Match-type Suggestion: Last Blood

[Serious Mozzarella]

So I was in Doc's BlogTV, and we came up with this awesome idea. Check it out:

This would probably work better with TNA, seeing as you can't show blood on WWE programming, but I would like to see it on WWE programming, so here goes. It's called a Last Blood match. Basically, the premise of the match is to wrestle until each person starts bleeding. Then you keep wrestling. The first person to STOP bleeding from their wounds, either by scabbing, or by passing out from a loss of blood, loses. The last man standing wins.

I think these could make for some good, lengthy matches to show off wrestler talent.

Thoughts?

 

[Ruthless-RKO]

Damn, there would be toooooooooo much blood..and in TNA the only guy I could see being used in this match is ABYSS!! this match has Abyss written all over it...

Doesn't really sound that good of a match..yes it would show talent, but losing blood will only slow them down, not show much...

Might as well have the ref cut both wrestlers at the start of the match!!

 

[Dhays9]

I think it should be the first person to stop bleeding win. Because whats stopping me from just cutting myself in that type of match. You would just have two guys going at it and they get cut. Then what. They stop attacking each other and every time they are close to not bleeding anymore they cut themselves with what ever object they have.

You should have it to where the winner wins by either: A). The opponent passes out due to blood lost or B). Have the person who stops bleeding first win or C). Not sure excatly how this would work but after a time limit the person who has the least amount of blood on them or blood loss wins.

Its a concept that has a lot a bugs. I don't wann be negative but its just kinda dumb the way you stated it.

 

[bookerman]

It would be kinda hard to have a predetermined finish in such a match, unless it ends with someone passing out every time. And another thing, how do you determine if a person has stopped bleeding and what if someone legitimately stops, but isn't supposed to be the winner. Don't want to sound offensive, but it reminds me of something out of WCW 2000. Still, it would be a fresh concept, if it could be done right.

 

[Tastycles]

Terrible idea, to be honest. Firstly, how would you predetermine that outcome? But more importantly, a match like that would have to be brutal, and then you'd have to stop hitting each other and wait for wounds to heal. Also, in what world is it better to get repeatedly hit, so your wounds don't heal but the other person's do? It has absolutely no method of occuring with a suspense of disbelief.

 

[Hollywood Naitch]

Am I reading this right....you are suggesting a match that only ends when all but one wrestler has passed out from blood loss or their wounds scap over... this is one of the most ridiculous match ideas I have ever read. Sorry, but I just cannot see this working

The only "last blood" idea I could see ever being used in mainstream US wrestling, would be a multi-person last blood match. Has this ever been done? The way to win would be the same as a regular first-blood match, and when you bleed you are eliminated. When all but 1 man has been busted open, the match ends and the uninjured wrestler is the winner.