KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 732 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

That has happened before. I believe it was Cena who accidentally eliminated Alex Riley, which caused a problem later in the match.
 
1997 is consider by many to be one of the best years for the WWE from a wrestling product standpoint. However, WCW was still beating them in the ratings weekly. While WCW was outdrawing WWE, was WWE still profitable during 97, and puting up good numbers and byrates that just fell short of WCW? Or were they far off and hurting bad?
 
Hurting bad. The problem was back then, you had to watch one or the other show. Also you probably couldn't afford all the PPVs from both companies and WCW was getting the money.
 
Hey KB, hope everything is well with you. I would like to know what's your take on the overexposure of the WWE product - specially in what you think that can contribute to create new stars.
 
There's too much TV but it's making them money which is the right idea.

New stars could be created by letting the guys have some individuality. Stop having writers control everything and let the guys' personalities shine.
 
You think there's anything in how often they've mentioned WCW the last couple of weeks?
 
I know you don't do fantasy booking, but TNA's World Title picture; once AJ/Bully has concluded who would you like to see gunning for the gold?
 
Here are a few of my thoughts and like to know what you think from one fan to another:

On a scale 1-10 with the thought of Ryback being a face what are the chances of a Heyman/Punk reunion inside HIAC I know that initially the program of Punk/Heyman was something similiar to Heyman/Lesnar program with Heyman being destroyed on SD inside the cage in 2003 by Lesnar

With some rumors of Cena/Taker at WM I think at HIAC we will see a much more aggressive Cena we have seen in a while IMO even for a short period from RR up to WM Cena must be some sort of a heel Is this a good idea or is it that WWE still doesn't believe in anyone else being top face than Cena
 
I was thinking at some point before the end of his career even on a short term basis Cena if the story makes sense must be heel IMO he isn't pre-WCW Hogan and for sure he isn't Steamboat IMO against Taker even for a two month period him being heel wouldn't hurt the bottom line all depending on what they are doing with faces like Bryan and if Punk is still a face at the time for WM Season
 
I agree with you that it should be a short term basis and then reviewed after a WM I am not one of the fans that believes he should turn just for the sake I am bored to a certain extent of his character direction He should only turn for a short term if it makes sense

Do you think some of us older fans have been spoiled by the attitude years with SCSA I think one reason why some of the rabid SCSA fans and I am one of them is that we have followed his career and realized his talents and just wanted the best company to make him a star
 
If WWE didn't have the no blood policy would it make sense Heyman to be a bloody mess inside HIAC

IMO when HHH/HBK had their "Final Encounter" inside HIAC years ago that was a perfect ending do you think their proposed upcoming WM match won't match any of their previous matches especially the bloody HIAC match they had

My last question is about the upcoming WM:
With the rumored matches so far what do you think the buys would be
If we put Hogan in a non-wrestling capacity what would the buys be like
Final one is what would WM buys be like if Sting was to wrestle in his final ever match
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top