Miss Universe Canada Disqualifies Transsexual Contestant

Xemmy

of the Le'beau family
First off, I'd like to say- DAMN it's good to be in the Cigar Lounge again. I don't care what you changed the name to. It's still the Cigar Lounge. Anyways, I saw this story on Yahoo!, here's the link: http://shine.yahoo.com/beauty/miss-...ranssexual-contestant-she-born-192000420.html

Miss Universe Canada officials have banned 23-year-old transsexual Jenna Talackova from participating in the pageant finals to be held in Toronto in May, 2012. The Vancouver contestant was one of sixty-five women chosen to compete in the national contest (which is owned by Donald Trump). The Daily Mail Reports that Denis Davila, national director of Miss Universe Canada, asserts that every contestant must be a "naturally born female." Critics of the decision claim that the rules do not specifically address sex change or plastic surgery.

So essentially you've got a transgender woman banned from a beauty contest, where it APPEARS that there isn't an actual rule that bans her from competing. Rule or not, there's no real justification for this ban, and in my opinion an obvious act of discrimination. It's not like a transgender has an unfair advantage in a beauty contest, and I doubt they're banning women with fake breasts either. But it does bring up an interesting thought- Does Miss Universe Canada have the right to discriminate? In the end they're a business, and some would argue that they should be able to discriminate against anyone they damn well please. Is this transgender phobia? Should this discrimination be allowed? What are your thoughts?
 
When it all boils down to genetics, what makes a woman a woman? Two X chromosomes. What makes a man a man? Having one X and one Y chromosome.

Miss Universe Canada does not need to have a specific rule regarding this, because the contestant in question, regardless of what body parts were surgically altered/removed/added, still has one X chromosome and one Y chromosome, and is still biologically/genetically a male, therefore ineligible to compete. End of story.
 
When it all boils down to genetics, what makes a woman a woman? Two X chromosomes. What makes a man a man? Having one X and one Y chromosome.

Miss Universe Canada does not need to have a specific rule regarding this, because the contestant in question, regardless of what body parts were surgically altered/removed/added, still has one X chromosome and one Y chromosome, and is still biologically/genetically a male, therefore ineligible to compete. End of story.

I doubt beauty contests give a damn about genetics. More importantly, it isn't so simple. Gender is a range of characteristics that distinguish males and females. An X and Y chromosome work for biology, but in social circumstance, that definition doesn't mean anything. Your argument also implies that you would have no problem with transgender men competing in the Miss Universe pageant.

Btw, glad to see you still like to argue. :p
 
If by transgender man, you mean a woman with two X chromosomes who surgically altered her body to resemble a man's, no, I wouldn't have a problem with that for the same reason I don't have a problem with them barring an individual who was surgically altered to look female but genetically a man.

Gender is not the same as sex. Miss Universe pageant contestants are women by actual sex, not by gender/self identification as such.

What transgenders choose to call themselves is not my concern. Biologically speaking, they are what they are, regardless of any surgeries to alter their bodies. Those surgeries are superficial only, and do not alter their genetic code. If Jenna Talackova were to be cloned, the clone would have a penis, not a vagina.
 
Except Miss Universe isn't about genetic sex Davi. It's about a bunch of ladies trying to look better than one another. It has nothing do with sex. And if you've seen this woman (and I do mean woman), you wouldn't have a clue that she was born male. And considering this entire contest is based on looks, I really don't see why genetic birth somehow take precedence over gender identity. If you really want to use genetic science to define a beauty pageant then I suppose that's your right. Doesn't keep this from being the definition of anally retentive though. Nor does it hide the obvious transgender phobia.
 
I realy, really want a Chevy Corvette. I wanted a Corvette ever since I turned 16, 21 years ago. I drive a Pontiac Sunbird. If I take the Sunbird's body panels off and find some way to jury rig Corvette body panels on it so that it LOOKS like a Corvette, and I call it a Corvette, is it a Corvette? If I want to then sell it, can I sell it as a Corvette for the price a Corvette would fetch without ripping anyone off? Would that be honest of me to do? Of course not, because we both know that underneath the hood, it's not a Corvette at all. No matter how I dress it up, it still has a Sunbird's frame, Sunbird's engine, Sunbird's interior...because it's still a Sunbird, not a Corvette.

I hope you can understand how this relates to a transgender "woman" trying to compete in a woman's only beauty pageant.
 
I realy, really want a Chevy Corvette. I wanted a Corvette ever since I turned 16, 21 years ago. I drive a Pontiac Sunbird. If I take the Sunbird's body panels off and find some way to jury rig Corvette body panels on it so that it LOOKS like a Corvette, and I call it a Corvette, is it a Corvette? If I want to then sell it, can I sell it as a Corvette for the price a Corvette would fetch without ripping anyone off? Would that be honest of me to do? Of course not, because we both know that underneath the hood, it's not a Corvette at all. No matter how I dress it up, it still has a Sunbird's frame, Sunbird's engine, Sunbird's interior...because it's still a Sunbird, not a Corvette.

I hope you can understand how this relates to a transgender "woman" trying to compete in a woman's only beauty pageant.

Don't compare someone who's had a sex change, to a car trying to be passed off as a different model. Human beings aren't cars. And transgender people aren't being dishonest. They're being who they want to be. And unless you want to tell me that you think it's dishonest for anyone to have appearance altering surgery, including a majority of the women in those contests with fake breasts, nose jobs, etc. then your argument is invalid. And I'm sure you'll move on to tell me that women in those contests should be completely natural without surgery. But we can go further than that. Even those women, are going to have their hair done with hair spray, caked with make-up, wearing color contact lenses, and wearing pretty dresses to enhance their appearance. A beauty pageant is superficial. It has nothing to do with what's under the hood.

Point blank, being a women isn't about a damn chromosome. Women don't define their womanhood with their DNA. It's an excuse. Nothing more. Nothing less.
 
Its fine if they are who they want to be, but that doesn't truly make them a woman for the sake of a women's only beauty pageant. I don't a fuck if they are an accountant, restaurant manager or something like that, their sex and gender are totally irrelevant to the job position. More power to them...but for certain sex specific things, like a pageant or athletic competition where it is specifically sex separated, it's not good enough. We have the Sumer Olympic games coming up...would it be fair if the Chinese "women" competing were all born men but had sex change operations? Would the fact that they would be larger, stronger, faster than their competition because of their naturally occuring higher testosterone levels still be fair competition to you? Or would the fact that they are genetically men give them an unfair competitive edge in many sports? Using your logic, there would be absolutely nothing wrong with the Chinese (just using them as an example) attempting to rig the Olympics by fielding a team of surgically altered men and passing them of as women.

Beauty Pageants such as the Miss Universe contest, Miss America, etc are intended for naturally born women only, just like women's athletic events would be, in order to ensure a fair competition. Jenna looks like a woman due to artificial methods only. Jenna is still a man though, and will always be, regardless of any labels assigned. What would happen if Jenna couldn't take estrogen pills/injections anymore, and allowed "her" body to assume it's natural chemical balance? "Her" voice would drop, and unless "she" had electrolysis all over to prevent the growth of body hair, "she" will have to shave, and deal with chest hair again, as "her" testosterone levels would revert back to normal. "She" is not a woman. "She is a he who superficially resembles one due to massive body altering surgery. I can have a guy implant a horn on my forehead, doesn't mean I am a unicorn.
 
Its fine if they are who they want to be, but that doesn't truly make them a woman for the sake of a women's only beauty pageant. I don't a fuck if they are an accountant, restaurant manager or something like that, their sex and gender are totally irrelevant to the job position. More power to them...but for certain sex specific things, like a pageant or athletic competition where it is specifically sex separated, it's not good enough. We have the Sumer Olympic games coming up...would it be fair if the Chinese "women" competing were all born men but had sex change operations? Would the fact that they would be larger, stronger, faster than their competition because of their naturally occuring higher testosterone levels still be fair competition to you? Or would the fact that they are genetically men give them an unfair competitive edge in many sports? Using your logic, there would be absolutely nothing wrong with the Chinese (just using them as an example) attempting to rig the Olympics by fielding a team of surgically altered men and passing them of as women.

Beauty Pageants such as the Miss Universe contest, Miss America, etc are intended for naturally born women only, just like women's athletic events would be, in order to ensure a fair competition. Jenna looks like a woman due to artificial methods only. Jenna is still a man though, and will always be, regardless of any labels assigned. What would happen if Jenna couldn't take estrogen pills/injections anymore, and allowed "her" body to assume it's natural chemical balance? "Her" voice would drop, and unless "she" had electrolysis all over to prevent the growth of body hair, "she" will have to shave, and deal with chest hair again, as "her" testosterone levels would revert back to normal. "She" is not a woman. "She is a he who superficially resembles one due to massive body altering surgery. I can have a guy implant a horn on my forehead, doesn't mean I am a unicorn.

Not true. In sex reassignment surgery they remove the testes, therefore the primary endocrine gland for producing testosterone is removed. A small amount is still made by the adrenal glands (in males and females), but a trans-woman would wouldn't have ovaries, and thus she would actually be getting less testosterone than a female born woman.

For all extensive purposes, this person is a woman but she isn't a female. The question is what's important to you, that your contestants are women, or that your contestants are female? I think most people would agree that these pagents are about beautiful women, so I see less of an issue with female women and male-born women than I do with female women and female-born women who had sex-reassignment and now have beards, a penis, etc.

The third option of course would be to disqualify all transgender people altogether.

I think they should allow her to compete, she doesn't hold any advantage over the other contestants, as it's not like surgeries or breast augmentations are disallowed. She's not a born female, but why should that matter? She looks like a woman, she acts like a woman, she culturally acts like a woman - that's what these pagents are judging.
 
I think Davi handled this about as well as it could be and explained it as well as it could be but there is something else here I want to address in the responses given by Xemmy Le'Beau


I doubt beauty contests give a damn about genetics. More importantly, it isn't so simple. Gender is a range of characteristics that distinguish males and females. An X and Y chromosome work for biology, but in social circumstance, that definition doesn't mean anything. Your argument also implies that you would have no problem with transgender men competing in the Miss Universe pageant.

Btw, glad to see you still like to argue. :p

Except Miss Universe isn't about genetic sex Davi. It's about a bunch of ladies trying to look better than one another. It has nothing do with sex. And if you've seen this woman (and I do mean woman), you wouldn't have a clue that she was born male. And considering this entire contest is based on looks, I really don't see why genetic birth somehow take precedence over gender identity. If you really want to use genetic science to define a beauty pageant then I suppose that's your right. Doesn't keep this from being the definition of anally retentive though. Nor does it hide the obvious transgender phobia.

Don't compare someone who's had a sex change, to a car trying to be passed off as a different model. Human beings aren't cars. And transgender people aren't being dishonest. They're being who they want to be. And unless you want to tell me that you think it's dishonest for anyone to have appearance altering surgery, including a majority of the women in those contests with fake breasts, nose jobs, etc. then your argument is invalid. And I'm sure you'll move on to tell me that women in those contests should be completely natural without surgery. But we can go further than that. Even those women, are going to have their hair done with hair spray, caked with make-up, wearing color contact lenses, and wearing pretty dresses to enhance their appearance. A beauty pageant is superficial. It has nothing to do with what's under the hood.

Point blank, being a women isn't about a damn chromosome. Women don't define their womanhood with their DNA. It's an excuse. Nothing more. Nothing less.

I just have a problem with the angle you seen to want to take here. You seem preoccupied with making this about "Phobia's, Injustices, and Discrimination" and painting transgenders as victims just as people of your ilk often do when it comes to LGBT affairs, when it comes down to simple RULES whether they exist in law, nature, or a beauty pageant. What don't you understand about the distinction between man and woman? I think Davi (who displayed the patience of a saint with you) laid it out rather well. Instead of comprehending that and saying "Oh, well, that makes sense I guess" you want to insult the integrity of the people running the contest because you don't agree with the rules.

You imply that they don't care about genetics, it's just a thing against tranny's, that they are displaying a blatant phobia of tranny's(an incessantly repeated, cliche'd, and low brow response to people the pro-LGBT crowd disagree with), and try to chalk up all the legitimate reasons this person does not meet qualifications as "Nothing But An Excuse" while you make the excuse yourself that "Beauty Pageants are Superficial, and it has nothing to do with what is under the hood".

If that is the case than what is to stop every Drag Queen from entering these contests? After all, they identify themselves in character as women, they look like women, so what is wrong with that? You are saying that the actual sex of the contestant doesn't matter so what should be wrong with men in drag entering beauty pageants? The truth is the competitions are for women only and being a woman isn't identified by appearance alone. You can cut, nip, tuck, implant all you want, take as many hormones as you want, cake on as much make-up to change your appearance as you want, but no matter what you identify yourself as, if you were born a man, you are a man, period. Nothing can change that, and nothing will.

Davi made an excellent point regarding the Olympics. If sex is irrelevant, than what is to stop me from getting a sex change operation and entering women's volleyball events and dominating them? Or maybe I'll join a womens softball team and become the greatest home run hitter the league has ever seen since as a man I am bigger and stronger? That wouldn't be fair would it? Neither is a surgically altered man posing as a woman competing against ACTUAL women. Even though it's not physical competition, it's still dishonest of the contestant at the least. There are significant biological, mental, emotional, and physical differences between men and women, just because you chop your twig and berries off, grow some boobs, and put on some make-up, that doesn't make you any more woman than a drag queen, or any less man than a lumberjack.
 
I just have a problem with the angle you seen to want to take here. You seem preoccupied with making this about "Phobia's, Injustices, and Discrimination" and painting transgenders as victims just as people of your ilk often do when it comes to LGBT affairs, when it comes down to simple RULES whether they exist in law, nature, or a beauty pageant. What don't you understand about the distinction between man and woman? I think Davi (who displayed the patience of a saint with you) laid it out rather well. Instead of comprehending that and saying "Oh, well, that makes sense I guess" you want to insult the integrity of the people running the contest because you don't agree with the rules.

You imply that they don't care about genetics, it's just a thing against tranny's, that they are displaying a blatant phobia of tranny's(an incessantly repeated, cliche'd, and low brow response to people the pro-LGBT crowd disagree with), and try to chalk up all the legitimate reasons this person does not meet qualifications as "Nothing But An Excuse" while you make the excuse yourself that "Beauty Pageants are Superficial, and it has nothing to do with what is under the hood".

If that is the case than what is to stop every Drag Queen from entering these contests? After all, they identify themselves in character as women, they look like women, so what is wrong with that? You are saying that the actual sex of the contestant doesn't matter so what should be wrong with men in drag entering beauty pageants? The truth is the competitions are for women only and being a woman isn't identified by appearance alone. You can cut, nip, tuck, implant all you want, take as many hormones as you want, cake on as much make-up to change your appearance as you want, but no matter what you identify yourself as, if you were born a man, you are a man, period. Nothing can change that, and nothing will.

Davi made an excellent point regarding the Olympics. If sex is irrelevant, than what is to stop me from getting a sex change operation and entering women's volleyball events and dominating them? Or maybe I'll join a womens softball team and become the greatest home run hitter the league has ever seen since as a man I am bigger and stronger? That wouldn't be fair would it? Neither is a surgically altered man posing as a woman competing against ACTUAL women. Even though it's not physical competition, it's still dishonest of the contestant at the least. There are significant biological, mental, emotional, and physical differences between men and women, just because you chop your twig and berries off, grow some boobs, and put on some make-up, that doesn't make you any more woman than a drag queen, or any less man than a lumberjack.

What seems more out of place, Ba Bomb, option 1 or option 2:
  • 1. Beauty Pagent - Gorgeous women with a few bearded men, but they're all genetically female.
  • 2. Beauty Pagent - Gorgeous women where they all look/act the same, but a few are actually genetically male.

Drag queens and transvestites aren't the same as trans-women, they have penises, they produce a male level of testosterone, etc - they are male men who wear women clothing - that's not the same as trans-women. There are far fewer differences between a trans-woman and a real female relative to a drag queen/transvestite and a real female.

Honestly, I could care less, if a man wanted to enter a beauty pagent for women and could pull it off, go for it. I think you would have a hard time (no pun intended) when it comes to the swimsuit portion and you're penis and lack of female breasts are evident, but go right ahead.

This argument about the Olympics has nothing to do with this. You're describing a scenario in which a trans-woman could possibly have a distinct advantage over a real female - how is that the case in a beauty pagent? Regardless of your sex, every contestant cakes on plenty of makeup, spends hours on their hair and nails, and surgeries such as breast augmentation are allowed.
 
This argument about the Olympics has nothing to do with this. You're describing a scenario in which a trans-woman could possibly have a distinct advantage over a real female - how is that the case in a beauty pagent? Regardless of your sex, every contestant cakes on plenty of makeup, spends hours on their hair and nails, and surgeries such as breast augmentation are allowed.

Actually it has everything to do with this, as it establishes, even in your mind, that there are substantial differences between a natural born woman and a natural born man surgically altered to "become" one. It must, because if you truly believed that Transsexualized "woman" = woman, then you would be objecting entirely to the idea that transsexuals would not be allowed to compete in the Olympics...instead, you acknowledge that there are differences, don't actually dispute the differences, and merely attempt to say that those differences wouldn't apply to a beauty contest.

By even recognizing the differences, you are essentially admitting that a transsexualized "woman" is not actually a woman in the true sense of the word. Otherwise you would be making a case that they are being discriminated against by all of the various sports governing bodies that bar them from competing as women. It's that acknowledgment of the differences that allows a beauty pageant to disqualify a transexualized individual from competing.

And again, as I pointed out to Xemmy, if you cloned Jenna, the clone would have a penis because underneath the surface, underneath the surgeries, Jenna is still biologically a man. That's really all that needs to be said.
 
Actually it has everything to do with this, as it establishes, even in your mind, that there are substantial differences between a natural born woman and a natural born man surgically altered to "become" one. It must, because if you truly believed that Transsexualized "woman" = woman, then you would be objecting entirely to the idea that transsexuals would not be allowed to compete in the Olympics...instead, you acknowledge that there are differences, don't actually dispute the differences, and merely attempt to say that those differences wouldn't apply to a beauty contest.

By even recognizing the differences, you are essentially admitting that a transsexualized "woman" is not actually a woman in the true sense of the word. Otherwise you would be making a case that they are being discriminated against by all of the various sports governing bodies that bar them from competing as women. It's that acknowledgment of the differences that allows a beauty pageant to disqualify a transexualized individual from competing.

And again, as I pointed out to Xemmy, if you cloned Jenna, the clone would have a penis because underneath the surface, underneath the surgeries, Jenna is still biologically a man. That's really all that needs to be said.

Admitting subtle differences isn't the same as saying that they aren't actually women. He gave you an inch, and you're trying to say it's ten feet. Their physical traits are that of women, not men. And as long as we're picking a category, they're definitely women. And once again, there isn't a specific rule that bans her. A beauty pageant isn't a sport. In sport, a women that still has lingering physical effects from formerly being a man MIGHT have an advantage. The longer the hormone therapy goes, the more womanly they are. In a beauty contest, this argument and this difference is non-existence in regards to the competition.

Jenna is a woman. Any biologist would note the lack of male sex organs. It wouldn't be until they got the DNA sample back that they'd fine that she was male. She's a woman in nearly everything else that matters. It's just a matter of what's more important. Male and Female or Man and Women. And as beauty pageants aren't molecular biology I'm going to play for the left. As much as I love biology, it isn't fit to judge a social class. That's what psychology and sociology is for.
 
Jenna is a woman. Any biologist would note the lack of male sex organs. It wouldn't be until they got the DNA sample back that they'd fine that she was male. She's a woman in nearly everything else that matters. It's just a matter of what's more important. Male and Female or Man and Women. And as beauty pageants aren't molecular biology I'm going to play for the left. As much as I love biology, it isn't fit to judge a social class. That's what psychology and sociology is for.

You are either a woman, or you are not. There aren't shades of grey. Jenna is a man, and will always be a man, regardless of surgery. You keep using words like "in nearly everything else that matters", "what's more important", etc. But, you are either biologically a male, biologically a female, (or biologically a hermaphrodite, I guess, if you wanted to really get technical). But you are what you are...and what Jenna is, is a man. A man that was born with a penis, a man that has an XY chromosomal configuration. Oh, and in case your biologist missed it, Jenna is either going to have an Adam's apple or a scar somewhere on the neck to indicate it was surgically removed, thinned, or whatever the hell they do with it).
 
As far as I'm concerned, as long as this is a privately run operation, the company can choose what rules to enforce. If they want to make rule saying only naturally born women can compete, that is their right, and they should have the ability to enforce that rule.

With that said, were I a citizen of Canada, I would make sure to let them know how disgusting I find their active discrimination by not watching their program, and by not participating in any way, even to the point of encouraging others to also stay away from this competition. Since they ARE a private company, that is my right. I choose to not condone the morality behind the decision, even though I respect the fact it is their decision to make.

When it all boils down to genetics, what makes a woman a woman? Two X chromosomes. What makes a man a man? Having one X and one Y chromosome.
I disagree, I think there are far more things which make a woman a woman. Their mental and emotional state, their genitalia, their behaviors and characteristics, their hormonal levels, and most importantly, how they honestly identify themselves.

Using "X" and "Y" to determine a woman is as simplistic as saying killing people is bad. It doesn't take into account the variety of reasons which make up the actual person/decision.

What don't you understand about the distinction between man and woman? I think Davi (who displayed the patience of a saint with you) laid it out rather well. Instead of comprehending that and saying "Oh, well, that makes sense I guess" you want to insult the integrity of the people running the contest because you don't agree with the rules.
The rules are discriminatory. I understand that people of your "ilk" have no problem discriminating against people for things they never had a choice in, but for those of us who recognize the concept of all people having the right to choose who they are, and letting their actions determine the person, it's hard to accept discrimination.

If that is the case than what is to stop every Drag Queen from entering these contests?
First of all, drag queens are completely different from this situation, for reasons I believe SalvIsWin mentioned. Second of all, what stops them? The fact they aren't beautiful enough to be there. This woman obviously was.

The truth is the competitions are for women only and being a woman isn't identified by appearance alone.
And that's convenient for you, because if you accept this discrimination, it's easy for you to keep blacks out of restaurants, women out of the workplace, and the white man can rightfully take his place as the ruler of the world, right?

but no matter what you identify yourself as, if you were born a man, you are a man, period. Nothing can change that, and nothing will.
Yes, and if you were born an atheist, you are an atheist, period. Nothing can change that, and nothing will.

Right?
 
"Wrestlezone - come for the wrestling, stay for the gender classification expertise".

I don't care much for this. It isn't exactly Brown vs. The Board of Education. If it were up to me she would be able to compete. From a humanity perspective, it seems like the right thing to do and from a business perspective, it is a huge mistake to piss off the LGBT.
 
What seems more out of place, Ba Bomb, option 1 or option 2:
  • 1. Beauty Pagent - Gorgeous women with a few bearded men, but they're all genetically female.
  • 2. Beauty Pagent - Gorgeous women where they all look/act the same, but a few are actually genetically male.

Drag queens and transvestites aren't the same as trans-women, they have penises, they produce a male level of testosterone, etc - they are male men who wear women clothing - that's not the same as trans-women. There are far fewer differences between a trans-woman and a real female relative to a drag queen/transvestite and a real female.

Yeah, I kind of already knew that. And the example with the pageant 1 or 2 isn't any kind of situation I or anyone else even described. Last time I checked, no drag queen I've ever known had a beard. Most of them are stage performers (at least that I've known) and dress up as women as do song and dance routines and stuff like that. The point was however, that if someone who regardless of all changes they make to their body is a man is allowed to compete in a women's competition simply because they look like a woman, why draw the line there? If simply looking and behaving like a woman is the only relevant criteria, than what is to stop say...a drag queen, who also looks and acts as a woman? That's basically what Xemmy was saying and I pointed out one of the many flaws of that logic.

Honestly, I could care less, if a man wanted to enter a beauty pagent for women and could pull it off, go for it. I think you would have a hard time (no pun intended) when it comes to the swimsuit portion and you're penis and lack of female breasts are evident, but go right ahead.

Thank you for inserting some humor.:)

This argument about the Olympics has nothing to do with this. You're describing a scenario in which a trans-woman could possibly have a distinct advantage over a real female - how is that the case in a beauty pagent? Regardless of your sex, every contestant cakes on plenty of makeup, spends hours on their hair and nails, and surgeries such as breast augmentation are allowed.

I think you missed my point a bit. The point was that in any scenario when the person in question is not of the actual sex that is required for competition, they should not be able to compete. Either way be it a trans-woman, sex changed man to woman, or whatever variation it is, it's dishonest. You are presenting yourself as something you are trying to be, not what you are, which is a man. No matter how much surgery you have, how you try to change your biological functions, or anything else, the fact remains the person IS a man. Emasculating yourself, taking hormones to alter your biological chemistry and grow breasts, having plastic surgery to alter your genitalia further, they are all alterations and deviations of what was in an attempt to create what that person wants to be instead. But like Davi's Corvetter example, you can't change a Sunbird into a Corvette.


Admitting subtle differences isn't the same as saying that they aren't actually women. He gave you an inch, and you're trying to say it's ten feet. Their physical traits are that of women, not men. And as long as we're picking a category, they're definitely women. And once again, there isn't a specific rule that bans her.

You are correct in that there is no "specific" rule, but common sense kind of supersedes in this case. I'm sorry, I don't know how else to break this to you but the fact is, if you are born a man, you are a man until the day you die no matter how much you defile your body and try to make yourself something else. This isn't that whole "if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck" thing. This is far different and it seems that you can't grasp how being a man is permanent regardless of anything you do to try and change that. It's the same as how a black or Asian or Hispanic person can not become a white person, their DNA is always going to be that .001% or whatever it is different that distinguishes them as what they are.

Obviously this hasn't come up before, which is why there wasn't a rule, so I think it's kind of cheap, grasping at straws to use that as leverage to try and say a man posing as a woman should be able to compete against naturally born women, in a women's only competition. Maybe try the Miss/Mr Tranny Canada Pageant.


A beauty pageant isn't a sport. In sport, a women that still has lingering physical effects from formerly being a man MIGHT have an advantage. The longer the hormone therapy goes, the more womanly they are. In a beauty contest, this argument and this difference is non-existence in regards to the competition.

I addressed the sports example above with SalvIsWin so you can read that for your answer there, however let me point something else out here. You mentioned that the longer hormone therapy goes the more womanly they are right? Well look at your own words for the answers. They are not women, so they have to undergo "Hormone Therapy" in an attempt to be more "womanly", and even being "womanly" isn't actually being a woman, it's attempting to be one even though you are not.

No matter how you try to spin it, it all comes down to the fact that without all the hormone therapy, without surgical alteration, what you have is still a man, and even after all that, even though the appearance changes, it's still a man. Even the changes that occur in their bodily functions are a byproduct of measures taken to reach that goal. Naturally they could not be that way because they are men. Now of course if you emasculate yourself, you are never going to generate the same kind of testosterone levels you once did, and with the ingestion of estrogen you will force your body to change in certain ways. However, none of that changes what actually is, just what seems to be.

Jenna is a woman. Any biologist would note the lack of male sex organs. It wouldn't be until they got the DNA sample back that they'd fine that she was male. She's a woman in nearly everything else that matters. It's just a matter of what's more important. Male and Female or Man and Women.

No Xemmy, Jenna is actually Jim, and Jim had an identity crisis and underwent dramatic surgical procedures to change his physical appearance, so that he would appear as a woman. Jim might have even taken drugs to, as you said, be more "womanly" but under it all, Jim is a man.

You note the absence of male sex organs as if that makes Jim any more Jenna, but it doesn't. Jim had an identity crisis and lopped off his genitalia, emasculating himself in an attempt to become a woman which is genetically impossible. You can't change your genetics, and genetically Jim is a man. After a procedure of that magnitude your biologist would only be pointing out the obvious. What he also might point out that is not quite as obvious was that there's a hole where there used to be a pole, and that Jenna is actually Jim.

You say he is nearly a woman in every other way that by your definition matters. Correct, NEARLY a woman, but not. Only appears to be.

And as beauty pageants aren't molecular biology I'm going to play for the left. As much as I love biology, it isn't fit to judge a social class. That's what psychology and sociology is for.

Of course, you are going to ignore all fact and reasonable logic to propagate an ideal that this is about social class because that's as far as your eye can see, that's why you still think Jim is Jenna. Even though it's all you have to cling on to and try to justify your stance, this has nothing to do with social class, discrimination, homophobia, or any other slanderous tag you can affix to it in your own imagination. It comes down to what we are and what we aren't. A man is a man, a woman is a woman. No matter what you do to try and change that, you can't. You can only alter what already was, but that doesn't change what is. Men and women by their own design have physical features that can not be altered outside of genitalia. A man has different bone structure than a woman, a mans hands are different, his cheek bones and jaw line are different, his feet are different, his legs and arms are different, their hair grows differently, the way their brain works is different even. You can tinker with them all you want, but without dramatic alterations those differences are highly prevalent. All that going through all the procedures does is make them less prevalent, but as I'm sure you're tired of hearing, they are still a man.
 
I think you're all ignoring the most important question about this situation: Would you fuck her?

The question is aimed at the straight men on here of course, but it's a legitimate question.

I for one would be disgusted if I found out my girlfriend was transgender and I did not know about it. Firstly, it's because she hid something way too important and I would not be able to trust her ever again. Secondly, it's because she IS A MAN. As a straight guy, I have no intentions of knowingly entering a sexual relationship with a man wether he appears to have a vagina or not.

Both of those reasons affect the competition. Firstly, this girl joined the beauty pageant and hid her transgender operation from everyone. It would be impossible to trust her. Secondly, she IS A MAN. The judges would not want to fuck her. A lot of judges mostly base their decisions on who arouses them more, and at least the straight ones will never be able to view her the same way they view the other contestants. Had she competed, she would be gone in the first round for sure.

I would not want to fuck her. And it's not "transgender-phobia", just as its not homophobia to not want to be with another man.

You all might disagree with me. So tell me, would you fuck her?
 
And, I want to point out, neither Ba-Bomb or myself are suggesting that Jenna/Jim is less of a human being, just that Jenna/Jim is not eligible to be Miss Universe Canada. If Jenna/Jim wants to be an accountant, fashion designer, Senator, restaurant manager, CEO of a company, or whatever else, great. No problems. Do whatever. Jenna/Jim's self identity is only a problem for those things are specifically geared only towards men or women specifically.

I am only 5'10. I will never be able to dunk a basketball on a regulation height rim. Okay. It's something I can't do. I move on with my life. I recognize that because of the physical characteristics I was born with, there are things I can't do, and can never do. Whatever. Jenna/Jim can't be Miss Universe Canada because Jenna/Jim was born with a penis. Okay, move along. Not the end of the world.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is an American citizen, can do everything other American citizens can do...well, except for that one, teeny tiny thing...he can't be President because he wasn't born a citizen, he didn't become an American citizen until into his adulthood. He can be governor of California, he can be a bodybuilder, he can be an action star, he can be a business man, he can be a whole ton of other things, but he can't be President, because of his birth status. But you know what? He isn't being discriminated against either. You are what you are, and he was born in Austria, and the Constitution bars him from being President, American citizen or not. Jenna/Jim can't be Miss Universe Canada because Jenna/Jim is genetically a male. Shit happens.

I also want to point out something that Kaztrator just posted...not regarding the "would you fuck her" part, but something more fundamental. If Jenna/Jim hid the fact that he/she was transgendered, wouldn't that imply that he/she knew full well if discovered, he/she would be ineligible, and was trying to circumvent the rules? Wouldn't pageants have a lengthy list of disclosure items that get covered in order to be a contestant, in order to avoid scandal, such as have they ever posed nude, done porn, been arrested, etc? Not that they would be disqualified if they had, but that the pageant expects contestants to be honest about any skeletons in their closet? IE, if you have anything scandalous in your past, they want to know about it to avoid being caught by surprise...If Jenna/Jim deliberately deceived pageant officials to disguise the fact that he/she was transgendered, wouldn't that disqualify her anyway? Not being transgendered in and of itself, but because of the deceit involved in trying to hide it?

American Idol contestants have gotten kicked off the show not because they had previous record deals or arrests, but because they lied to the producers about them. It seems reasonable to me to expect pageant officials to have similar disclosure rules.
 
I also want to point out something that Kaztrator just posted...not regarding the "would you fuck her" part, but something more fundamental. If Jenna/Jim hid the fact that he/she was transgendered, wouldn't that imply that he/she knew full well if discovered, he/she would be ineligible, and was trying to circumvent the rules? Wouldn't pageants have a lengthy list of disclosure items that get covered in order to be a contestant, in order to avoid scandal, such as have they ever posed nude, done porn, been arrested, etc? Not that they would be disqualified if they had, but that the pageant expects contestants to be honest about any skeletons in their closet? IE, if you have anything scandalous in your past, they want to know about it to avoid being caught by surprise...If Jenna/Jim deliberately deceived pageant officials to disguise the fact that he/she was transgendered, wouldn't that disqualify her anyway? Not being transgendered in and of itself, but because of the deceit involved in trying to hide it?

It's definitely a myriad of reasons why she was fired. (1) She did not meet the requirements, (2) She lied to and deceived the pageant officials, (3) They do not consider her a woman.

I think it's pretty simple. And it's not transgender-phobia so I don't understand why people immediately start crying discrimination.

If I was at a bar and a gay man hit on me, and I turned him down, it's not discrimination nor homophobia. I'm not turning him dow because HE is gay. I'm turning him down because I am not gay.

The pageant officials turned her down not just because she is transgender or because she was born a man, but because the contest isn't for men or tansgenders.

Not complicated stuff here.
 
You again? This will be fun. Couldn't resist could you?

As far as I'm concerned, as long as this is a privately run operation, the company can choose what rules to enforce. If they want to make rule saying only naturally born women can compete, that is their right, and they should have the ability to enforce that rule.

This is the only point in which we will be in agreement as I've already read the rest of this and we are really really in for some more fun here.

With that said, were I a citizen of Canada, I would make sure to let them know how disgusting I find their active discrimination by not watching their program, and by not participating in any way, even to the point of encouraging others to also stay away from this competition. Since they ARE a private company, that is my right. I choose to not condone the morality behind the decision, even though I respect the fact it is their decision to make.

The morality behind the decision? As if it were immoral of them to deny this person who is most definitely is a man, who has underwent surgical procedures to APPEAR as a woman, and therefore doesn't meet the criteria to be in an all women's beauty pageant to compete? And it's also supposedly discrimination? Man you never cease to amaze me with your far left bullshit. No matter how badly you want to make it an issue of discrimination, and throw your hand up like it's some injustice against someone, it simply isn't. I know that's hard for you to comprehend, and that's your right to be that stupid, but you remain stupid nonetheless.

(sorry, you always resort to simply calling people stupid for not seeing things in your distorted vision, so I thought you were due to taste your own medicine)


I disagree, I think there are far more things which make a woman a woman. Their mental and emotional state, their genitalia, their behaviors and characteristics, their hormonal levels, and most importantly, how they honestly identify themselves.

I'm glad you think that, and in some ways you are right. The thing is most of that such as mental and emotional state, characteristics and behaviors, hormonal levels, self identity, they are all prevalent from birth, they are unique to that gender, and as I've said already, no amount of alteration changes what already naturally is. Sure, you can take hormones, you can have surgeries, but that doesn't change the actual mental or emotional characteristics and behaviors.

Even though you can take drugs to manipulate hormone levels, without that manipulation and without surgical procedures, there is no question that what you have is a man through and through. Just because someone may act a certain way, or say "I think of myself this way" doesn't mean they are that. I could walk around and say "I identify myself as Batman" but I sure as fuck am not no matter how incessantly I say and profess to believe I am. I can dawn the mask and cape, start going after criminals in acts of vigilante justice, drive a wicked tricked out car, and It doesn't matter, I will not be Batman, I'll be a crazy fuck TRYING to be Batman.

Using "X" and "Y" to determine a woman is as simplistic as saying killing people is bad. It doesn't take into account the variety of reasons which make up the actual person/decision.

Sometimes the answer is just that simple, and in this case it was. I also want to focus on what you said here about "A variety of reasons which make up the actual person" and most of all the KEY WORD "DECISION". You're talking about personal development, which is separate from biological development. "Jenna" naturally developed into a man, and through unnatural processes went through the motions to be as close to being a woman as possible. Unfortunately close only counts in horse-shoes and hand grenades. You can look like a woman, talk like a woman, dress like a woman, and even mimic what you perceive to be the feminine traits that identify the characteristics of a female, but the truth will always be that you are in fact a male with identity issues, striving to be something you are not.

The rules are discriminatory. I understand that people of your "ilk" have no problem discriminating against people for things they never had a choice in, but for those of us who recognize the concept of all people having the right to choose who they are, and letting their actions determine the person, it's hard to accept discrimination.

Ya see, it's stuff like this that makes you so intolerable. Regardless of whether or not you THINK the rules are discriminatory, they are not, and you can't illustrate how they are because of that fact. You can try to spin a technicality by saying that the requirements themselves "discriminate" regarding who can and can not compete, but there is a difference between "parameters of qualification" and "discrimination" as you are trying to use it. Of course you have no leg to stand on though, so you resort to making accusations of people. Here's another piece of advice too, just because you consistently repeat a lie, that doesn't make it any more true. You seem to think if you just keep calling it "discrimination" that it is so or that anyone will be swayed by that. You are wrong. Not everyone is as radical in their ideals, beliefs, or reasoning as you are. That might be hard to get through your thick skull but it's a reality you'll have to deal with someday, like today.

What exactly slick, makes you think a person doesn't have a choice in undergoing procedures as extreme as emasculation, hormone therapy, genital plastic surgery, and so on? I didn't realize someone was holding their neck to the chopping block there. I recognize the concept of all people having the right to choose who they are, but it's an unavoidable fact that if you are a man from day one, no matter what you do to yourself you are a man in death as well. I also recognize and accept letting peoples actions determine who they are as a person. No one is saying anything about who they are as a person, that speaks more to the character and make-up of who the person is, their personality, their ideals and beliefs, personal interests and preferences, not sex. I'm sorry if you were born a man and at some point you decided you wanted to be a woman, that in a literal sense, and the sense that those individuals want it to be, is impossible. You were born what you are and you can't change that.

First of all, drag queens are completely different from this situation, for reasons I believe SalvIsWin mentioned. Second of all, what stops them? The fact they aren't beautiful enough to be there. This woman obviously was.

Yeah genius I know that, but the example served to illustrate another point that neither you or him seemed to get. I did explain it for him though so you can look at my previous post to find out how that applied. Secondly, what stops them is that MEN CAN'T COMPETE, and that's the bottom line because the Canadian Miss Universe Pageant Officials Said So.

Something I find kind of funny here is that as much as you try to paint me as some caricature of a stereotype that you have to paint anyone that you disagree with, you sure don't know shit about me or any of my experiences in life. You just assume I'm this big homophobe, that I hate any and all LGBT people, and I'm this representation of whatever it is you need me to be in order to be right or justified in your lame bullshit trolling. That's why you are a babbling idiot. However, I have been friends and still am friends with a lot of people in the LGBT community, I stand for their rights in the purest sense, and I have known a TON of drag queens in my time and I guarantee YOU wouldn't know the difference until you reached under their skirt whether or not they were a man or woman. But here we are, and YOU are the one who is actually discriminating against drag queens, stating that they aren't beautiful enough, projecting this stereotype of a drag queen that you've conjured up in your own mind, profiling them in the process. Fuck you make this easy!

Ever been to a drag show Mr.Lib? I have, tons of them. It's different, I'll tell you that much. But your exclamation that "What stops them is that they aren't beautiful enough to be there" just shows how little you really know about it, and how detached from that part of society you really are. I live in Iowa, one of the first and only states to legalize gay marriage, one of the only bastions of hope and freedom in this country for LGBT people to go and be free from the fear of real discrimination and being treated like second class citizens. We have a huge Gay Pride parade every year, a large gay community that does not have to hide itself, Plenty of gay owned businesses, and as I mentioned drag shows all the time, it's practically it's own industry here. I couldn't avoid it if I wanted to, but luckily I'm not worried about it. I embraced the LGBT community a long time ago, and they liked having the support. The only difference between me and you is that I support them regardless of what I think of it personally.

You see, someone can personally disagree with homosexuality itself, and still support the rights of those who are homosexual. It's called human fucking decency which you clearly don't have, it's one extreme or the other with you, and that's why you can't understand me. You see, I'm not a fucking extremist, my views don't shift so far to one side of the other like you, and I don't see those whose views differ from my own as lesser people like you do. I frown upon the kind of blatant idiocy you display in your extremism, it makes me fucking sick, but I don't think you less of a person. I just think it's fucking sad that you can't see the separation between someone having personal views that conflict with the views of other people they know, and that same person being able to be friends with those people, support them in their trials, and actually care about them rather than use them and their trials as a tool to demonize people I don't like or disagree with like you do.

That is what is truly sick, and the way you make martyrs of them is a disservice to all the progress that has been made for and by them. They don't want to be martyrs, they just want to be accepted for who they are, and treated with the same respect and dignity that anyone else would demand. I give them that, not because "I am so gracious to be kind to the heathen" as you would make it out to be, but because it's right, and because they do deserve it regardless of whether or not a agree or disagree with being LGBT.


And that's convenient for you, because if you accept this discrimination, it's easy for you to keep blacks out of restaurants, women out of the workplace, and the white man can rightfully take his place as the ruler of the world, right?

You're the only one talking about any of that or bringing it up. Who said anything about keeping blacks out of restaurants, women out of the workplace, or any of the other shit you fabricate in your head? Once again, you can't just accept that it's not an issue of discrimination, because if the person you are arguing with isn't being discriminatory, isn't a racist, isn't trying to keep women out of the workplace, and so on, you are just a bag of hot air spewing stupid shit that has nothing to do with the person you disagree with. It's just a cheap tactic to tear down views you don't like by associating them with people of the opposite extreme you represent.

Yes, and if you were born an atheist, you are an atheist, period. Nothing can change that, and nothing will.

Right?

Wrong again Skip. No one is BORN an atheist, it's an ideology or a philosophy people acquire over time. It's a conscious decision someone makes as it pertains to the existence of God, not a pre-ordained way of thinking. It's a conscious decision, just like someone getting a sex change operation. The point of the whole thing however, is that no amount of operations changes the fact that the individual is indeed a man. Tough noogies on you not being able to comprehend or accept that. That's just what it is, and it's not discriminating against someone to say "I'm sorry, this is a competition for women, and while you appear to be a woman we know you are indeed a man which disqualifies you from competing in this women's only competition". Those are just called RULES. It's obvious you don't like those much either huh? Rules in your mind are "discrimination". Once again, that's why you are the one who is stupid.
 
Main issue is whether or not a beauty pagent is for women or for females. Woman/women are gender terms, a man can identify as a woman, act like a woman, look like a woman, and have surgery to complete this. Female is a sex term, no matter what, this person is still genetically a male - no one is disputing that.

The point that I am saying is that these pagents judge women based on their beauty and their (to a degree) talents. I really don't think having a trans-woman in their pagent really alters what they're judging. Yes, this trans-woman isn't a female, but you've failed to establish why that matters. You can establish that it matters for the Olympics because one person would have a distinct advantage, but for a competition such as this, where's the problem?

The closest thing I have seen to a good argument at this point is, would you allow transvestites to participate in these pagents? As far as I am concerned, these pagents judge something very specific, our concept womanly beauty, so if Jenna the trans-woman best embodies that, so be it.

Edit - If this is a private organization, they can only allow naturally born women, but I think there would be a great deal of unrest here in Canada if they did that.
 
Main issue is whether or not a beauty pagent is for women or for females. Woman/women are gender terms, a man can identify as a woman, act like a woman, look like a woman, and have surgery to complete this. Female is a sex term, no matter what, this person is still genetically a male - no one is disputing that.

Well, that was the most of what I was trying to get at. And simply just that as that is such, technically the "trans-woman" as you put it doesn't qualify as such is the case. But I think we understand each other a bit better now.

The point that I am saying is that these pagents judge women based on their beauty and their (to a degree) talents. I really don't think having a trans-woman in their pagent really alters what they're judging.

Yeah, I can agree with that. It's not like the judging criteria is altered somehow, as you said, what they are judging, so I feel you there definitely.

Yes, this trans-woman isn't a female, but you've failed to establish why that matters. You can establish that it matters for the Olympics because one person would have a distinct advantage, but for a competition such as this, where's the problem?

I think it just comes down to the one stone cold fact that it's a male in a female competition. Although it's not an "athletic contest" as we've established, it's still exclusive to females. It's the same reason a female is not allowed in a "Men Club", because it's just for males, the beauty pageant is just for females.

The closest thing I have seen to a good argument at this point is, would you allow transvestites to participate in these pagents? As far as I am concerned, these pagents judge something very specific, our concept womanly beauty, so if Jenna the trans-woman best embodies that, so be it.

Again, it just comes down to Jenna the trans-woman actually being a guy though. I know it sounds kind of fucked up, but it's just the rules really. I mean, it's females only, kind of common sense really. Davi and Kraz made a good point too about how this individual intentionally deceiving the pageant people, obviously knowing it would automatically disqualify him, and how lying about it in general kind of puts you out the door anyways.

Edit - If this is a private organization, they can only allow naturally born women, but I think there would be a great deal of unrest here in Canada if they did that.

I think it is a private organization, not 100% sure though.
 
Well, that was the most of what I was trying to get at. And simply just that as that is such, technically the "trans-woman" as you put it doesn't qualify as such is the case. But I think we understand each other a bit better now.



Yeah, I can agree with that. It's not like the judging criteria is altered somehow, as you said, what they are judging, so I feel you there definitely.



I think it just comes down to the one stone cold fact that it's a male in a female competition. Although it's not an "athletic contest" as we've established, it's still exclusive to females. It's the same reason a female is not allowed in a "Men Club", because it's just for males, the beauty pageant is just for females.



Again, it just comes down to Jenna the trans-woman actually being a guy though. I know it sounds kind of fucked up, but it's just the rules really. I mean, it's females only, kind of common sense really. Davi and Kraz made a good point too about how this individual intentionally deceiving the pageant people, obviously knowing it would automatically disqualify him, and how lying about it in general kind of puts you out the door anyways.



I think it is a private organization, not 100% sure though.

Yeah, it's owned by Donald Trump ('shudder'). I checked and yes, it is in the rules that you must be a naturally born female, so Jenna is disqualified based on that. That alters my argument a bit, and I would now say that I don't like the rule - I think it's arbitrary.
 
Yeah, it's owned by Donald Trump ('shudder'). I checked and yes, it is in the rules that you must be a naturally born female, so Jenna is disqualified based on that. That alters my argument a bit, and I would now say that I don't like the rule - I think it's arbitrary.

I'm pretty sure the rules also state that contestants can't be married. I think if you are going to make a case for transsexuals you probably need to make one for married women as well.

But who really wants to mess with the purity of women painting their faces and stuffing their surgically enhance figures in to out of date evening gowns using tape after blowing the straight male judge for a chance to be named Ms. Congenial?

Translation, beauty pageants are stupid so I don't expect much from their leaders but then again I'm a professional wrestling fan, therefore I have no ground to judge.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,851
Messages
3,300,884
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top