Ultra Awesome
Im standing in Brooklyn/
Over the past decades we have seen many wrestlers get the chance of a life time by being a part of the company that has established so much with the guidance of Vincent Kennedy McMahon. I'm sure it is safe to say that it IS every wrestlers dream to jump ships to the BIGGEST company of them all. A company where dreams come true and others come to an end...I am talking of course of the WWE.
Now over the many years the WWE has existed, there have been rival companies to try and take them down. Companies of course being WCW, and its current foe, TNA. In these companies, existed (exists) a good number of top stars that have made history (or on the verge of making history). However, it goes without saying, that any wrestler that wants to be "at the top and have more exposure", is more likely to succed by being in WWE. Don't get me wrong. I am not dis-crediting WCW, nor TNA, nor any other wrestling company for that matter. I am merely saying, a wrestler has a better chance of accomplishing more if he or she were in WWE.
But that's not what this thread is about. No. So please don't start going on and on about "but WCW/TNA did this!"..."You don't have to be in WWE to be a great star!"..."People like Sting accomplished more because he wasn't in WWE!..."Vince only elevates the people he likes!"...Please don't do that or anything of the sort...
The point (question) of this thread is this:
If you were to choose one person from TNA or any other company including the independent circuits to switch to the WWE...who would it be?
There is no limit to why you should pick the person...I would prefer it if you would choose the person based upon who has the most to gain from WWE (as this was why I made the build up to the question above). But it could be simply because you would just want to see them there....or even because you want him (or her) to feud with someone currently in the WWE...Hey, whatever turns you on...
Now over the many years the WWE has existed, there have been rival companies to try and take them down. Companies of course being WCW, and its current foe, TNA. In these companies, existed (exists) a good number of top stars that have made history (or on the verge of making history). However, it goes without saying, that any wrestler that wants to be "at the top and have more exposure", is more likely to succed by being in WWE. Don't get me wrong. I am not dis-crediting WCW, nor TNA, nor any other wrestling company for that matter. I am merely saying, a wrestler has a better chance of accomplishing more if he or she were in WWE.
But that's not what this thread is about. No. So please don't start going on and on about "but WCW/TNA did this!"..."You don't have to be in WWE to be a great star!"..."People like Sting accomplished more because he wasn't in WWE!..."Vince only elevates the people he likes!"...Please don't do that or anything of the sort...
The point (question) of this thread is this:
If you were to choose one person from TNA or any other company including the independent circuits to switch to the WWE...who would it be?
There is no limit to why you should pick the person...I would prefer it if you would choose the person based upon who has the most to gain from WWE (as this was why I made the build up to the question above). But it could be simply because you would just want to see them there....or even because you want him (or her) to feud with someone currently in the WWE...Hey, whatever turns you on...