TheOneBigWill
[This Space for Rent]
A couple weeks ago a story broke about an undetermined "creature" showing up on the shores of New York, around Southhold in the bay area. This, to my knowledge (and google) is the most recent photo of the newly discovered "creature".
This is a picture of a similar, if not identical creature found almost a year, plus, ago (again, according to google) and the body was taken by authorities and later determined to be that of a "raccoon".
So, because the Authorities are that of morons who try and claim outlandish stupidity and actually believe we'll take this as truth.. I'm asking what everyone here would come to believe this to be? I've come to the conclusion of 3 alternative conclusions. Obviously two are a bit outlandish, themselves, but the final conclusion is what I truly believe it will come to be.
1. Aliens: I know, I know.. but naturally before you completely dismiss it, at least give it about a 5-10 second remote thought. You'd have to be pretty stupid and naive to actually think we're the ONLY living beings, on this planet alone. Thus, it is technically possible and not quite completely out of the realm of reality that this "creature" could be some type of species from an alternative planet.
Yes, I know how incredibly stupid it sounds. But all you have to do, is repeat this exact sentence to yourself..
"We're Human Beings, on a Planet that can sustain life-form, and breathable air. Naturally no other Planet could be similar in any way, shape or form. We're superior and alone in this world."
Now, if you believed yourself in repeating that sentence, congratulations.. you're a fucking moron. We live in a Galaxy, that even Scientists have yet to figure out how big it is. So naturally, we don't know what is out there, nor if we're alone.
2. Military Creation/Diseased Escapee: If you thought the idea of "Aliens" was naive, sci-fi minded and stupid.. then you'll love this conspiracy theory. This, mind you, is the last of the 3 conclusions I've come to that I actually think could be remote. Yet, ironically the closest to what could be true.
While I could easily say "You've all seen the movies" (The Mist, is what I'm referring to) I'll go with a more natural approach. Naturally growing technology. Our Government is constantly thinking up new ideas, and new ways to save our soldiers, yet win the wars we must endure. So why not "create" some weird lab experiments and attempt to create a new race of expendable "animals". (which is what the Government pretty much believes our Soldiers are now, anyways)
Now as I said, I firmly think this is far-fetched even more than Aliens. Mainly because we can't prove or disprove Aliens to be real or fake, but with the Military you're walking a pretty fine line trying to claim they'd actually do something like this, behind the public's eye.. right? I mean, with all the weapons and abilities with computers.. why back-track to animal type creatures? Seems kinda.. well, movie-scripted, ya know. But it's a theory.
And an even more interesting one when you factor in Plum Island's "Animal Disease Center" which isn't that far from the place this creature was found.
And finally, the theory I firmly believe is the truth.. to put it all to rest..
3. Pollution: The part of the story that I recently read that caught my eye more than the disfigured creature, the unique name, or the theory of aliens.. was more importantly where this "thing" was discovered, and the description of the surrounding area and bay.
So, here you have a case of discovering a disfigured (dead) apparent animal, and it smells horribly (naturally, it's dead) but it's also been discovered apparently washed up on shore from water that carries tons of garbage, trash and other foul things.
Raccoon? No.. Turtle? I think maybe. I truly do. Look closer at the pictures, and the face looks similar to that of a snapping turtle. It also looks like it could've lost it's shell. Now, I'm unsure if Turtles can do that, but I'd imagine they could.. and naturally, if this "turtle/creature" was floating/swimming around in diseased polluted, trashed filled waters.. then naturally it's going to contract something and likely die from it.
My only problem with the turtle theory, is it has a tail, and what looks like longer legs than a turtle would have. It almost looks Dog-like, yet the face is so deformed and disfigured that I wouldn't guess that, either. However, once again a Dog wouldn't likely survive in that type of water either.. and with the pollution mixed, it's fur could've been basically washed off and disfigured in the process.
Case solved, problem over? You be the judge. What's your theories on this discovery.. and why did the Authorities and Military cover up the discoveries of this same, identical creature a little over a year ago and attempt to make us believe it was that of a "raccoon"?
This is a picture of a similar, if not identical creature found almost a year, plus, ago (again, according to google) and the body was taken by authorities and later determined to be that of a "raccoon".
So, because the Authorities are that of morons who try and claim outlandish stupidity and actually believe we'll take this as truth.. I'm asking what everyone here would come to believe this to be? I've come to the conclusion of 3 alternative conclusions. Obviously two are a bit outlandish, themselves, but the final conclusion is what I truly believe it will come to be.
1. Aliens: I know, I know.. but naturally before you completely dismiss it, at least give it about a 5-10 second remote thought. You'd have to be pretty stupid and naive to actually think we're the ONLY living beings, on this planet alone. Thus, it is technically possible and not quite completely out of the realm of reality that this "creature" could be some type of species from an alternative planet.
Yes, I know how incredibly stupid it sounds. But all you have to do, is repeat this exact sentence to yourself..
"We're Human Beings, on a Planet that can sustain life-form, and breathable air. Naturally no other Planet could be similar in any way, shape or form. We're superior and alone in this world."
Now, if you believed yourself in repeating that sentence, congratulations.. you're a fucking moron. We live in a Galaxy, that even Scientists have yet to figure out how big it is. So naturally, we don't know what is out there, nor if we're alone.
2. Military Creation/Diseased Escapee: If you thought the idea of "Aliens" was naive, sci-fi minded and stupid.. then you'll love this conspiracy theory. This, mind you, is the last of the 3 conclusions I've come to that I actually think could be remote. Yet, ironically the closest to what could be true.
While I could easily say "You've all seen the movies" (The Mist, is what I'm referring to) I'll go with a more natural approach. Naturally growing technology. Our Government is constantly thinking up new ideas, and new ways to save our soldiers, yet win the wars we must endure. So why not "create" some weird lab experiments and attempt to create a new race of expendable "animals". (which is what the Government pretty much believes our Soldiers are now, anyways)
Now as I said, I firmly think this is far-fetched even more than Aliens. Mainly because we can't prove or disprove Aliens to be real or fake, but with the Military you're walking a pretty fine line trying to claim they'd actually do something like this, behind the public's eye.. right? I mean, with all the weapons and abilities with computers.. why back-track to animal type creatures? Seems kinda.. well, movie-scripted, ya know. But it's a theory.
And an even more interesting one when you factor in Plum Island's "Animal Disease Center" which isn't that far from the place this creature was found.
And finally, the theory I firmly believe is the truth.. to put it all to rest..
3. Pollution: The part of the story that I recently read that caught my eye more than the disfigured creature, the unique name, or the theory of aliens.. was more importantly where this "thing" was discovered, and the description of the surrounding area and bay.
So, here you have a case of discovering a disfigured (dead) apparent animal, and it smells horribly (naturally, it's dead) but it's also been discovered apparently washed up on shore from water that carries tons of garbage, trash and other foul things.
Raccoon? No.. Turtle? I think maybe. I truly do. Look closer at the pictures, and the face looks similar to that of a snapping turtle. It also looks like it could've lost it's shell. Now, I'm unsure if Turtles can do that, but I'd imagine they could.. and naturally, if this "turtle/creature" was floating/swimming around in diseased polluted, trashed filled waters.. then naturally it's going to contract something and likely die from it.
My only problem with the turtle theory, is it has a tail, and what looks like longer legs than a turtle would have. It almost looks Dog-like, yet the face is so deformed and disfigured that I wouldn't guess that, either. However, once again a Dog wouldn't likely survive in that type of water either.. and with the pollution mixed, it's fur could've been basically washed off and disfigured in the process.
Case solved, problem over? You be the judge. What's your theories on this discovery.. and why did the Authorities and Military cover up the discoveries of this same, identical creature a little over a year ago and attempt to make us believe it was that of a "raccoon"?
. My Gosh that creature is horrible. My guess is basically that it's an undiscovered creature. Much, as you say, we'd be stupid to 100% believe humans are the only lifeform in the Universe, we'd also be stupid to believe scientists have discovered and named every creature, especially seeings as they find new ones all the time. 
