And that same HOF John Elway never won a title until Shanahan got there. But, I'm sure that's just a coincidence.
They couldn't have done it with out each other.
Exactly. And bad coaches don't win Superbowls. You're arguing like TJChurch right now.
That's a low blow Sly, this isn't even the cage.
First of all, that's bullshit. A good coach is a good coach, until proven differently which has not happened to Shanahan.
His coaching record is under .500 from 2007 and on, he's been on the decline since 2006, and if the Skins don't manage another win this season it'll be the worst record of his career.
Second of all, the Redskins already have more wins this year than they did last year.
Bragging about wins, are we?
Again, five wins puts Shanahan at a career low.
Third of all, this will only be the third losing season he's had since 1995. That's fifteen years of coaching, and only three losing seasons.
This season will be his second losing season in the last four years, as well as a nice little 8-8 in 08. His only winning season in the last four seasons (this one included.) came in came in 06 and and they where only 9-7.
I'd say "What have you done for me now" does apply to coaches, and if you apply it to Shanahan he hasn't done anything in the last 4 years of coaching, probably why the Bronco's cut him.
You're being fucking ridiculous.
If you say so, though the reasoning for my thoughts seems pretty valid.
He had five straight winning seasons from 2002-2006 (including 13-3 in 2005). He didn't coach last year. This is his first year with the Redskins, and with three games to go, they already have a better record than they did last year.
For Shanahan's recent history please go back to the beginning and start over.
5 wins, again it's nothing to brag about.
Again, you're being fucking ridiculous.
Recent history suggests otherwise.
And like I said, Shanahan is at every practice, every film study, every thing his team does. You're going to tell me you know more about his team and players than he does?
I'm telling you that basing this off the statistics and facts that I have available to me, I can only assume that your not on the coaching staff of the Skins as well.
So basing this off the stats available Grossman has not proven himself to be a highly productive football player, and most QB's who hang around the leage for a while don't usually come out of nowhere to be superstars.
It amazes me how so many people seem to forget there's more to the development of a team than just what you see on game day. And as far as the whole "backup" thing goes, Kurt Warner was playing in the Arena League, got his chance when Trent Green went down, and went on to be a Hall of Fame QB.
It doesn't happen all that often, so thinking it's gonna happen with Grossman is like thinking I'm going to win the lottery tonight.
If the guy that goes to the Redskins facility every day thinks Grossman is better for his team now and/or in the future, than I'll trust his word FAR more than I'll trust the word of a guy who obviously has a personal bias against him.
No personal bias here, his career stats just don't get my dick up like they do yours.
I think anyone would take a professionals opinion over that of an amateur, but I'm pretty sure neither of us are professional football coaches here.
I was ranked number 6 in the world in Madden 05, if that counts for anything.
You mean the sixth round pick Terrell Davis? How about sixth round Mike Anderson, who ran for over 1,000 yards in his rookie season? Or fourth round pick Olandis Gary, or third round pick Reuben Droughns, or second round picks Tatum Bell and Clinton Portis, all of whom ran for over 1,000 yards under Shanahan?
Shanahan's been known to have the dirtiest O-line in the game, his guys get repeated chop block fouls and fines, he runs a dirty system, it's good but it
dirty.
Some of those guys are products of a system, some of them are skilled, and TD was skilled and took advantage of a good running system. Shanahan wasn't out there picking up rushing yards so you still gotta credit the running back as well.
I guess Shanahan just happens to be the luckiest coach on Earth, to luck into so many great running backs no one else knows about, and seems to have their best success under Shanahan.
A good running system is one tiny part of being a head coach, so he's turned out a few 1000 yard rushers, a couple of those guys did on losing teams, so it means nothing in the end. A thousand yard season with a 7-9 record not much to brag about there.
Again, you're being fucking ridiculous.
Iyo.
Who knows why he was released.
I'd say his recent lack of success and steady downhill drop in production.
I would think that, as a San Diego Chargers fan, you would know as well as any that coaches don't always get released based upon their winning percentage (how has that transition from Marty Schottenheimer to Norv Turner worked out for you anyways). And how well has Denver played since Shanahan was there?
They did Marty wrong, and I can't blame Norv.
Well In 09 the Broncos where 8-8 same as they where with Shanahan in 08, and they have the potential to reach 5 wins, maybe even surpass what Shanahan has done this year.
There are many reasons Shanahan may have been released, but considering the fact the man has been a proven winner, has only three losing seasons in 15 years
Let's not forget recent history now.
and already has given the Redskins a better record than they had last year
This is like the third time you've referenced those five wins, those are some low expectations there Sly.
not to mention the fact he's the one who is around for all workouts, practices, plays, etc.
Good call, got me there; but you're not that either, so it's kinda irrelevant.
I'm going to trust Shanahan far more than I'll trust you.
Can't argue with you choosing the pro, but I doubt Shanahan can give you an unbiased look at his recent history like I just did.