jacdnwarrior
Championship Contender
Nash has a right to his opinion, but hes completely off the mark here. Its not the size, its the ability to entertain and do the work in the ring.
Benoit and Guerrero were great in-ring performers and had put together decent runs as champions. In Benoits case, in terms of matches and the numbers (ppv buyrates and television ratings)he was gradually delivering solid to good results and the truth is if he hadnt abruptly dropped the title, he probably could have had a solid run for 8-12 months minimum.
The other problem with his comments are these guys werent the first non giants to have the belt. Randy Savage wasnt a giant when he was champion. Bret Hart, HBK werent big men when they held the titles. Austin and Rock werent giants but not really small either, would he have turned them away because of size ? You need to be insane to think its only about size. If that were the case, Khali should never be without the belt.
And what does this say if we say we want only big men ? Youll have every kid popping pills and sticking a damn needle in his ass trying to achieve that physique. E.g. Batista among others. Talent on the mike, solid in ring storytelling , an ability to entertain is what matters, the size of the performer might be something you prefer but size can't replace those qualities.
Benoit and Guerrero were great in-ring performers and had put together decent runs as champions. In Benoits case, in terms of matches and the numbers (ppv buyrates and television ratings)he was gradually delivering solid to good results and the truth is if he hadnt abruptly dropped the title, he probably could have had a solid run for 8-12 months minimum.
The other problem with his comments are these guys werent the first non giants to have the belt. Randy Savage wasnt a giant when he was champion. Bret Hart, HBK werent big men when they held the titles. Austin and Rock werent giants but not really small either, would he have turned them away because of size ? You need to be insane to think its only about size. If that were the case, Khali should never be without the belt.
And what does this say if we say we want only big men ? Youll have every kid popping pills and sticking a damn needle in his ass trying to achieve that physique. E.g. Batista among others. Talent on the mike, solid in ring storytelling , an ability to entertain is what matters, the size of the performer might be something you prefer but size can't replace those qualities.