Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Okay, I will. When was the last time that guy drew? I'm thinking early 90s. Fact is, he WAS the icon. He was the face of wrestling maybe 3 generations ago. Today, when the general person thinks of wrestling, they think of either Stone Cold Steve Austin, The Rock, or John Cena, because these guys were here when wrestling was at the height of its popularity, while Hogan and his friends were effectively killing WCW.
WCW had worse times than that my good man, trust me, when the Crocketts were still running it, they overexerted themselves with business acquisitions like the UWF (Bill Watts old company, which is how Sting got his big break) then Ted Turner saved the company by buying it in 88. For the next few years they still struggled but Turner was willing to cover the losses.
When Hogan got there in the mid-90s for a guy that couldn't see to draw part the earlier part of the decade like you claim, it seems he did a pretty damned good job with what's that angle again...oh yeah the nWo. Yeah Hall and Nash were important to that, but seriously the third man could have been no one else, it had to be Hogan, it worked and it sold.
As far as Hogan aiding in WCW's demise, I call bullshit on that one. There were bigger factors with WCW, in fact Eric Bischoff and Fusient media would have been more than happy to take the financial losses Turner Networks had to endure and they would have ran the company while Turner networks kept WCW programming on the air, in fact even in its worst days WCW was still drawing better numbers than anything Turner had on its networks. The fact is Turner lost controlling interest in WCW and the company was losing money but Turner networks would have had nothing to lose if they kept the programming on the air and sold the company much like Jim Crockett did in the 80s to Ted Turner. But AOL Time Warner and the programming president said no go, and again all they would have had to invest was advertising dollars while Bischoff and his investors would have been in charge of the company and owning it. Granted I can surely say that the financial losses did not motivate AOL Time Warner to keep it running, but considering viewership was still rather good there would have been no harm in keeping them on the air, even if they had to eliminate one or two programs to do so.
Hogan still has a presence
oh as far as Hogan's profile amongst general wrestling fans, why would he be on the cover of WWE All Stars if the common wrestling fan today would not know who he was? Granted he shared the cover with other superstars, but a guy who's not even with WWE is on the cover of a WWE wrestling game, that should tell you something. Seriously...
oh and sorry kid but John Cena didn't show up on the scene until AFTER the Monday Night Wars were said and done...(Summer of 2002 is when he made his debut, he was never around when WWF and WCW were going at it, which is what I assume you are referring to as the height of wrestling).
That's debatable. What's worse, having 10 dollars and losing 9 dollars, or having 10 million dollars and losing 9 million?
Yeah, it worked. When it happened. It worked, peaked, declined, and stayed on a course of rapid decline for like 5 years.
So basically, you read Bischoff's book, and took his word that the only problem with WCW was Time Warner? Nothing to do with the bland, ridiculous storylines, nWo, hemorrhaging money, the WWF being better, the politics, "inmates-running-the-asylum" policy, the lack of communication between anybody running the show, and the lack of anyone except for Hogan and the people he liked going over in any and every match?
But okay, Time Warner had it out for Bischoff and Time Warner, and they're the only reason why the WCW doesn't exist today.
I think some of the vitriol we see from folks here is based on their desire to see the good old NWO days again. We constantly see people harken back to the brilliance of Bischoff, Russo, Hogan and company during their run with Turner/WCW. What those folks continue to find trouble coping with is that they failed. At the end of the day, WCW FAILED!!! They lost and WWE won! Simple as that. No spin, no amount of debate is going to change those facts.
My suggestion is that people simply move on. The truth NOW is Hogan, Bischoff, and company are NOT out-drawing the WWE in any way, shape, or form. And it's not likely they will anytime soon. Hogan doesn't like VKM and wanted his own deal. Well now he's got it. He's been there what a couple of years now? Still no significant bump in anything, so it's clear his glory years are now behind him.
Time to build new stars Hulkie and move on with your life. (and for you old school NWO fans as well.)
Just the same, if Turner hadn't bought JCP, there would be no WCW kid. Granted you weren't even a gleam in your daddy's eye when all this was going down, so I'll give you something of a free pass since it seems like you're not one for the history of the business and are probably conditioned to believe everything you read on the internet.
It still worked though, say what you want bitch all you want but WWF was given a real run for their money with the storyline and it worked, you can't dispute that fact. No matter how tired the angle got, but of course it's not like WWF could ever do any wrong, right?
Uh no, I actually looked at the numbers WCW was pulling and granted it wasn't anything great compared to the nWo heyday but they still had viewership. Don't ever underestimate the southern wrestling fan base, there were still plenty of WCW fans even if the numbers weren't as great. WCW was sold to Fusient originally and not the WWF and there was an intention to keep the company running on TBS and TNT.
If you need some education like most smarks do then here you go:
Canoe Wrestling Covers WCW Sale to Fusient
WCW Fusient Media Press Release
WCW Nitro Ratings History - (Again I know WCW had some really lame storylines and not everything Hogan did was gold, but still WCW still had viewership even if it wasn't record setting.)
Jamie Kellner Drops WCW from programming at Turner - From New York Times
This information pre-dates Eric Bischoff's book by YEARS. So nice try on calling me out, too bad you fucked it up. Like the great Roddy Piper said never throw rocks at a man with a machine gun.
I never said anything about Time Warner having anything out for Bischoff you stupid fool, I'm just telling you that wrestling was obviously not on the list of programming that Turner Networks wanted to have. Again, a huge cost would have been saved by them with having to run the company, but given the fact that there was still a decent enough amount of viewership compared to the rest of the programming they had on their networks, they would have had nothing to lose by selling to Fusient and keeping WCW on the air, it was a long running staple on their programming.
I can't wait to see your rebuttal, smark.
WCW did not fail, it was a long running company that went through a lot of different owners over the years and sadly lost its supporters like Ted Turner, the company's roots go all the way back to 1931 as Jim Crockett Promotions and lasted until 2001 when WCW was sold to WWF. And if you don't think the same thing can't ever happen to WWE, trust me it can. Don't be so blind to the history of the wrestling business that any company is immune to a rise and fall.
I'm not looking for the nWo to come back, but I am just making observations that people like you and other fans can't seen to wrap your heads around the concepts of. That's not my problem, that's yours.
What's your problem, dick? This is a wrestling conversation, not a cockfight. Chill out.
I don't even know what you're trying to say here. The fact is, WCW didn't get shut down simply because the TW guys didn't like the product. It's because it was bleeding money and it was a terrible product at the state it was in.
And the WWF would have lost if it were for the countless mistakes and stupid decisions. I never said the WWF did everything right, but you can count on the fact that the WCW made an infinite amount more mistakes than the WWF did.
The WWF had more. Deal with it..
The WWE had more. By a large margin. No one had ever said the WCW was pulling in ratings of 0. Of fucking course it had viewers. But it was losing, and badly. That was the point of the Monday Night Wars. It was a ratings war. And the WCW lost it, and their money, and their flagship show.
If you seriously think that the only reason the WCW is gone is because TW/Turner simply didn't want them on TV anymore, then you're deluded.
You clearly have anger issues, stemming from the immense amount of butthurt you received from the early 2000s trolling you took up your ass when WCW went under. You shouldn't take that out on me.
1. Does WCW exist any longer? Answer: No.
2. Why? Because they failed. If they had succeeded there's a VERY good chance they would still exist apart from WWE.
As for my knowledge of wrestling history, I've been watching for some 30 years now and I've seen the same thing in the wrestling industry that I've seen in the retail industry. The big dogs win the little dogs lose. At the end of the day the reason is that the big dogs produce a better overall product and get that product in more peoples' hands than the little dogs. (i.e. Big box retail pushing out the Mom and Pop stores.) When a company doesn't have the ability to grow with the competition, they fail to exist. Now, you can say they bowed out gracefully all you like, but the bottom line is WWE drove WCW out of business. Like it or not, those are the facts.
No you're right on that. I won't argue, there.
Bottom line is that for 70 plus years that area of the country had a wrestling market, and that's a very good success rate, granted it went through several different owners and had chaos run amok in the organization, but it still lasted. It might have failed in its battle with the MNW with WWF, but as a company it had some success. There's no denying that. I mean if that's what you think then did the territory system that preceded big name companies like WWF, WCW and the AWA fail then?
Actually you were being the dick first, plain and simple. It's assholes like you that really piss me off because you can't handle being called out on the ludicrous bullshit you say.
And you have the nerve of calling me a dick when you're the one saying all the smark stuff...you stupid asshole.
Who the hell are you to talk about that, it's not like you aren't throwing the insults either, I can man up and admit to my condescending asshole nature, but don't cry "victim" here and not think you aren't doing the same thing. Jerkass.
Calling me "kid" in order to belittle my opinion. Yeah, you're deluded AND a dick.
HE SAID SMARK STUFF! ATTACK! ATTAAAAACK!
I called you a condescending douche when you called me "kid" in order to belittle my opinions, and I've since realized it's not worth having a serious discussion with you. I feel like I'm back arguing about the Monday Night Wars on a BBS in 1999. You are repeating yourself, spewing off deluded versions of history, blaming falling ratings and buyrates on Turner for some reason, and being a massive douche bag on top of it.
You are hard-headed, aggressive, and I'm not going to waste anymore intelligence on some moron who needs to use his age in order to invalidate others' opinions.
You can respond to me all you want, but I am done with this thread until you can settle down from your little temper tantrum and decide to have a mature, adult discussion about grown men who pretend to fight in their underwear.
I gotta call it like I see it, you see at least with Brian In Austin, he challenged my opinions and came at me with substance, you don't have a single bit of substance in anything and everything you've said. You're the one who's going to be bold enough to call me immature and think I believe everything that Eric Bischoff ever said, screw off if you think that.
Like I said I was reading what happened in the news outside of the wrestling world when the WCW sale was going down, you obviously didn't. But please don't bring maturity into this, you brought this on yourself, by reusing the tired old rumor mill of "Hulk and his buddies" when there was more to WCW ending than just that warrants that you deserve no merit on this issue.
yeah, it's not much of an issue for tna, but I am suprised nobodies mentioned that Mickie James did porn back in the day. Not knocking anyone for doing what they gotta do to make money and quite frankly am glad Mickie did one. She's hot
Post of the day! I'll be looking this up, later!
Ahhh, but the difference is that MJ did that YEARS ago and has distanced herself from those days. She has since kept herself far from things like that, started her own music career, such as it is, and has become a very successful wrestler now with 2 organizations. By all appearances, she is not that same person anymore, whereas folks like Laurer seem intent on staying that way and not changing for the better.