Jack-Hammer
YOU WILL RESPECT MY AUTHORITAH!!!!
As is the case with a number of wrestles who've worked for bigger companies and parted ways on less than amicable terms, Ryback hosts a podcast that he uses as a outlet for his bitterness and generally hurt feelings. Ryback's made a number of podcasts, many of which involve the usual formula of painting himself in the role of a steadfast, upright hero taking on the evil corporation and the members of management who derive pleasure from screwing people over.
Ryback's claims in his latest episode that Triple H told him that WWE doesn't want to create or use marquee stars because the company wants to keep them from attaining "economic freedom." He alleges that, during his first contract negotiations, Ryback was told by Triple H that "we're never going to have another John Cena." Ryback would later say that "And if you look, that's why they book guys the way they book them. They don't want guys to have too much power anymore."
I agree with Ryback in the sense that he seems to be implying that WWE wants to maintain more leverage during contract negotiations. However, that's not a sign of WWE necessarily looking to fuck someone over, but rather it's a company conducting business like a company. After all, I'm sure every wrestler who signs with WWE would love to have a seven figure downside guarantee but that's not gonna happen because it's just not good business.
Ryback's claims of WWE not wanting to create/use marquee stars falls apart quickly when you consider WWE signing wrestlers who were making big money in Japan and who came to WWE because they'd be making bigger money like AJ Styles and Shinsuke Nakamura. It also doesn't jive with the sort of pushes we've seen for guys like Roman Reigns and Kevin Owens over the course of the past few years. Roman Reigns was very much looking like he was on his way to becoming the next John Cena before he violated WWE's Wellness Policy and he may very well become Cena's heir apparent yet whether some of us like it or not.
Creating marquee stars isn't an exact science; companies sometimes push the wrong wrestler with the wrong storyline, use the wrong gimmick for a wrestler, push someone too soon, etc. because that's simply the nature of the business. It's nothing new or unique to WWE despite various dirt sheet writers all but coming right out and saying otherwise. When a wrestler gets opportunities, is able to make said opportunities pay off time after time and gets fans behind them, that's going to give said wrestler some degree of influence within the company; there's no way around that because if that wrestler is able to consistently make big money for the company, said company is going to want to keep this wrestler for as long as they can.
Personally, I don't want to see another single star built up to the level of John Cena in the sense that I don't really want another single "face" of the company. I've said in other threads/posts that I'd rather see WWE have a good half dozen or so guys who're able to step up to the main event spot with the ability to consistently remain there. John Cena's star burned so bright and he was protected to such a degree that it was detrimental in some ways because it got to the point where a lot of fans outright snickered at the notion of someone having a shot of putting one over on Big Match John. During the Attitude Era, you had guys like Austin, Rock, Taker, Triple H, Angle, Jericho and possibly Foley as main event regulars during that time who could fill the void if needed. I'd like to see WWE move back to that and it looks like just might be as there's Styles, Owens, Reigns, Rollins and Jericho as definitive main eventers. Some liked Ambrose in the spot, some didn't, though I think Ambrose is someone who'll slip in and out of the main event picture while maintaining a level of star power like Jericho. Bray Wyatt has the ability to be a main eventer, Sami Zayn has potential, Strowman is coming along nicely as the next monster, etc. Right now, none of these guys are built up to such a dramatic degree that the others lack the credibility to face each other, beat each other and hold the main event slots.
Ryback's claims in his latest episode that Triple H told him that WWE doesn't want to create or use marquee stars because the company wants to keep them from attaining "economic freedom." He alleges that, during his first contract negotiations, Ryback was told by Triple H that "we're never going to have another John Cena." Ryback would later say that "And if you look, that's why they book guys the way they book them. They don't want guys to have too much power anymore."
I agree with Ryback in the sense that he seems to be implying that WWE wants to maintain more leverage during contract negotiations. However, that's not a sign of WWE necessarily looking to fuck someone over, but rather it's a company conducting business like a company. After all, I'm sure every wrestler who signs with WWE would love to have a seven figure downside guarantee but that's not gonna happen because it's just not good business.
Ryback's claims of WWE not wanting to create/use marquee stars falls apart quickly when you consider WWE signing wrestlers who were making big money in Japan and who came to WWE because they'd be making bigger money like AJ Styles and Shinsuke Nakamura. It also doesn't jive with the sort of pushes we've seen for guys like Roman Reigns and Kevin Owens over the course of the past few years. Roman Reigns was very much looking like he was on his way to becoming the next John Cena before he violated WWE's Wellness Policy and he may very well become Cena's heir apparent yet whether some of us like it or not.
Creating marquee stars isn't an exact science; companies sometimes push the wrong wrestler with the wrong storyline, use the wrong gimmick for a wrestler, push someone too soon, etc. because that's simply the nature of the business. It's nothing new or unique to WWE despite various dirt sheet writers all but coming right out and saying otherwise. When a wrestler gets opportunities, is able to make said opportunities pay off time after time and gets fans behind them, that's going to give said wrestler some degree of influence within the company; there's no way around that because if that wrestler is able to consistently make big money for the company, said company is going to want to keep this wrestler for as long as they can.
Personally, I don't want to see another single star built up to the level of John Cena in the sense that I don't really want another single "face" of the company. I've said in other threads/posts that I'd rather see WWE have a good half dozen or so guys who're able to step up to the main event spot with the ability to consistently remain there. John Cena's star burned so bright and he was protected to such a degree that it was detrimental in some ways because it got to the point where a lot of fans outright snickered at the notion of someone having a shot of putting one over on Big Match John. During the Attitude Era, you had guys like Austin, Rock, Taker, Triple H, Angle, Jericho and possibly Foley as main event regulars during that time who could fill the void if needed. I'd like to see WWE move back to that and it looks like just might be as there's Styles, Owens, Reigns, Rollins and Jericho as definitive main eventers. Some liked Ambrose in the spot, some didn't, though I think Ambrose is someone who'll slip in and out of the main event picture while maintaining a level of star power like Jericho. Bray Wyatt has the ability to be a main eventer, Sami Zayn has potential, Strowman is coming along nicely as the next monster, etc. Right now, none of these guys are built up to such a dramatic degree that the others lack the credibility to face each other, beat each other and hold the main event slots.