klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
How are fans not gonna know Jeff Hardy is a multi-time World Champion if the commentators boast it all the time? I realize it happened in WWE, but what do you expect? Get a big name from a larger organization and expect him to look inferior to your own talent knowing full well that would be a negative move?
That's just it: they shouldn't. "Hey this guy used to be awesome in another company and so did this guy and this guy in this guy." Well if that company was so awesome and has so many awesome people in it but these guys here aren't awesome enough to stay there, how awesome are the guys staying there? TNA needs to be TNA, not the company where WWE guys go. In other words, don't talk about WWE.
How do you expect a fan do discover TNA without knowing of WWE's existence?
Channel 41: CNBC. The economy sucks. We know.
Channel 42: BET. I hate rap.
Channel 43: MTV. Oh look they're showing music. How boring.
Channel 44: Spike. Holy shit why is a guy in a mask holding a board full of nails in it? That's freaky looking!
Like that.
He's a big name and commentators make his credentials clear.
That makes sense. Why show what he can do when we can talk about what he did before?
TNA has to acknowledge Jeff's history in WWE because it is a larger company
No, they don't.
They can't hide it.
Jeff was also the OMEGA Champion. I didn't learn that from TNA. Why didn't I learn that from TNA? They never said it. It's really not that hard to not talk about it.
Tell that to ECW, WCW and ROH. You can't expect a wrestling promotion to acquire a big time name that was in a larger company and totally pass up on milking it for their own benefit
Milking it is one thing. The cow is currently begging for a break from now raw the udders are from TNA suckling on it.
It would be like if Sting finally debuted in WWE and WWE just made him look like new talent instead of the legend we know he is.
You mean like CM Punk, the indy superstar that debuted in WWE almost five years ago and has never once had his indy career talked about and yet is a three time world champion?
Really? So we should just watch with no clues as to who's in the ring and why?
Yeah you're right. I mean it's not like we can figure out what's going on or who is good or their style by say, watching them wrestle. Such a crazy idea.
I doubt it. All I needed to know was that he was a World Champion that hasn't had the title in TNA.
See that's the thing: Why does him being a former champion have ANYTHING to do with what he did? If Anderson had been the one that turned it would have been the same: he wanted to finally win the title. By saying he's won it before it adds nothing but takes away from this being what he FINALLY needs to do to get the title.
Think of it this way: Jeff is a three time former champion, meaning he was good enough to win before but needed help now. In other words he's not as good as he used to be. If this is his first win, it means he wasn't good enough before but now he is. What sounds better: Come see a guy that is better than ever, or come see a guy that isn't quite what he used to be?
Promo packages help.
Not when you have so much stuff going on during a show that you don't have room for more than three minute matches.
But they know of TNA? Come on, KB. I realize what you're saying, but do you really expect a first time wrestling fan to be hooked with TNA before learning of WWE?
Absolutely possible. New fans, people that love wrestling but hate WWE, people that started watching WWE after Hardy left, people that were casual viewers etc.
Comparing it to the Taker/Kane feud. WWE's audience is now composed mostly of kids. That means the chances of them knowing who Paul Bearer is are very slim.
According to my reviews, since Summerslam the feud has been recapped with a video explaining things 7 times, including an explanation of who he is. Striker has said who Bearer is, that he's Kane's father, that he's not Taker's father, and that Taker allegedly burned down Kane's home as a child on multiple occasions. The stories have been WELL explained more than once to any age of fans watching.
We never ha a damned clue why Steve Austin turned in WM 17
JR to close out Mania:
Stone Cold has sold his soul to the devil himself to win the WWF Title!
Austin from the next night on Raw:
I went to Vince McMahon as a form of an insurance to make sure I got what I wanted and Vince McMahon will continue to be in my corner from now on.
Twice in 24 hours after the end of the show including once on the show.
Why did Austin do it? There was no real explanation other than to secure the title. Same thing falls here.
Not to mention the package that aired before the match where Austin said
I need to beat you Rock. I need more than anything that you can ever imagine.
Austin would do anything to win the title because he felt he had to win. He asked Vince to help him because he felt he couldn't do it himself, which you could figure out easily based on what either Austin or Ross said that night. FAR different.
If you'd like a better example, the formation of the NWO. That night Hogan gave the famous interview explaining why he did what he did. If you wanted to know who the third man was and why he did what he did, you had to order the show. In this case you can find out who THEY were and why they did it for free on Impact. Zero need to order the show because you get nothing special there other than a shock.
"I wanted the title so badly that I sided with the bad guys"? Doesn't sound complicated at all.
It also sounds nothing like the explanation you gave.
I think a casual fan might make sense out of it faster than us. "That jerk was so desperate to win that he cheated". In essence, that's all you really need to know.
And there is no way that's all TNA will give us because TNA will overcomplicate things, as they already have by having Hogan be the star of the segment rather than Hardy.