KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 886 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

In WWE and WCW it is usually easy to tell who is face or heel based off of the wrestlers costume/attire. Do you think costumes are important for determining whether someone is face or heel?
 
Why isn't Brutus Beefcake ever featured or highlighted on WWE programming? Wasn't he booked to win the IC title at some point(s) but couldn't due to injuries?

He was one of my faves as a kid and, if WWE inducted Koko B. Ware into the HOF, shouldn't Brutus be inducted at some point?
 
I hate to say this but my interest in Reigns vs Lesnar specifically is dwindling, what can WWE do to fix this? Why didn't they go with Triple H I don't think he's hot enough for him now if they go with it.
 
Everything save for the main event is cold right now. They're not putting any interest in things and it's hurting a lot. Reigns will likely beat HHH on his way to the title. The Rumble will help a lot.
 
Since this came up in the TNA LD tonight and I'm not sure if you saw since you weren't very active.

Someone asked if a best of series ever ended before the 5 or7 matches were all done?
 
Here's something I've noticed: Back in the day it was no big deal for two top wrestlers to wrestle a series of matches in a short period of time even on TV. Ric Flair and Sting had six TV matches for the NWA Championship over a four month period in '87-'88 for example (this isn't even counting the matches at arena shows, this just what was shown on TV). Nowadays, if two top guys wrestle on TV twice in two months for the title people scream "WHY ARE WE DOING THIS AGAIN!!!!!". Wassup with that?
 
Here's something I've noticed: Back in the day it was no big deal for two top wrestlers to wrestle a series of matches in a short period of time even on TV. Ric Flair and Sting had six TV matches for the NWA Championship over a four month period in '87-'88 for example (this isn't even counting the matches at arena shows, this just what was shown on TV). Nowadays, if two top guys wrestle on TV twice in two months for the title people scream "WHY ARE WE DOING THIS AGAIN!!!!!". Wassup with that?

Piggybacking off this question(because my answer would surely involve the illogical/chaotic fantasy booking the IWC comes up with), would you enjoy watching/reviewing a theoretical wrestling promotion that was booked entirely by the IWC? It would have to be at least somewhat funny in its stupidity, right? :shrug:

How long until your head exploded?
 
Here's something I've noticed: Back in the day it was no big deal for two top wrestlers to wrestle a series of matches in a short period of time even on TV. Ric Flair and Sting had six TV matches for the NWA Championship over a four month period in '87-'88 for example (this isn't even counting the matches at arena shows, this just what was shown on TV). Nowadays, if two top guys wrestle on TV twice in two months for the title people scream "WHY ARE WE DOING THIS AGAIN!!!!!". Wassup with that?

Well first of all most of the matches aren't as good as Sting vs. Flair. Also the NWA gets a bigger benefit of the doubt over today's WWE, which looks inept more often than not.

Piggybacking off this question(because my answer would surely involve the illogical/chaotic fantasy booking the IWC comes up with), would you enjoy watching/reviewing a theoretical wrestling promotion that was booked entirely by the IWC? It would have to be at least somewhat funny in its stupidity, right? :shrug:

How long until your head exploded?

Oh dear goodness that gave me a chill.
 
Well first of all most of the matches aren't as good as Sting vs. Flair. Also the NWA gets a bigger benefit of the doubt over today's WWE, which looks inept more often than not.

True, but I'm pretty sure if I took time to look I'd find examples of lesser main event level talents than Flair and Sting doing the same thing in that era. Then again, you're quite correct about the WWE ineptness and I'd add the current WWE's matches are pretty much all cookie-cutter/formula matches. I guess I'm of the mind that in that case I'd be complaining about the cookie-cutter match formula and not about which two guys are going at it again in a repeat. But that's just me :p


Oh dear goodness that gave me a chill.

It's maybe a theme for a new horror movie: "Before you die you see IWC fantasy booking" :lmao:
 
Do you think that WWE should have figured what they're going to do with Xavier Woods and co before they debuted them
 
Do you think WWE should start using more of their former legends as on screen managers/mentors to young talent?

Ric Flair (I know he's done a bit with Miz in the past), Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels etc, even Hogan... would they be of use?
 
Indirect TNA spoiler:
Reading the TNA spoilers begs one question: has TNA relegated BFG to a One Night Only caliber PPV? Seriously, where is the interest in buying the show if you don't build it up and tape shows that happen afterwards in kayfabe? I can get taping shows, but at least keep the chronology intact. Watching BFG and having the wrestlers act like they were no tapings forces incredible suspense of disbelief.

I guessed they'd deliver one big bang before going out, but apparently not. Does the treatment of their (former) flagship show prove that TNA is beyond repair?
 
I've been saying that for weeks. I have no idea what they're doing at that show and there are only three Impacts left. There's no interest in it and I have a feeling it's going to be a standard Us vs. Them show, which they already did at Global Impact Japan.
 
How are Team 3D going to be inducted to the TNA Hall of Fame when Bully Ray doesn't even have a TNA contract?

What is Wrestler's Court?

What is the IWC's obsession with Dean Ambrose? I've seen Facebook posts with people saying he is the next Stone Cold.

Pause for a minute...

Stone Cold led the WWE against the WCW. Dean Ambrose led.....what? I mean he's good and entertaining, but Ambrose is nowhere near Austin's level at Ambrose's stage...right? Or am I missing something that the IWC isn't?
 
He's signed to appear at the show.

A kangaroo court to keep things fun for the locker room. You might have a wrestler on trial for something like hitting on a Diva and a veteran is both prosecutor and judge. There will be witnesses and testimonies and usually the penalty is buying the judge beer etc. It's just a fun thing the wrestlers do.

Ambrose is good but there will not be another Austin. That's a once ever talent.
 
Why isn't Paul Ellering's name mentioned when people talk about the greatest manager's in history? Granted he was no Heenan or Heyman, but managing the greatest tag team ever for the better part of fifteen years deserves merit right?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top