If that is the case, when what you meant to say was wrong./quote]
That is not the case. What I meant to say is what I said, & is correct. What you then said about what I said is wrong. (Also, "when what I meant to say..." did what?)
Facts do not need to be proven to be facts, I agree. But this is the bit you are having trouble navigating. I'm not asking you to derive a mathematical function, I'm not asking that you prove the existence of God, I don't want you to set up a new economy for Thailand. What people are asking you to do is well within your means. Although the truth of the matter is, of course, beyond my alteration, you could very easily demonstrate that you were right and put all of this to rest.
More simply, if you wanted to prove to people that your case in the argument with Brain was the correct one, you could do it. The fact that you are desperately trying not to raises questions about the strength of your word.
I am not having trouble navigating anything. I am also not trying to go without proving my statement to be correct.
Here is what you are having trouble navigating: We seem to agree that facts can be facts without a proving statement, yet you seem to then be asking me to prove something I never stated to be factual.
I proved that you didn't understand irony. So did you. If nothing else, I've proven at least one thing.
Neither of us have proven that, & we never will... Any more than anyone here will prove Stones' lyrics belong to Tom Petty.
But yes, your stance on the validity of your statements is a very convenient and appropriate one.
My stance on the validity of my statements is far better than that of many who have made statements in this thread on theirs.
Statements don't need to be proven to be true. Is that because you can't shot them to be true any other way?
"Statements don't need to be proven to be true", but if they are easily disproven, they are clearly untrue. Also, I have never held a gun, so no need to discuss my shooting anything.
Speculation's overlap is that is can be either true or false.
"...is that is..."? That is not a complete sentence... One of many ways you have avoided posting truth in this thread.
And, in fact, it's my grasp on the concepts of truth and lies that has helped me to distinguish that you are full of shit. But, once again, I simply speculated that no moderator had green-repped you for anything you've said in quite some time, and especially not with example to anything you've said in this thread.
I'd check your ability to distinguish anything, especially since we have both proven your so-called "grasp" on such things is full of problems.
I don't know whether it's true or not, but based on knowing that no moderator here is an idiot, I would find it difficult to conceive of one finding anything to agree with in your limp-wristed words.
I would agree if you knew no Mods here were idiots. However, that has been disproven many times by the Mods themselves, so we can forget about that idea.
Translation: I wouldn't call you a liar (even though I already have earlier on) but.... YOU A LIAR! Claiming things not as they are = lying. Don't think too hard man, you might have a seizure.
YOU A SEIZURE! Did I leave the forums & enter a ghetto? Can you buy a verb next time?
That's an interpretation you've taken upon yourself. Only he would know if it's accurate.
Then let him tell me or not, & don't waste the little time you do to post here again.
Just because you don't know what is required of you to exit this place, doesn't mean you aren't in the process of fulfilling that criteria as we speak.
I would agree, if not for the fact that the same person who put me here said my release would never happen.
And I'm sorry if you don't like people talking about things other than the subject of this thread. But they are the rules of this forum, and people are allowed to come and go freely, deviating from the topic if they wish within a spam region. If you could have followed the rules, you'd be allowed the same luxury.
I followed the rules that were clear. It has already been stated that my violation was simply a subjective opinion.
Once again, you are working on his clock. He is in the position of power and you are in a poor position because you broke the rules of the forum. He doesn't need to respond at all. But it stands to reason that even if he didn't respond, being a model poster would ensure the best chance of leaving here and as early as possible.This would entail thoughtful, logical posting with a more humble and reserved attitude to people.
I didn't break any rules that were clearly stated in a non-subjective manner. Also, he has already said I won't get out, so there is no clock. Lastly, much the way posts don't count in this area, it seems to matter not how I say anything or what I say here, as it has no effect on my release.
Or that you broke the rules...
That has yet to be proven as anything more than opinion.
I'm sure you could make your release happen without having to be told what to do to attain it.
Being that I was told it would never happen, nothing I do will surely attain it.
You should probably stop saying them until you can prove them to be true.
Much the way we agree facts need not be proven to be true, not showing the proof myself doesn't mean it does not exist. I can read & post in limited areas on these forums. Others can read & post in many more, so they can find the same ones I can, & perhaps (probably) more.
Why do you have such an issue supporting your own statements?
I have no such issue. I know the proof to exist, & have stated that it does. If others want to find it, they can do the searching. I thought we already agreed there need not be shown proof for statements to be facts.
You just say things and expect people to believe them because you have said them. Who are you that is so knowledgeable a bastion of the truth, that you need never to have evidence for a claim that you make? Nobody could boast that accolade, especially not you.
You say this despite the fact that in the same post & seemingly to me, you have already agreed with me things need not be proven to be facts.
No, literally what I said.
Which refers to something that never happened/existed.
You might want to re-word this as at the present, it's nonsensical.
You might want to re-read it.
I have made the odd mistake, quite uncharacteristic. It's good advice regardless.
It may be good advice, but not to me. (Also, your mistakes don't seem all that "odd" or "uncharacteristic".)
I wouldn't take that as quite so favourable an accomplishment as you'd like. The majority of people here joke, discuss and get along with one another well without breaking any pre-determined rules. Is this the sort of demographic you;d like to exclude yourself from?
Not in the least... I did all of those things as well; I simply (proverbially) ran into someone in power who felt in their opinion I did something wrong. As this was a person in power, I was placed here, & many others pretended to share the same opinion.
You don't even have to be totally conceited and delusional to realize you aren't the smartest member who's ever patrolled these forums.
No, but the fact I realize that may be one of many things that proves me to not be ******ed. (Even if I am not the smartest ever, it seems I am the smartest to post in this thread.)
That's cute... Almost as much as your attempts at stating facts & using correct spelling & grammar.
Nothing I say requires a response. You can choose to continue this charade or discontinue it. My point is, either route shows you backing up on one of the claims you have made, becoming yet another source of your falsities.
As I believe I said before, many of lower intelligence (such as yourself) would wait some time for a response, & getting none, would feel (& perhaps state here) that I was admitting they were correct & the victors in this exchange.
Also, it appears you (like others) are saying I claimed some things to be facts that I never did.
Apart from yourself, who do you think you are convincing? I suppose you don't really care, all you need is your self-belief to ensure you don't have a psychological breakdown. But in truth, you have been proven to lie many times in the space of this thread, not least of them that statement.
As has been stated before, I appreciate irony, such as the fact I have not been proven to lie much if at all, which leads to much of that very statement to be proven false.
Where? Could you warn me when you start?
I started long ago... Simply never post again, or the job may never end.
