Report/Rumor: Top Five Matches For Wrestlemania

[LODemolition]

Lol @ people hitting the panic button and putting their tickets up for sale already, based off internet rumors. The only match on this list that we can all pretty much agree is definitely happening is CM Punk vs Triple H. They've already put the wheels in motion on this match with Punk calling out Kane. The rest are pure speculation for now. Like I said earlier, nothing can be set in stone because they're supposedly in negotiations with Sting. If he signs, that can change everything.

 

[Mitch Henessey]

Overall, that's an unflattering set of matches together, and I'm hoping we're just looking at pure internet speculation, or WWE tossing around some ideas for early planning stages. The only two matches that stand out as "must-see" for me are Lesnar VS Undertaker and Triple H VS CM Punk. I could do without everything else.

Bray Wyatt is not ready to face John Cena at Wrestlemania yet, because no one is going to buy Bray as a legit threat to beat Cena at Wrestlemania. Maybe another pay per view like Extreme Rules, Payback, or Battleground, but Wrestlemania? No. To add to that, with the way things are now, and if Bray convincingly loses to Bryan, I'm not sure Bray VS Cena is worthy of a main event spot on one of the lower level pay per views.

Bray needs to build up an unbelievable amount of momentum from now to Wrestlemania to create any real buzz for a feud with Cena, and I can't picture a scenario, where Bray dominates Bryan tomorrow night, because Bryan is white hot now, and WWE can't take another chance of killing his momentum.

Although, I will admit, the thought of promo duels between these two is intriguing. Mic work is Bray's greatest strength, and when he's not trying to crack corny jokes, Cena always brings his A-game in promos, especially during go home shows. On top of that, Cena is the ideal corporate man to represent "The Machine," but no one is going to believe in Bray having a snowball's chance in hell of beating Cena at Wrestlemania.

I have zero interest in Batista VS Orton for the title. Unless Bryan pops up in the Rumble, Batista winning is a foregone conclusion, because he needs the momentum more. His return didn't blow the roof off of the arena, and you can say his act as the musclehead is stale. Orton VS Batista never had that marquee match up feel in the past, and nothing changed this year, when you consider the reaction Batista received during his return.

Bryan VS Sheamus? They had an incredible five star worthy match at Extreme Rules in 2012, but Bryan VS Sheamus feels like a setback for Bryan, when you consider his run last year. Also, I don't trust WWE. I'm sure they'll use the eighteen second squash from Mania 28 as a building block for this feud, and this will be the perfect chance for Bryan to get his revenge. Knowing WWE, they'll waste a great opportunity for the chance to return the favor with Bryan topping Sheamus' time from Mania 28 with another quick squash to embarrass Sheamus.

 

[JJ15776]

Lol @ people hitting the panic button and putting their tickets up for sale already, based off internet rumors. The only match on this list that we can all pretty much agree is definitely happening is CM Punk vs Triple H. They've already put the wheels in motion on this match with Punk calling out Kane. The rest are pure speculation for now. Like I said earlier, nothing can be set in stone because they're supposedly in negotiations with Sting. If he signs, that can change everything.

Hilarious, isn't it? We don't know how they would build up to these five matches, let alone if these are even the five matches that would happen. If you're buying tickets with the intention of selling them if the card isn't exactly what you wanted to see months in advance, then you're an idiot and shouldn't be buying tickets in the first place...oh, and I'm going to go ahead and say you actually don't have tickets in the first place. This is just the next step up from all the people who love to say "I'm not wasting my money on this card" even though they buy it anyway.

This was the rumored card for WrestleMania 29 before the 2013 Royal Rumble:
The Undertaker vs. CM Punk
The Rock(c) vs. John Cena for the WWE Championship
Triple H vs. Brock Lesnar
Sheamus(c) vs. Randy Orton for the World Heavyweight Championship
Chris Jericho vs. Dolph Ziggler
Big Show vs. Ryback
Rey Mysterio vs. Sin Cara
Team Hell No(c) vs. Prime Time Players for the WWE Tag Team Championship

Eight rumored matches, three happened. I'd be very surprised if more than 2 or maybe 3 of these five matches happened.

I could see CM Punk vs. Triple H for sure. Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar seems like a good possibility. Randy Orton vs. Batista maybe, though that's definitely not going to be a one on one match for the title(more on that in a sec). Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus? Can't see it. Not that it's a bad match or that it couldn't work, this would be a popular match with the Universe at large even though Sheamus gets severely underrated by the IWC, but Bryan seems destined for a title match at WrestleMania. John Cena vs. Bray Wyatt? Absolutely not going to happen. John Cena is not going to be in the fourth or fifth biggest match of the night. Plus, either Daniel Bryan or John Cena will be in the WWE World Heavyweight title match. There is no chance in hell neither one of them is in the main event title match. None. Zero. Zip, zilch, nada.

At this point, a triple threat(Orton-Batista-Bryan, Orton-Batista-Cena, Orton-Bryan-Cena...or Orton-Batista-Bryan-Cena?) seems quite likely, given that Orton has faced Bryan and Cena so much lately, but who knows. Orton may not even be champion then. Cena vs. Bryan one on one for the title could happen too. Then Orton-Batista but not for the title, plus CM Punk vs. Triple H and Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar? Now, that makes a lot more sense than these five matches.

 

[Kidpolean]

To everybody saying that they want Bryan vs Lesnar or Bryan vs anyone besides Orton with Bryan winning the title....I promise you that it is not happening. There is NO WAY IN HELL the title changes hands twice in three months. Only way DB walks out of WM with the belt is if he beats Orton. If Cena wins at RR than you can kiss that dream goodbye. If Lesnar wins at EC than you can kiss that dream goodbye as well. Pretty much if the title changes hands at all than that man is walking out of Mania with the belt. I for one dont want to see Orton vs DB at Mania, so im happy that DB wont be in the main event.

 

[Hard Hit Prince]

You said that
"neither one of their matches were a straight out single match to see who's in fact better" but thats why people would want to see daniel bryan vs orton... so they can face off in a 1v1 match with a clean finish. And you talk about the built in story for orton vs batista, but thats and old rehash while daniel bryan and orton really have unfinished buisness. There was never a true cap to there fued.

Randy Orton and Daniel Bryan have been in the same ring in more than 6 single matches in the past year. Batista isn't in the WWE for over two years and doesn't fight Orton since 2009 - you can call me crazy, but there is absolutely nothing that would make me want to watch DB vs. Orton once again, specially since it was one of the worst feuds of the year and specially where the PPV buys were some of the lowest ever, not the past few years, EVER.

You also talk about the daniel bryan winning the title being too predictable. But there are plenty of other mania matches that were predictable that were the best possible choice. Stone cold winning at wm 14 and 15, shawn winning at 12, bret winning at 10, hell even batista winning at 21. Just because you can predict the outcome, doesn't mean it shouldn't be done.

Yes, but none of them were pretty much built on being "the underdog" and none of them were "flavors of the month". Last year it was an outrage that CM Punk didn't main event, oh god the blood that argument spilled and yet, WrestleMania 29 was one of the most successful events in the company history. This year will be exactly the same - Daniel Bryan isn't in the level of the guys you mentioned and it is ridiculous to even compare it. He has a nice little chant going with the "YES!" and the majority of fans do it, because it's fun to interact and if Bryan is there, people have a reason to chant "YES!". You see indy shows, TNA or whatever and people like to chant "YES!" too and there is nothing to do with Daniel Bryan - the chants don't mean squat as far as a measurement of Bryan's popularity. Remember, people used to chant Fandango's theme song too whenever he was on TV.

Last i have to comment on you saying you like daniel bryan as much as the next guy. Obviously you don't as he is the most over guy in wwe and the majority would like to see him at the top (and you can tell that by the crowd reaction each week). And he needs to finally get that spot, or the people will lose faith in him. Very few people have gotten as over as daniel bryan is right now. Bryan being in a mid card match would make no sense at this point. Its like putting austin in a mid card match at wm 14.

I do and I probably like the guy more than little kids pushing for him to be in the main event of WrestleMania. I don't want him being forced down people's throat and once he gets at the peek, there is absolutely no reason at all to pull for him. He has done it and that's it, once he does it, people are going to chant for someone else. Daniel Bryan is a fine fine wrestler and his match against Sheamus is the best thing he could have possibly be doing since The Undertaker is already occupied with Brock Lesnar.

People will lose faith in Bryan the same way people lost faith in CM Punk after his 434 day title run and bare in mind that CM Punk is a lot more talented than Bryan when we consider all the factors since wrestling ability, to charisma, gimmick and promo. Daniel Bryan winning the title or not winning will put him in the exact same spot he's and you better recognize that now and enjoy the product. If Daniel Bryan could pull what John Cena and other big stars can, he would be the main event - however he can't. Vince McMahon loves Daniel Bryan and therefore he's putting him in the best spot for him and going over Sheamus at WrestleMania is a big deal. Sheamus isn't your average midcarder, Sheamus is an outstanding draw for kids demographic specially. Just because you and other half-witted minds don't like Sheamus doesn't mean that he isn't a very talented performer and a popular one. If anything Sheamus main event run was more successful and he put SmackDown ratings steady when he was on top there, while Daniel Bryan tanked.

John Cena needed one year to one year and a half to start generating money and him alone is 20% of the companies revenue. 20%!! Do you think that if Vince McMahon had a guy that could make him more he wouldn't? Cena is close to be the most valuable brand in WWE's history above Steve Austin and Hulk Hogan. Not being a bigger draw than Cena isn't a bad thing, is pretty much impossible. Accept that and accept that Bryan's talents are way better used in the uppercard spot. Also put in your mind that Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus is a main event match and WWE is giving you five of those in case you don't like some.

 

[JoeyJoeJoe]

IF TRUE, once again, it just means that WWE is dictated by part time wrestlers who deign to alight on their branch for a few weeks out of the spring.

Putting Batista in a World Title match? The fuck why? A few minutes after his big entrance he usually reminds everyone about how much he actually sucks in the ring.

Bryan Vs. Sheamus. Yeah, whatever. This above all makes me doubt the whole thing.

Undertaker Vs. Lesnar and Punk vs. HHH have been the only matches discussed for awhile and don't come as a big shock.

Cena Vs. Wyatt. Pretty damn underwhelming, IMO.

Big ol' collective bag of meh.

 

[AnthonyM4]

That is a very underwhelming card. I guess this spoils the fact that Batista is winning the Rumble? Why the hell is John Cena facing Bray Wyatt? Is wwe not aware how over Bryan is and should be headlining(and winning the title)? Daniel Bryan vs Sheamus is a stale match as is Batista vs Orton. Out of all those I'm looking forward to Lesnar vs Undertaker the most. That match hasn't happened in years. It's too bad their great HIAC match from 2002 is forgotten.

 

[Pedigree1]

We all know that Punk Vs Trips is all but booked so thats a no brainer. I like that match and feel its the right time for Trips to put over CM Punk. Triple H, is a legend not that CM Punk needs the win but a win over a future HOF like HHH is a huge coo. Taker vs Brock i have major concerns with. Given Takers age and such taker is in no condition to be taking on Brock at this point in his career.

Brock works a very physical match,and is very stiff. I dont know if Brock can take care of undertaker without hurting him physically. Batista vs Orton,i guess I will have to accept it,given its damn there a lock batista will win the Royal Rumble. It seems like a slap in the face and very disrespectful if Batista headlines WM this way.. Two or three other guys deserve the spot not batista who left after throwing a hissy fit.

Bray Wyatt Vs John Cena,no thank you on this one. This a huge step down for Cena,as he is the supposed face of the company and Bray is no where near ready to have a main event spot at WM! Bray could be one of the minor reasons if CM Punk leaves,Bray main events WM but CM Punk has never main evented?? But thats another topic.

Daniel Bryan vs Sheamus. A While back,these two put on a great feud but that was when the both of them were on equal footing. Its not the case anymore,sheamus was tumbling down the ladder,while Bryan was a star on the rise.. This is a step down for Bryan no offense against Sheamus,but he has been injured while Bryan is one of the top two stars behind Cena. Im fine with this match taking place after WM,after Bryan becomes WWE WHC Champ but not now. Also for this feud to happen again,Sheamus must be a heel for this in order for it to work.

 

[Limitless]

The Card is alright, but I am sure this is not set in stone. Brock and Taker will be cool, as I both like them in the ring... should steal the show.

What is the obsession with D-Bryan? I mean I have watched wrestling for years and can admit that he is a solid mid-card talent. Lets be honest though, WWE champs should look legitimate. Daniel Bryan does not look like he could beat Cena, Brock, Taker, Ect. Kevin Nash said that wrestling sort of died when Benoit and Eddie became champs. It is kind of true, considering who most of our world champs have been. Daniel is a solid worker, but should not be World Champ. He will get over without it and doesn't need the belt, plus it makes the wrestling image look bad.

 

[LODemolition]

To everybody saying that they want Bryan vs Lesnar or Bryan vs anyone besides Orton with Bryan winning the title....I promise you that it is not happening. There is NO WAY IN HELL the title changes hands twice in three months. Only way DB walks out of WM with the belt is if he beats Orton. If Cena wins at RR than you can kiss that dream goodbye. If Lesnar wins at EC than you can kiss that dream goodbye as well. Pretty much if the title changes hands at all than that man is walking out of Mania with the belt. I for one dont want to see Orton vs DB at Mania, so im happy that DB wont be in the main event.

No way in hell? I'd say there's at least a chance, considering it happened last year (Punk losing to The Rock at RR, Rock losing to Cena at WM).

Plus, if Lesnar were to win the title at EC, there's no way he's staying champion past Mania with his limited appearances. That 6 week window between EC and WM is all they could allow him to remain champion for.

And as far as Orton vs Bryan goes, I don't think we need to worry about seeing that one again. If Orton goes into Mania as champ, it's pretty likely he'll be defending against Batista. They already began to set it up on Raw last Monday.

 

[Bernkastel]

That card just sounds so dull, especially with all the story lines going on at the moment. Personally I'd rather see Punk vs Orton at Mania for the title rather than Bryan get his hands on it yet. I'm assuming that's the payoff to this whole Punk vs Authority storyline. A match with HHH just seems incredibly lazy. It would like if Austin faced Vince at WM 17 instead of the Rock. As for Bryan I'd love to see his feud with the Wyatts come to a close at Mania. Having it end tomorrow just makes the booking and all Bryan's cheers just seem kind of empty. And if Bray were to lose like that at RR is anyone really going to take him seriously against Cena of all people? Of course not.

I'd much rather see Taker face Cena than Lesnar, just for the simple reason that the quality would be much better. Lesnar would probably accidentally injure Taker in his old age, and the match would still probably be "B" grade at best. Hopefully this card doesn't turn out to be real. There's just so much of it that doesn't make much sense at this point.

 

[mr. jomo risin]

WWE T Brock Lesnar vs. Daniel Bryan
The Undertaker vs. John Cena
HHH vs. CM Punk
Batista vs. Orton (but no strap!)
Warrior vs. Ryback? Fine.
Rhodes vs. Goldust? Please!
Throw in Bray Wyatt vs. Sheamus
Shield triple threat
and utilize that mid-card with a ICT/UST Unification Ladder Match BAM!

 

[SodaPopinski84]

While we all know that things can change before WM, the rumored card makes sense. That is not to say that I agree it is the best WWE can give us, because it is not, but lets consider the following...

Batista winning the Rumble seems the only realistic option right now. There is no guarantee Bryan will even be in the RR (from what I have read), and even if he is, the chances of him winning are unlikely, given his match vs. Wyatt. CM Punk is not a logical choice to win because his contract status is up in the air at this point. Hence, WWE is going to play it smart and not invest in Punk as the main event when there is no guarantee he remains with the company past the summer (although I think he will likely sign another 2 year contract). I am sure WWE just paid Batista a large sum of money to return, and given that his return is at the RR itself, WWE is not going to have him lose during his return.

Herein lies the problem with WWE post 2002. It has been increasingly popular over the years to bring back old superstars on a part time basis. The Rock, Jericho, Batista, Lesnar, etc. Personally I hate it. Either you are with the company, or you are not. If you are going to be with the company, put in the work for what you are getting paid. I have little interest in seeing a 45 year old Batista come back and win the Rumble, but it is what it is. They are not bringing Batista back at the RR for any other reason than for him to win it and headline WM. Personally, I believe this is a slap in the face to the full time stars, especially the younger ones. Even a guy like Cena, who has carried the business for 10 years now, has to be disappointed in this. So, Batista v. Orton, will be the main event.

I think we can all agree that it will be Punk v. HHH at WM. There seems to be little doubt and dispute about this.

The other part of the problem is that at Mania, with all the returning stars, WWE has too much superstar power. After those two matches we are left with Cena, Bryan, Taker, Lesnar, Seamus, Shield, Wyatt, Golddust/Cody, Big E, etc. Obviously, you cannot have everyone main event. Bryan is obviously the most over guy in the business right now. I love watching him work. But, I will say that before his feud with Bray Wyatt, he was starting to get old. He does a lot of the same moves in the ring each match. Because Vince and co. do not view him in the same light as guys like Lesnar, Orton, Batista, he will not main event. So, as much as everyone wants him to wrestle for the title, its not gonna happen. He will not be in the main event.

Taker is getting old, so his options are limited.. They are not gonna have him wrestle Bryan because the fans love Bryan way too much. Plus, Bryan just did a face turn, so they are not going to have face v. face. They will throw him in there with Lesnar because Vince and co. believe it will draw the most views. For the same reason, they will not throw Taker v. Cena. They want Taker to wrestle a heel, and Lesnar is the only real option.

This leaves us with Cena, Bryan, Wyatt, Seamus, etc. While I personally hope they come up with something better than Seamus v. Bryan and Cena v. Wyatt, it seems like this is what we are being set up for. Cena deserves better for WM 30. Bray Wyatt is one of the worst wrestlers I have seen, since I started watching again after a 10 year hiatus. His match vs. Kane was probably the worst match I have ever seen. The gimmick is good, but he is terrible.

So, unfortunately this card does seem to make sense. Hopefully creative can make it interesting and switch things around on us...

 

[Kidpolean]

No way in hell? I'd say there's at least a chance, considering it happened last year (Punk losing to The Rock at RR, Rock losing to Cena at WM).

Plus, if Lesnar were to win the title at EC, there's no way he's staying champion past Mania with his limited appearances. That 6 week window between EC and WM is all they could allow him to remain champion for.

And as far as Orton vs Bryan goes, I don't think we need to worry about seeing that one again. If Orton goes into Mania as champ, it's pretty likely he'll be defending against Batista. They already began to set it up on Raw last Monday.

Yes there is NO WAY IN HELL...

Last year was a completely different situation. CM Punk had just come off of a historic run when he lost to The Rock. The Belt was used as a symbol of passing the torch to Cena at WM29. That is 3 champions within about a year and a half.

Now lets compare that to this year, Orton won the wwe title in October than won the unified title in December. Lets say Brock wins at EC, what the hell would be the point of him doing that just to hand DB the belt at Mania? Its not a passing of the torch because Brock doesnt have the torch to begin with. This scenario makes no sense. The unified title was created in December, so that would mean that in its 4 months of existence there would already have been 3 different champions. The wwe isnt dumb enough to do this. Orton will beat Cena, than beat Brock probably with the help of whoever Brocks Mania opponent will be and Orton will still be champ at Mania. With Orton as champ, the wwe would NEVER EVER have him and DB face off again after that terrible feud they just had especially in the main event of Mania so whomever thinks that this is a possible WM main event is delusional.

The only way DB main events Mania is if....

A. Cena wins the title at RR
B. DB wins the RR

But even then, DB will absolutely lose this match. He has already beat Cena clean at summerslam and this would be Cena's chance to prove that he can beat DB.

So in other words, there is no way from a logical booking standpoint to have DB walk out of WM with the title. Im sorry but it just aint happening.

 

[AustralianBroski]

I think this isn't the real card. At the biggest WrestleMania of all time why wouldn't they have arguably their biggest star of all time in the WWE WHC match?

Still think Bryan will be a surprise entrant in the RR match. While Cena goes over Orton. So we have Bryan vs Cena for the WWE WHC at Mania.

 

[SodaPopinski84]

We also need to factor in that some of these rumored matches that have been mentioned may also have stipulations. Bryan v. Seamus...I'm not interested. But throw them in a ladder match or something of the like and it may be more interesting. Not ideal...but we must also consider ways WWE may try to enhance the card. Considering it is WM XXX I am confident Creative, led by HHH and Vince's direction will find a way to make it memorable.

 

[hatehabsforever]

Personally I call bullshit on this supposedly "finalized" card which is allegedly set in stone for the grandest stage of them all. In fact I would not be remotely surprised if neither one of these five matches actually occurs at WM 30. For one thing, it pretty much gives away much of the evening for the Royal Rumble PPV tomorrow night, and I cannot imagine leaks of this magnitude would be allowed with under 24 hours to go before (arguably) one of the biggest shows of the year. It also doesn't allow for developments which could occur, albeit unlikely, over the next couple of months.

I cannot imagine John Cena versus Bray Wyatt could possibly be on the card for this milestone version of Wrestlemania. This outcome would not be remotely in doubt, and I for one cannot imagine John Cena not being in the main event, or for sure the second most significant match of the evening, and it simply don't see Wyatt versus Cena being that significant. Cena may not be in the title picture for the night (although I predict he will be) but I have to think he will not be used in a capacity as lackluster as this.

I continue to be skeptical of Brock Lesnar versus the Undertaker as well. I realize it's been talked about here and elsewhere for some time, but I don't believe that Taker is up for such a stiff and physical challenge at this point in his career, even if it is only one night of the year with another full year to recuperate in all likelihood. Plus, while I certainly am not convinced that Sting is finally making the jump, I cannot imagine they aren't at least looking at it and possibly striving to make it happen, making any plans involving Taker anything but set in stone until they know for sure one way or the other what is up with Sting.

So many guys on here are categorically convinced that we will see CM Punk versus Triple H in New Orleans, but I've grown skeptical of this as well. I see Triple H versus Randy Orton as a more plausible match up for WM30, especially if Orton loses to Cena tomorrow night.

Daniel Bryan is on a roll like so few before him have seen. Surely they have more planned for him than a matchup with a guy who has been out for months and has hardly been missed? I simply don't see Sheamus versus Bryan again at WM. Been there, done that.

And I don't predict Batista as being the winner of the Royal Rumble this year, especially after his lukewarm reception upon his return to RAW last week. I have difficulty believing that a guy who has been gone for several years just walks back to the company just before the Rumble and is fast tracked to a title shot at a milestone version of the biggest show of the year.

The alleged card lacks any pizzazz, any particular wow factor, and I for one see this as a major red herring to throw the fans off from the results of the event tomorrow night, as well as to deceive and work the fans regarding the actual potential card for the night. After all, Wrestlemania 30 presents the opportunity for the unthinkable to happen and turn the world of professional wrestling upside down, so leaking a phony card to hide the true game plan seems to be a logical and likely possibility here. At least I really hope so.

 

[RicSpade]

Considering people had been reporting Taker requested to work with Bryan I wanted Bryan to end the Streak this year but oh well it is what it is. I figured Batista would face Orton unless something desperately changes at the Rumble, I think Lesnar vs. Taker may be ok, but I think I would've liked to see Lesnar take on Cena again. I think Punk vs. Wyatt would've been awesome however I appreciate a Punk triple H feud too...

 

[TJ-BITW]

Punk vs. Triple H is a match that's, allegedly, been "set in stone" for a while now. Given how Triple H screwed over Bryan during his feud with Orton, I think I'd rather see him in this feud with Trips. That's not to say that this can't be a great feud though and I do hope they use some of their past history in the build.

Nothing about the entire card that interests me. As for Punk-HHH feud, if they are going to dig into some past history then I wont be surprised if they bring back Kevin Nash as a surprise entrant at Royal Rumble as well.

 

[Redrum]

Its a decent card that would be good for any other PPV and heck a decent one for some other WM's but not 30

Orton vs Batista: Could be a good build but its a part timer vs the champ

Brock vs Taker: Worried if Brock will legit hurt taker and if WWE is worried enough they have to make sure Brock dials it back to the point it would not be a good match to watch. Brocks draw at this point is a very physical and brutal match,something i dont think Takers body can safely do anymore.

Sheamus vs DB: Again decent with a decent build but for the third time and you will have the man who tons of people want in a big moment face Ginger Hogan for what? Avenge his 18 second loss? Oh boy and that's assuming he wins even if he did it's not really the WM moment most of his fans wanted.

Punk vs Triple H: No issue with this one

Cena vs Wyatt: Not sure its good for Wyatts development to be put in a big match with Cena at WM. I am afraid either way you go it will turn out bad. If you have him go over Cena i am afraid you push him too fast and it sets him and creative up for a big pit fall. On the other hand if you have him lose he is fed to Cena and his momentum will take a hit as "the superhero has beat the evil cult guy"

 

[OrionDown]

Its not bad, but for me comes down to the wrestlers/creative team.
and honestly, idk what else they do. My dream WM match this year was bryan and punk, but im a wrestling fan. Honestly, Cena not main eventing is a good thing. Shows character on his part. He can main event for titles when ever he wants. Wwe answers to him, its obvious. So for him to take a back burner at WM 30, for a new up coming wrestler, IS HUGE, this is where Bray can show if his a long term player or just another gimmick. I'm not a cena fan, but respect to him. Its like fandango and Jericho last year. Now bryan and sheamus, im fine with, i felt cheaped out twice. One match got back burned, and the other one was a blink of an eye. This is a way for 1. Bryan to redeem himself and 2. Get a great show out of these two.
Punk and triple h, i wish it was Bryan, it make a lot more sense, and the yes chants would be nuts. Honestly i switch punk and bryan if i could, but i still really like this match idea, and its Triple H, he wants to be in Mania, specially number 30.
Taker vs Brock, if this was 2004 i would be so excited for this match, but taker is beat up and old, and a guaranteed to win and brock is way to aggressive in his matches. Brock will dominate the match and loose to hell's gate most likely.
Batista vs orton. This is a match that will be meh. can be good in 1 WAY. i'll explain in a moment. Batista return had him a great contract. It helps wwe to bring back a big superstar, plus it helps Batista with his new marvel movie being released. Now for him to have a 2 year contract, he probably wanted the main event for the title at maina, and thats business boys. How this could be good. What if, orton becomes baby face, and Batista heel. Authority sees more "wwe face" in him. Better built, his a movie star, his "better" for the company. What if Batista is sent to win at Mania with authority backing him up, and Orton on his own. THAT would make the story much better.

Remember, there is still matches left for the S.H.I.E.L.D, rhodes brothers, IC championship match, legends match of course a divas match and grudge match.

match i'd like to see happen...

Roman vs Dean for the U.S TITLE, seth rolins in Deans corner.

 

[#HELLNO]

This card, I can not get invested into. Why would they need to have Triple H in another match at WrestleMania? I mean he is no Undertaker, so he should stop trying to be one with all of these one off appearances on PPV's. (And I don't include TV in there). The only match out of the 5 that have been listed that I am the slightest bit interested in is the Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar match & the only reason is because it has been teased since UFC 121 (It needs to happen). As for the other 4 they are not appealing at all. Nobody cares for Batista winning the Championship again, his return was poorly booked, him Batista Bomb was more like a Jackknife & his promo was so boring.

This is how my card would pan out;

The Streak Match
The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar w/Paul Heyman

WWE World Heavyweight Championship
Randy Orton(c) vs. Daniel Bryan vs. CM Punk

For control of the WWE (Cena is Vince's pick) With Kane as the Referee
Triple H w/Stephanie McMahon vs. John Cena w/Vince McMahon

Batista vs. Alberto Del Rio

Triple Threat Match - United States Championship Match
Roman Reigns vs. Dean Ambrose(c) vs. Seth Rollins

Career Match (If Goldust loses he must retire)
Cody Rhodes vs. Goldust

WWE Tag Team Championships
The New Age Outlawas(c) vs. The Wyatt's vs. The Usos vs. The Prime Time Players

WWE Divas Championship
AJ Lee(c) vs. Tamina Snuka

WWE Intercontinental Championship - Pre Show
Big E Langston(c) vs. The Big Show

 

[Ap3x_Pr3dator13]

that rumored card is atrocious, this is WRESTLEMANIA 30 for god sake's...they should go all out and make this the BIGGEST WrestleMania ever and let it go close to 5 hours like WM XX:

this would be my card:

WWE World Heavyweight Championship:
Brock Lesnar (c) vs. Batista

John Cena vs. Undertaker

Daniel Bryan vs. Shawn Michaels

CM Punk vs. Triple H

Sheamus vs. Randy Orton

Six-Man Tag Team Match:
The Shield vs. The Wyatt Family

Goldust vs. Cody Rhodes

Fatal 4-Way Match for the WWE Tag Team Championship:
New Age Outlaws (c) vs. Big Show & Rey Mysterio vs. Jimmy & Jey Uso vs. Jack Swagger & Antonio Cesaro

10-Man Ladder Match for the Unified Intercontinental / United States Championship:
Big E Langston (c) vs. Dolph Ziggler vs. Kofi Kingston vs. Bad News Barrett vs. Christian vs. Rob Van Dam vs. Chris Jericho vs. The Miz vs. Fandango vs. Damien Sandow

Divas Championship:
AJ Lee (c) vs. Paige or Emma

now that would be one incredible WrestleMania line-up!!

 

[Redrum]

After tonight the rumored card is looking more legit. If so man idk if i will get the WWE network i will just watch matches some other way that wont cost me money or just read the results. This is a PPV card not fitting a major WM milestone which they have decided to make WM 30.

 

[rge2010]

A decent looking card but extremely underwhelming.

Randy Orton vs Batista
I don't really have any issues with this. Looks like a solid match for the Title.

Brock Lesnar vs The Undertaker
No issues with this match. Looks really solid on paper. Cant wait to see Brock try and end the streak. They are building Brock big.

CM Punk vs Triple H
Looks decent on paper, but a mixed elimination tag match would wet my appetite more. Maybe team Triple H with New Age Outlaws, Kane and Kevin Nash. Punk can have Big Show, Dolph Ziggler etc. Make it a 'team match'

John Cena vs Bray Wyatt
A really strange match for Mania 30. If CM Punk vs Triple H is a 1 on 1. I would look to get Hogan involved in this in a 2 on 3 match.

Daniel Bryan vs Sheamus
This is just terrible booking. No idea why they would book this.