KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 1092 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Thoughts on the Mean Street Posse?

Watching the 99-2000 Raws, they aren't as bad as I remember. For guys who weren't actually wrestlers (Pete & Rodney), I think they were alright.
 
Is HHH vs. Ambrose a better story than HHH/Reigns at this point? I know its very likely a red herring, but his pursuit of respect/the title has been one of the best things the E' has done in the main event in a good while.

Also, in the unlikely event that we do get swerved and Ambrose emerges as #1 contender, where does Reigns go? Versus Taker? Would that be something you could get behind?

Story yes, draw no.

Probably vs. Lesnar again.

Thoughts on the Mean Street Posse?

Watching the 99-2000 Raws, they aren't as bad as I remember. For guys who weren't actually wrestlers (Pete & Rodney), I think they were alright.

Goofy fun and that's all they were supposed to be.
 
I was watching one of those "How WM should be booked" video's on Youtube last night, & the guy in the video suggested that Ambrose should win the triple threat & get the title shot vs. Triple H at WM, & that Reigns should turn heel after he loses, & lose his shit on Ambrose, & over the next few weeks starting cutting promos where he basically tells the fan to go fuck themselves because he's tried doing things the "hero" way & the fans boo him, & he's beaten everybody, & then eventually Taker walks out & cuts some doom & gloom deadman promo basically saying "you haven't beat me" & challenging Reigns to a match at Mania, Reigns accepts & says he's going to do more than beat Taker at Mania, he's going to end him, blah blah blah. Is this something WWE should consider? I mean outside of Triple H they don't really have another top heel at the moment & a Reigns heel turn does set up a nice Ambrose/Reigns feud post mania.
 
Is there a reason why in the continual search for comedy partners for either Goldust or Kane, they've not tagged the two up? Seems like it could be a great comedy team with some serious legs?
 
I recently heard a rumor that the reason WWE is having the Uso's, Ziggles, & seemingly everyone else on their roster using superkicks so damn much is suppose to be WWE taking a shot at the Young Bucks. Is their any chance there could be any truth to these rumors, & if so where would you rank this among the stupid, pointless shots WWE has fired?
 
It wouldn't surprise me though I haven't heard that.

Rather up there as I doubt most common WWE fans have ever seen a Bucks match.
 
I like Reigns vs. Undertaker but not Ambrose vs. HHH.

As a storyline itself or just the match?



Also, with regards to Taker vs Reigns; I've been thinking about that more and more. I really feel that would be the perfect way for Taker to go out and for Roman to get some insane heel heat coming out of Mania. Which is why WWE won't go for it.
 
Might have something to do with Ambrose's punches being looser than my stool after three cups of coffee and a bowl of Raisin Bran.
 
Although it still is very likely Roman vs HHH at Mania will happen, do you think that WWE have done a good job in actually building up that all 3 could quite easily be anyone facing HHH? To me I feel they have put a bit of reason behind everyone and I haven't quite seen WWE do this in quite a while which has been very good.
 
Is it true that Scott Hall was never in a Rumble match? If so that's up there with Devon Dudley as the biggest Rumble non wrestler surprise.
 
Although it still is very likely Roman vs HHH at Mania will happen, do you think that WWE have done a good job in actually building up that all 3 could quite easily be anyone facing HHH? To me I feel they have put a bit of reason behind everyone and I haven't quite seen WWE do this in quite a while which has been very good.

It does to a degree but if you haven't noticed, they're intentionally implying that it WON'T be Roman, which makes it clear that it will be him.

Is it true that Scott Hall was never in a Rumble match? If so that's up there with Devon Dudley as the biggest Rumble non wrestler surprise.

Not really as he always had the IC Title. He was in the WWF World Title match in 1993 (one of his two World Title matches ever, including house shows I believe), then IC Title every year until he left.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top