Raw Christmas Episode | Page 5 | WrestleZone Forums

Raw Christmas Episode

Which deems their advertisement a lie and thus, would make them guilty of false advertising. REAL brilliant plan there.


they didn't advertise anything. the vendor did

art of surprise and lack of predictability is what scores ratings my friend

not to mention, wwe false advertises all the time
 
Looking back at it now, a Big Show New Year's Baby moment would have been great if he was in control.

A lunatic tycoon gimmick would be refreshing.
 
they didn't advertise anything. the vendor did

And I suppose the vendor just decides what or who to advertise without any word from the promoters?

art of surprise and lack of predictability is what scores ratings my friend

Wrong.

not to mention, wwe false advertises all the time

No, because WWE uses the term "card subject to change." However, advertising a returning star just to sell tickets before saying it was false is either A) False advertising or B) Simply lying to the fans.
 
Here's something else to notice:

Langston and Reigns have both been protected and they're building up that first showdown. Now, why does it work so well? Because it's not clear who would win. Both guys have been built up as unstoppable monsters that couldn't possibly lose a fight and it's fun to see who is better.

That's booking 101 right there and it's so easy to do.
 
Thank goodness. I would have lost it if Ambrose was pinned AGAIN.

Speaking of which, why is ROllins so protected?

Because when they break up WWE realizes he's the most likely to get lost in the shuffle. That's why commentators have been saying he's the most underrated etc. He's come leaps and bounds though and he could play a good face when it's all said and done.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top