New Years Revolution no more?

Colamania

Finally. Colin has come back...
Source: Wrestlezone.com

As of right now, there are no plans on holding a New Year's Revolution PPV next year. It will be interesting to see where the Elimination Chamber match will show up.

The following pay-per-view dates have been confirmed for 2008:
Royal Rumble - 1/27/08 (Madison Square Garden)
No Way Out - 2./17/08
Wrestlemania 24 3/30/08 (Citrus Bowl)
Backlash - 4/27/08
Judgment Day 5/18/08
One Night Stand 6/1/08
Vengeance 6/29/08
Great American Bash 7/20/08

Good decision or not? I don't like it, but that's just because we get NYR free here in the UK, so we got the Elimination Chamber free every year. Although, the last 2 (including the ECW debacle) have sucked.

So, where do we think the chamber will appear next? I think it could return to Summerslam myself.
 
I think it should be on One PPV and One PPV only and that's S. Series. Just think about it it's the only PPV that make since because it's a Elimination type of match.
 
NYR had some great historic Moments like that one when Edge became the Champion or HHH became the Champion. Weird how WWE is pulling out the ECW December to Dismember and the NYR PPV.
 
NYR had some great historic Moments like that one when Edge became the Champion or HHH became the Champion. Weird how WWE is pulling out the ECW December to Dismember and the NYR PPV.

Maybe finally Vince is going to give wrestlers some time off during Xmas season...
no...I dont think so. But could be.

About the elimination chamber, you could have it on any small PPV (Vengeance, Judgment Day or ONS) just to get more buys. it isn't about the PPV really, but the Elimination chamber itself.
Hell, why not Wrestlemania??
 
I'm personally down the middle on this, as I like having more p.p.v.'s, (as long as they have great matches) yet there have been a couple that outside of one or two matches truly haven't lived up to anything.

E.C.W.'s December to Dismember was a complete p.p.v. nightmare. Cyber Sunday, last year to me, was awful. New Year's Revolution, however, is becoming a nice cornerstone.. especially to start off the year, right before the Royal Rumble. It gives the Rumble some nice hype.

Anyways, on the flip side.. if they do away with it.. then they can focus more on the Royal Rumble being the first official p.p.v. of the year.. which should more or less be the one to kick everything off.. cause its the beginning to the build up of Wrestlemania.

As far as the Elimination Chamber goes.. well, if W.W.E. is insisting on keeping One Night Stand.. then I fully see that being the new found home for the most recent gimmick match. Since ONS is no longer an E.C.W. p.p.v.. its more or less just an excuse for W.W.E. to stack the line-up with a gimmick for every match, therefore.. the Chamber to end the event.. along with a ton of other gimmicks would probably sell the crap out of that p.p.v.

I mean, I'd buy it regardless cause I get them all.. but I'd LOVE to see a ladder match, street fight, last man standing match, then top it all off with the Chamber.
 
I believe the WWE should put the Elimination chamber match on a small Pay per view because a match like that could cause for more fans to by that Pay per View. I agree one night stand would be the best fit because that is a pay per view full of gimmick matches so why not have the elimination chamber match last.
I believe cutting down on the Pay per view is a good, it can lead more build up to the next one for example they wont have to lead into feuds really fast right after one of the pay per views are finished. this will cause more build ups and possibly better cards because the wwe wont be forced to just throw people in a match and hopefully its a good one. so therefore i think they can focus on the RR being the first pay per view of the year.
 
I think this was a good move for many reasons. they need to get rid of One Night Stand and Cyber Sunday too. with soo many ppv's wwe should get rid of the less important ones. no need to have that many ppv's every year IMO.
 
Okay, so 12 (one a month) is good for a year.. but which should stay & which should go? Just because the typical line-up since 2004 has been..

1. Royal Rumble, 2. No Way Out, 3. Wrestlemania, 4. Backlash, 5. Judgment Day, 6. Vengeance, 7. Great American Bash, 8. Summerslam, 9. Unforgiven, 10. No Mercy, 11. Survivor Series, 12. Armageddon

Does that automatically make this the prime line-up? I don't think so. I think out of this line-up, Judgment Day should be switched out for One Night Stand. At least the concept. I mean, One Night Stand & Cyber Sunday offer gimmick matches & unique quality.. Judgment Day for the past several years has been crap. Its just a filler for p.p.v.'s. I mean, think about it.. Backlash is coming off WM.. & Unforgiven is coming off Summerslam. No Mercy is building up Survivor Series & Armageddon is finishing out the year, building for the following. Judgment Day is the worst out of all of them.

"I" personally like them to do away with the Great American Bash, move Vengeance back to July.. & bring back the King of the Ring tournament. Especially with the quarter finals, semi finals & finals all being in the same night. I miss the KOTR tourneys, like 93-95, when they focused on the actual tourney.
 
Just been thinking and this is what i would do

Armageddon Hell in a Cell each year at Armageddon for Smackdown

Elimination Chamber at Backlash for a Raw main event

keep survivor series with the survivor series match up as its main event

One night Stand should have an ECW main event maybe a 4 way dance or a 6 way dance as long as it was one of those type of matches and i wouldnt mind about the number of participants, also have every match be a specialty match but with a hardcore twist like a weapons filled steel cage or a fall count anywhere.

Vengance should be a Night of champions as its gimmick

Royal Rumble as obv the Rumble

Wrestlemania should have the Money in The Bank

No Way out should be the last opportunity for the title to change and should have a no1 contenders match for the show who dosnt win the Rumble

Unforgiven should be a specialty match show have maybe a triangle ladder match and should have a casket match or a buired alive match and stuff like a cage match ect.

Do whatever with the rest make one of them have a Divas specialty match tho every year

Get rid of udgment day it has no point and i cant think of a gimmick or specialty match for it and get rid of Cyber Sunday make it a special Raw because thats all it is its like a high quality Raw but low quality PPV

Replace Judgement Day with the KOTR tournament, damn it was cool and a high quality PPV and when shane o mac got suplexed through the glass i loved that have all 3 brands involved and have the KOTR winner get a championship match of his choice at the next PPV but they can only choose from there brands titles. Also have the WWE ECW AND WHC in a champions match but not for the belt just a champion vs champion match.
 
i don't like this idea b/c the fact that this ppv was pobably WWE's most innovative PPV. i dnt care where the elimination chamber goes really to tell you the truth, hopefully it will be @ WM, SummerSlam, or Survivor Series.
 
I like the idea of not having a New Years Revolution anymore as it ads more hype for the Royal Rumble. Plus story lines wont be rushed so much after Survivor Series and they can fully develop and lead to finales at Wrestlemania. I mean this PPV has been more of a build up for the RAW brand the last few years anyways and well I dont see the point and you all talk about gimmick match like the Elimantion Chamber it wasn't used last year and that is once in while match anyways.

It fi was up to me I get ride of No way Out as well as its a waste of air space .
 
Great decision. that PPV was pointless. Why buy that when you can buy one of the big 4 three weeks later? I never understood it. As a whole the events haven't been very memorable. And you can tell there desperate for buys when they put the E.C. as the main event. The feuds didn't really need an EC match. It was to increse buys.
 
Thank God. Finally, the WWE realizes something is wrong and they can't get the buys they want. Eliminating Cyber Sunday, D2D, and NYR is a step in the right direction.

So this leaves us with the big 4, which won't go anywhere.
and a total of 13 pay per views. I would love to see it get down to ten, but I doubt that will happen. 13 is still a tad to much, but it's one every four weeks on average, if they do it right.

Glad to see the WWE is attempting to do something different.
 
It makes sense to drop NYR if they're going to keep the idiotic tri-brand PPVs...NYR was only created because they need a PPV for Raw between Survivor Series and Royal Rumble.

Not sure why everybody keeps bringing up the Elimination Chamber, it's not like it was a NYR only match. It hasn't been at every NYR (wasn't there last year) and there have been 3 EC matches not at NYR...the first was at Survivor Series, the second at SummerSlam, and the embarassingly shitty Extreme EC at December 2 Dismember.

I do like the idea of tying the Elimination Chamber to a certain PPV...perhaps Vengeance if they make that a Night of Champions every year. It not, then maybe Survivor Series, although I'd prefer traditional Survivor Series matches. Why not SummerSlam? That's the only one of the Big 4 that doesn't have a unique speciality match now that WrestleMania has Money In The Bank.
 
Great decision. that PPV was pointless. Why buy that when you can buy one of the big 4 three weeks later? I never understood it. As a whole the events haven't been very memorable. And you can tell there desperate for buys when they put the E.C. as the main event. The feuds didn't really need an EC match. It was to increse buys.


I'd like to note at this point that we've never had to pay for NYR here in the UK, and therefore I have no idea what Jake is talking about, he gets it for free.

Hmm... eliminating NYR is a good idea IMO, it was just pointless filler anyway, it took away from the value of the RR.

D2D = Total crap, we all know that they'll never make the mistake of doing that again.

However, i've always liked the concept of Cyber Sunday. I think we should fuck with it. Seriously. The amount of people on this forum, if we all voted as often as we could, we could make every match cmplete shit, then laugh at the poor saps that buy it. Seriously though, it being the fan's choice is a great idea in my book, and i'd like to see it stay.
 
with the exception of the first one all NYR's have been crap i like the idea of cutting it its too close to the Royal Rumble to get buys anyways

I do like the idea of tying the Elimination Chamber to a certain PPV...perhaps Vengeance if they make that a Night of Champions every year. It not, then maybe Survivor Series, although I'd prefer traditional Survivor Series matches. Why not SummerSlam? That's the only one of the Big 4 that doesn't have a unique speciality match now that WrestleMania has Money In The Bank.

i like that idea give Summerslam a specialty match like they have for the other big 4. but what would be cooler than an elimination chamber would be a war games match maybe at an upcoming survivor series because they are 5 on 5 matches just with two rings in a closed cage. It would be smart to bring this out because its something young fans have never seen before and something older fans remember and love
 
i think NY Revolution was the least of WWE's ppv problems with Cyber Sunday, December 2 Dismember, and One Night Stand still running around.

Cyber Sunday was a cool concept for the first few years (when it was know as Taboo Tuesday), but then became sucky and too crammed in between No Mercy and Survivor Series. I agree with WWE's idea to make it a special 3 hour RAW instead, as USA network executives love those things, and at one point wanted RAW to always be 3 hours(which would suck!) I mean come on, K-Fed closing a ppv? Thats bullshit times 4.

December 2 Dismember was a bad idea the day someone came up with it. Whoever though ECW could hold their own in a single brand ppv without blowing is a huge challenge. At least One Night Stand has that special ECW aura to it (excluding this year..), and had good matches in it. One of the better matches to this ppv didn't even have ECW superstars to it! (Hardy's vs. MNM) The Extreme Elimination Chamber was perhaps the worst ever next to 2006 NYR. They didnt even have one of the main attractions to the match wrestle in it with Sabu being replaced by Hardcore Holly! WTF? Then they have two other fan favorites taken out early in the match with RVD and Punk so the fans would cheer Lashley. The "Extremeness" of the Chamber was barely even showed as they almost never used the weopons. The other matches were basically shit.

One Night Stand used to be a great ppv with all ECW wrestlers in the Hammerstein Ballroom, but is sinking downhill after this years ONS. In 2005,we had:
-Sandman\Dreamer vs. Bubba\D-Von Dudley
-Sabu vs. Rhyno
-Lance Storm vs. Chris Jericho
-Psicoisis vs. Mysterio
-Super Crazy vs. Tajiri vs. Little Guido
-Masato Tanaka vs. Mike Awesome
-Appearances from many ECW alumni

Then things got a little toned down in 2006:
-RVD vs. Cena for the WWE Championship,
-Sabu vs. Mysterio for the World Championship
-Dreamer\Funk\Beullah vs. Edge\Foley\Lita
-Angle vs. Orton
-Balls Mahooney vs. Masato Tanaka
-F.B.I. vs. Tajiri\Super Crazy (Big Show's ECW debut)
-Taz vs. Jerry Lawler

Finally, in 2007, we get the okay WWE ONS: Extreme Rules:
-WWE Champion Cena vs. Khali (Falls Count Anywhere)
-World Champion Edge vs. Batista (Steel Cage)
-ECW Champion Vince McMahon vs. Lashley (Street Fight)
-World Tag-Team Champions The Hardy's vs. The World's Greatest Tag-Team (Ladder Match)
-RVD vs. Orton (Stretcher Match)
-Dreamer\Sandman\Punk vs. Burke\Striker\Marcus Cor Von (Tables Match)
-Women's Champion Melina vs. Candice (Pudding Match)
-Mark Henry vs. Kane (Lumberjack Match)
You can tell that year after year this ppv has less ECW in it, and more gimmicks and WWE wrestling. I just hope next year's is better as its stuck in between Judgement Day and Vengeance, so WWE doesn't have much time to hype it.

On another tone, lots of people have been talking about getting rid of Judgement Day because the last 5 or so sucked pretty bad. I dont think that would be the best of ideas right now, with the "one ppv a month" rule coming into play with the exception of One Night Stand. If they took this ppv away and put ONS in it's place, that would be fine also, but ppv's with history around them, usually stick around excluding the KOTR Tournament which Ill get to in a second. Its not the ppv's fault for getting bad match-ups, its just the way things turn out sometimes. Give it another shot at success.

And finally, The King of the Ring Tournament should NOT be brought back as a ppv, and ill tell u why. It used to be a great ppv, when WWE had less ppvs, but now that they have almost all pretty established pay per views, there's no room for another ppv without contradicting everyone wanting less ppvs. I think it should be a tournament held on all brands on TV, throughout the course of the weeks following up to the Rumble, SummerSlam, or Survivor Series. That way the semifinals and finals of each brand can be presented on certain ppvs as another way to get more ppv buys. The tri-branded finals would be a triple-threat match with one wrestler from each brand. The winning wrestler would get a title shot at their brand's top championship at the next major ppv (RR, SS, SS.) It would make all fans happy and give great match ups and rivalry set ups for every brand. An example would be: Tommy Dreamer beating Elijah Burke in the first round, only to have Burke screw Dreamer at beating the next guy in round 2, thus setting up a rivarly. I would have maybe on KOTR match on each brand per week, so it doesnt get rushed. It would be a great way to kick off the road to the Royal Rumble also, with the longer you stay in the tournament, the better your entry number in the Rumble is, unless you are the winner of course. Another idea would be to have the elmination style of Survivor Series play a role in it somehow. Or it could just be an even better way to hype up SummerSlam. The oppurtunities are endless and its much better than shelling out another $40 to buy another ppv. The only downside I would have to say, is that the wrestler's wouldnt have to wrestle more than once per night, which I personally like to see wrestler's stamina get tested by putting on 2 or 3 great matches, but oh well.

I think this is just about it for now:)
Feedback would be appreciated for those who actually read the whole thing.
 
I'd like to note at this point that we've never had to pay for NYR here in the UK, and therefore I have no idea what Jake is talking about, he gets it for free.

It's not free. It's free for you because your parents pay for Sky or Cable. I on the other hand pay £40 a month for a subscription. And considering I only have it for the wrestling £40 is a lot of money.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top