Samoa Joe vs The Undertaker

[www.suckmyarse]

There has been threads about Joe vs Batista and Joe vs Umaga...
What about Joe vs The Undertaker ??

This in my opinion would be a much more interesting match up due to Joe's martial atrs background and Undertaker's interest in MMA.

In the end though i see The Undertaker stading tall (after a good fight though) after planting joe with a Chokeslam and Tombstone...

Opinions..?

 

[Steve Corino]

Taker likes to put young guys over who deserve it and there is no doubt in my mind that Joe deserves it.

 

[Jrock]

Joe's fat ass wouldn't stand a chance

 

[ShaneRamlall]

It would be good match but i cant see either of these two men getting pinned by each other...But hell yeah they will make a great match..

 

[Jaycobo]

If they had the match, it would definetely be joe winnnin the first, then taker comin back and winnin

 

[DisturbedEwok]

yeah, with a feud like this, I'd see two matches, both winning one.

 

[MAGGOT]

this would be a great match both have good submission back grounds Joe is probably better at submissions though i'm not sure who would win but i guess i say Thee Undertaker would win

 

[PauLwaLL]

Blah... Is all I have to say... I dont know what the big fancy about Joe is... And where did you people get he's such a good submission wrestler... All I ever saw him do is his rear naked choke.... But as for the match Taker > Joe... Tho Joe would probably win if this match happened.... (Like someone said above... Taker puts people over) But I think Taker is the better wrestler of the two...

 

[Kasey]

Blah... Is all I have to say... I dont know what the big fancy about Joe is... And where did you people get he's such a good submission wrestler... All I ever saw him do is his rear naked choke.... But as for the match Taker > Joe... Tho Joe would probably win if this match happened.... (Like someone said above... Taker puts people over) But I think Taker is the better wrestler of the two...

Watch some of his PPV matches against Styles or Daniels. Unlike the TV matches, they aren't squash affairs and he gets to actually showcase his arsenal because he can actually go in lengths for more than twenty minutes, unlike most of WWE's wrestling muppets.

 

[Kasey]

It would be a clash in styles that I wouldn't care to see because Undertaker's gimmick reverted to the cartoony "Darkside" bulls**t. Do they teach MMA fighting on the Darkside? I don't know. I've always thought Callaway was overrated, but one man's trash is another man's treasure, I guess. Gimmicks like his are what always reminds me of when Shane Douglas appropriately referred to WWE as "cartoon-land." However, if they just booked a match between just Mark Callaway and Samoa Joe, I'd be interested in that.

 

[Dan1506]

Ok This Is Fucking Pisses Me Off.

Just Stop Right Now

First Batista>................ Okay Fine Its Arguable

But The Undertaker???????????????????????????????????

No Fucking Way. Impossible.

Lock This Thread Now!!!!!!

Even Tho Joe Bastard Does Have Skill Its Nothing Compared To Undertakers Skill And experience.

 

[Y 2 Jake]

Joe works a lot stiffer than Undertaker, I dont think Grandad Taker could handle it.

 

[wp2 4 life]

There has been threads about Joe vs Batista and Joe vs Umaga...
What about Joe vs The Undertaker ??

This in my opinion would be a much more interesting match up due to Joe's martial atrs background and Undertaker's interest in MMA.

In the end though i see The Undertaker stading tall (after a good fight though) after planting joe with a Chokeslam and Tombstone...

Opinions..?

OK this is how it is, In the ring it goes to the dead man but if the to have a fight JOE's gonna kill him.......................

 

[Kasey]

Joe works a lot stiffer than Undertaker, I dont think Grandad Taker could handle it.

He'd probably slip a disk after a forearm to his face.

 

[Kasey]

Ok This Is Fucking Pisses Me Off.

Just Stop Right Now

First Batista>................ Okay Fine Its Arguable

But The Undertaker???????????????????????????????????

No Fucking Way. Impossible.

Lock This Thread Now!!!!!!

Even Tho Joe Bastard Does Have Skill Its Nothing Compared To Undertakers Skill And experience.

Because the Undertaker is old and victim to one of the lamest gimmicks in wrestling history doesn't mean he can lace Joe's boots. If anything, guys like Randy Orton helped to keep Undertaker's fading career alive. Joe would do the same.

 

[Hazard]

I'd agree, in both their primes, this would be a great match up, i say Taker just for the fact he's been in the business longer.

 

[Dan1506]

No you just dont get it. You CAN NOT compare.

 

[sevastra]

No you just dont get it. You CAN NOT compare.

Obviously we can, cause we are. Undertaker MAY have been around longer, but longevity does not a good wrestler make. It just means your gimmicks have gotten over enough. If the udnertaker gimmick had not been well received...where would mr. calloway be now? Probably the poorhouse. You have to remember, Taker is good, but is severely over-rated when it comes to wrestling abilitie. Joe would take him from one end of the arena to the other. However, I still think it would be quite an entertaining matchup.

Winner would be Joe. And to paraphrase you dan "my opinion is right you guys are stupid for not agreeing with me..."

 

[Jewlz]

Undertaker has some good striking ability & is a quick striker for such a tall man, an actually fight i would give taker cause i've not seen Joe's striking ability but with Joe being shorter he could use to his advantage. how tall is Joe?

 

[doublej_TNA]

Well they both suck so I dont care. Fake gimicks! a "deadman" dressed in normal cloths and a Goldberg ripoff!