise away, and we won't have the cashing in to look forward to...
-Kane wins the title fair and square. After this Sunday Mysterio and Swagger have got to be done feuding. Let Kane challenge the champion at SummerSlam and give him the big win.
-Give Kane some time to feud with somebody before Undertaker returns. He's got some more time left on injury, so let's give him a good program.
-Have Undertaker come back and start the feud. If they really want to make it great, they could hold it out until Survivor Series. They both have a lot of history at that place, and wouldn't it be great if Kane would actually go over the Deadman?
-Let Kane BEAT the Undertaker for once.

It's not perfect, and I do like your idea of Kane and Undertaker fighting over the title, because it's something different from a feud we've seen so much in the past. It would also be the first time I can remember that Undertaker was chasing Kane...

 

[Vincent Michaels]

This is going exactly how I have predicted so far, Kane has won MITB, he has won his second World Championship, it's just a matter of time before we see,

If he will fued with Taker?

Will I be wrong and he enters a fued with Swagger?

Will he enter another fued with Rey?

How long will he keep the Title?

Who will he lose it to?

Discuss

 

[andyplatinum]

I can see a Kane/Mysterio/Swagger triple threat match for sure at the next ppv but after that I'm not so sure.

It's all about how long taker is going to be out for, cos I can easily see him coming back and fueding with Kane or even them teaming again if Kane isn't the attacker? Either way, it's nice to see Kane hold the title over people like Jericho/Edge and Swagger.

As for poor Mysterio, his title run was pointless - just like last time. He gained no momentum and was just given a stupid injury angle to play with. Just a transition champion I suppose?

 

[Morpheus101]

Taker vs. Kane @ Wrestlemania....why not? Yes, these guys have done it before, but not on the grand stage and not for the belt. Kane's recent momentum has propelled him back up to the top. Who knows what will happen when Undertaker comes back, or who "attacked" him, but I can't think of a more suitable opponent to feud with Kane for the belt, assuming Kane is successful at capturing the World Championship.

 

[theothersideofthestory]

The rumors that were heard where that it would be Taker vs Kane in a Casket Match (Original) But if it were to be anyone other than Kane vs Taker it would Swagger (only logical reason). Punk is injured and 90% we won't be at SS so that takes him out. Mysterio doing that much damage on a person? I don't think so. Swagger is the only legitamate answer other than Kane.

 

[ZIGZAGMAN13]

Dave when did you start watching wrestling? 2006? undertaker has been putting guys over, kane has been jobbing his whole career! Look at Triple H past, he has buried more people then he has put over! shawn michaels... im not even gonna talk about his past! But Undertaker, Triple H, Shawn Michaels are all legends and greats of the WWE

 

[R.K.Orton]

One thing i would like to see is Kane finally getting a convincing dominent win over the Undertaker. If they Feud i think Kane destroying the Undertaker would be good to see as when they have had previous run ins its been the Undertaker coming out on top. Kane is still a good character and one that could be refreshed and made believeable again if he puts away the Undertaker after so many failed attempts.

Only downside to that would be what would happen to Taker after the feud.


Personally id hate to see Kane pushed just to drop the title to taker in yet another poor feud like the rest.