Putting someone over Vs Making them look good

[Tired0FthePeople]

And yet you've taken the view that the taste of yourself, an admitted part of the minority, is a better thing to base the broad concept of "making someone look good"

i did no such thing. The point of the thread was to ask what others thought. My original post said "you may seem like Im passing my ideas off as fact but I actually asking because I may be looking at things the wrong way."

You're selfish and missing the bigger picture.

LOL. Selfish? I'll leave that one. But its strange that you'd accuse of missing the big picture (how main stream fans think) at this point when Ive said twice now that I 'got it.' I'll do it a third time. I got it...many people only care about a wrestlers status, not his skills or ability and that alone dictates if you can make someone look good or not.

I'm a bigger fan of Daniel Bryan than I am of John Cena. I think Danielson's ring work is more enjoyable to watch. Doesn't mean I think Daniel Bryan has fuck all to offer John Cena in terms of looking good.

As your views on what is required in order to make another wrestler look good are established, I suppose you wouldnt.

Im not a moron.

Nor I.

See: I didn't misunderstand anything.

Not interested in proving you wrong, so...ok, if you say so.


Also, Cena is a better wrestler than Daniel Bryan like Michael Jackson was better than Prince or like Pepsi is better than Coke. We all have our preferences.
Its strange that you'd say Id like Cena more if he looked like Daniel Bryan but did the same thing. Really strange, but, whatever. Would I like Kaval more if he looked like Shaemus or would I like Husky Harris more if he looked liked Jack Swagger? Im trying to follow the thought process on how these wrestlers look physically and what it has to do with how much I like their ring work.

 

[Stormtrooper]

LOL. Selfish? I'll leave that one. But its strange that you'd accuse of missing the big picture (how main stream fans think) at this point when Ive said twice now that I 'got it.' I'll do it a third time. I got it...many people only care about a wrestlers status, not his skills or ability and that alone dictates if you can make someone look good or not.

See, it actually has nothing to do with talents. Mainly because John Cena is a better WRESTLER then Daniel Bryan. Bryan is a better TECHNICAL WRESTLER, but that does not mean he's a better WRESTLER.

As your views on what is required in order to make another wrestler look good are established, I suppose you wouldnt.

It's not Coco's "views" on making someone look good, he's actually talking about how you make someone look good. Cena made Dolph look good by just sharing the ring with him, and making him look like he belonged. Cena did similarly when he added Daniel Bryan to the Summerslam team, and it would do the same if they were to go at it at some point. Chris Jericho made Daniel Bryan look good on the premiere of NXT Season 1. The guy that doesn't belong is made to look good when he is given a shot against the better (kayfabe or not) opponent.

Nor I.

Maybe not, but here you are trying to prove otherwise.

Also, Cena is a better wrestler than Daniel Bryan like Michael Jackson was better than Prince or like Pepsi is better than Coke. We all have our preferences.

No, Cena is better then Daniel Bryan like LeBron James is better then Chris Bosh. Or like how X-Box 360 provides better graphics then Nintendo Wii. Or how Wrestlezone Forums is better then every other Wrestling Forum.

 

[Tired0FthePeople]

I dont want to turn this into a 'who's a better wrestler' discussion. As for everything else you (and Coco) have said, all I can say is I understand your points of view and thanks for sharing them.