Because he has done exactly shit since late March/early April?Why the fuck should he not get a title shot? Becuz some dumbass pimply faced, sly marks like to sit on the internet pretending like they know how to run the WWE ???
In storyline terms, how has he earned a title shot? EVERYONE else in the WWE has to "earn" their shot...except the Undertaker and Triple H.
So has Hacksaw Jim Duggan. Where is his title shot?Let's try the fact that he's been wit the WWE for almost 2 decades
You're right. He's just going to come out at the end of the Punk match (like Royal Rumble 2006) and insert himself into a feud with Punk...but never actually wrestle for the title.Who in the fuck said he was geting a title shot?? Did Vince or anybody even fucking say that he was getting a title shot. Nobody even said that he was getting a title shot.

Again, READING. Try it.Be thankful he's making that belt look prestigious by even going for it ... but it doesn't matter becuz MARKS like you think you know everything about the WWE so you're gonna sit her & bitch anyways just cuz your life is pathetic!
I'm not talking about the business side right now, I'm talking about the storyline side. In WWE stories, wrestlers have to earn title shots by winning matches, and working their way up the card. It's arguably the most basic tradition in the wrestling business. But the Undertaker? He can win a match 4 or 5 months ago and just randomly insert himself in the title picture and get title shots? How the fuck does that happen?
Do me a favor. Before you reply with another dumbass post, sit for a moment and actually try to comprehend what I'm saying here, and learn to differentiate the difference between storyline and business.