Should Swagger have cashed his MITB in on Raw | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

Should Swagger have cashed his MITB in on Raw

While it is true that a live cashing in of Money in the Bank would have been the much better, I personally believe it is very cheap to blame spoilers for ruining the show for anyone. If you don't want the show to be spoiled, don't reads spoilers. I personally read spoilers weekly for both wrestling, movies and manga, yet I don't find myself unsatisfied with any of it. If people don't like spoilers, they shouldn't look into them. I find it more often than not that the people who complain about spoilers do nothing to avoid them, so if the show was by any means spoiled, it's not the spoilers' fault but your own. The reason why I believe Jack Swagger did not cash his briefcase on RAW, however, is due to the fact that Sheamus and Batista had only recently been champions in a similar fashion. Having Swagger cash it in on RAW would have meant the third time in less than a year that Cena would cheaply lost his championship. Now, I am no Cena fan, but even I would be bothered by that as it would only cheapen yet another championship reign, and what's more, Swagger being a World Heavyweight Champion right now is more credible than his being WWE Champion. His overall character is more suitable to go against Jerichos and Edges than Cenas, Batistas and Ortons. He did put on a great match against Orton last week, but his character is still not quite convincing enough to really be champion against those guys. This is not to demean Edge and Jericho. It's just that Jericho and Edge are in my opinion easier to wrestle credibly than the main event personnel currently on RAW. But it is not Swagger's cashing in his briefcase that bothers me, it's his winning Money in the Bank. Christian, McIntyre, and Matt Hardy were much better choices in my opinion. Legitimately speaking, those three are more credible superstars to not only win a ladder match, but also do a better job creating entire storylines around. Christian with that briefcase could have revived or even created so many possible new storylines. Same for McIntyre or Matt. Swagger's current push is at best mediocre as there really was not much of a storyline to go with it. However, with the upcoming Money in the Bank pay-per-view, I believe the rush was solely so that a new briefcase or briefcases could be distributed ending the WrestleMania card altogether in favor of an entire pay-per-view set around the ladder match itself. But even that's seems a bit too much. Money in the Bank should remain at WrestleMania or if nothing also, take place at TLC it being a ladder match with extra benefits.
 
Yea I agree. All surprise situations like this should all be done on Raw. If it's done on SmackDown there goes your surprise. On raw it's live no spoilers. I think they didn't have him cash it in on Cena is because I think there planning on keeping Cena WWE Champ for a while, like maybe a couple months, 4-5 maybe. That would be awesome considering we haven't seen one in the longest time. I think Swagger is going to be a good champ. I say he keeps it till Hell in a Cell where Undertaker takes it away from him.
 
While it is true that a live cashing in of Money in the Bank would have been the much better, I personally believe it is very cheap to blame spoilers for ruining the show for anyone. If you don't want the show to be spoiled, don't reads spoilers. I personally read spoilers weekly for both wrestling, movies and manga, yet I don't find myself unsatisfied with any of it. If people don't like spoilers, they shouldn't look into them. I find it more often than not that the people who complain about spoilers do nothing to avoid them, so if the show was by any means spoiled, it's not the spoilers' fault but your own.

I'm not blaming the spoilers because it spoiled the surprise for me I was shocked when irt happened and still watch Smackdown that week. What I was saying is people like to post spoilers on differnet sites so people that don't look at spoilers can read about it. I know this because I have done it a few time and some people don't like it. So I'm not complaining about the spoilers on my behalf its on the others behalf.
 
No, no no, a million times no, yes I do think we all thought he might have won it on Raw, but that wasn't the case, yes its live and it would have brought more of the audience on their side, but my reason to why he shouldn't have cashed it in on Raw is because of Cena, he is in now his 9th world title reign, him losing it will mean he wins it back at the next ppv to give him 10 world title reigns.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top