klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Not to mention no baggage with Griffey. There's no "Jr. being Jr." bullshit to deal with.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
^^^^All of Jrs stats are based off of more at bats. Therefore he should have more.
According to baseball reference Manny has more doubles, higher RBI's, higher on base percentage, and a higher slugging percentage. Define fielding? It's not like Manny is an errors machine, Manny's career FP is .978. Ken Griffeys is .985.
Manny's 162 game average consists of 39 doubles, 41 homeruns, 133 RBi's, a .314 BA, a .411 OBP, and a slugging percentage of .593.
Griffeys 162 game average is 32 doubles, 39 Homeruns, a 288 BA, 114 RBi's, a .373 OBP, and .547 Slugging Percentage.
First of all, the idea that Griffey didn't take steroids is just funny to me. At this point, I think it strange that people believe that Griffey didn't take steroids. While I'm always a "innocent until proven guilty" fan, for such a talented athlete like Griffey was, his body sure did deteriorate awful fast. I mean, Griffey should have been in the prime of his life, and yet, his body kept failing him. And, look at the injuries he was getting: repeatedly injuring his hamstrings and tendons, two classic steroid induced injuries. And all of that occurring between 2000-2005, the prime steroid years? Like I said, while I guess I'll still have to maintain that Griffey was steroid free, that doesn't mean I believe it.
But, as far as being a great player, Bonds pre-steroids, still is amazing. As far as natural talent goes, I think Bonds is every bit the player Griffey was, just with a worse attitude and the ability to turn media against him. I think that the biggest difference between Bonds and Griffey was their charm with the media. I think if it had been the other way around, then Bonds would be favored over Griffey, as far as "great players" go.
But yeah, Griffey not on steroids? Not buying it.
He ran the wrong statistics then. Very good player, but definitely not elite to that extent.
I pretty much debunked the Griffey Steroid bullshit with him playing in the Kingdome on concrete for the first ten years of his career and going balls deep every night. The Kid was relatviely injury free while in Seattle, and it simply caught up to him.
Griffey didn't have other guys in the lineup like Manny had in Boston, and Griffey somehow managed to make the all century team, and have ten gold gloves in the AL.
These are fine. I would argue that the extra muscke mass of steroids puts extra stress on joints and tendons, which were the areas that Griffey had trouble with. But you're a Griffey fan, so he's perfect.I'm not arguing Biggio's worth, but he had a relatively low average and on-base percentage. I don't really think sabermetrics tells the true story so I won't go there. Minus 4-5 seasons he was average in the field. I'd definintely vote for him for the hall of fame. If we're including steroids users Biggio isn't top 5, really.
Griffey's body was destroyed because it was never preserved. Steroids enhance your career longetivity. Your arguement for gold gloves holds semi-true, but there was no questioning Griffey in the outfield. Simply amazing.
1. Arod
2. Bonds
3. Griffey- Steroids would have preserved his body
4. Manny
5. Piazza
6. Pudge
7. Chipper
8. Sosa
9. McGwire
10. Frank Thomas
Biggio was a very good, solid, contributing player. These guys carried their teams. I'm not sure Biggio was a higher instrument to the Astros success as was Bagwell,
who put up very impressive numbers in a very pitcher's friendly park.
Biggio's doubles definitely were aided by that, Bagwell's HRs were not.
I had problems quoting it for some reason (?) I'll post it in an easy-to-quote format.
Your body would wear down years after the false muscle mass wore down. That's why many injury prone players are healthy while on them. I never said the man was perfect, he was actually an idiot. Why not lift, stretch, and do all you can do to preserve your career?
Piazza was terrible behind the plate yet amazing while standing up next to it. He was twice the hitter Biggio was.
OK, after doing some research, I will grant you that Pudge had a batter career than I thought, but I would still take Biggio over Pudge. It is tough to give any baseball reasons, like "you build up the middle" but Biggio was a guy who could play any position on the field and hit anywhere in the lineup.He's the best fielding catcher of this generation, and arguably of all time. He had no bad seasons offensively during his prime.
The leader on all of those teams was SmoltzChipper Jones has been the Braves leader,
Lance Berkman might argue with that.the best switch hitter of this generation,
one of the most consistent, a far better overall hitter than Biggio, and unlike Biggio, has a World Series ring.
Sammy Sosa is obviously on our steroids list, but look at 1993-2004, he put up massive production. When did his assumed steroid stages begin? He didn't suck before 1997/98.
And McGwire was better than everyone else at doing that. His career average was only .18pts lower than Biggio's and had his OBP was .61 pts higher. He was better than Biggio.
Frank Thomas had a few GREAT years.
I thought I had included Jeter, I guess I bypassed him. He's better than Biggio as well.
Perhaps Bagwell could have driven in even more runs had Biggio been more solid getting on base.
What are you talking about? That proves my point. He had great success playing in a huge stadium throughout his prime. I'm not sure if there was a counter point in there.