KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 1148 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

If Brock Lesnar never left the company in 04, Orton probably never becomes the youngest world champ in history right? So in that case, would it of been likely Orton would have been in Batistas position at WM21/the face of 2005 with John Cena if Lesnar never left?

Edit: Just realized they probably would have never gone down the path they did if Lesnar was still in the company. Chances are he probably would have been one of them, so stupid question, don't worry about the answer.

Another question does come out of this. Since there were 2 titles at the time and it would be safe to assume that Brock would have been the focal point of one of those titles, who would you think WWE would have picked of the 3 (Cena, Orton, Batista) to put over with the other title?
 
Another question does come out of this. Since there were 2 titles at the time and it would be safe to assume that Brock would have been the focal point of one of those titles, who would you think WWE would have picked of the 3 (Cena, Orton, Batista) to put over with the other title?

Batista at first, then Cena.

Now how would Becca answer the same question? Or is picking one HBK over another blasphemy for her?

"I would take Shawn any way he wants me. ANY WAY."
 
In the lead up to the GAB 2007 it looked like they were going to have Lashley beat John Cena, was there a reason why that never happened?

Not that I know of.

With Cena taking more time off for filming, do you think he takes the pin this Sunday?

Not likely. Now it's very likely two weeks from this Sunday when it's the Smackdown pay per view instead of the Raw one.
 
Not likely. Now it's very likely two weeks from this Sunday when it's the Smackdown pay per view instead of the Raw one.

I also read somewhere that Ambrose might well be taking some time off after No Mercy, so if true, I can see him taking the pin and keeping open the chance of Cena vs AJ down the line again.
 
Bennett vs. Carter was great and Rex vs. Galloway could be very good if they didn't have the stupid tournament rules. Cody is intriguing as well. Lashley is horribly dull and Bennett feels like nothing now that he's in the feud with Moose.
 
Not likely. Now it's very likely two weeks from this Sunday when it's the Smackdown pay per view instead of the Raw one.

Whoops. You know what I meant.



Yeah what you said. :disappointed:

Still not used to the brand split PPVs. How long do you think they'll last? It's much easier now with the network, but I'm thinking the brand split idea will come and go as they see fit.
 
Whoops. You know what I meant.



Yeah what you said. :disappointed:

Still not used to the brand split PPVs. How long do you think they'll last? It's much easier now with the network, but I'm thinking the brand split idea will come and go as they see fit.

Years probably and that can be good or bad given the time.

Cody Rhodes Vs ??? at Bound For Glory?

Vs. the rest of the Bound For Gold field.
 
Does TNA really think BFG is worth $50? the upcoming ROH PPV (which happens on the Fri. before BFG) is only $35 & that looks infinity more entertaining.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top