KB Answers Wrestling Questions

[Pay Per Ghost]

To be honest, if you've seen one Sheamus match, you've seen'em all. I ain't saying he downright boring, but I'm not against that notion either. He has a few here and there with a gimmick that are good enough.

What would you say to a last Angle WWE run?

 

[klunderbunker]

I'm a Sheamus fan. I like the brawling style he has.

I'd rather have Angle run into a sanitarium before he goes nuts.

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

I do too. I have often wondered is he the most stiff worker in the WWE at the moment?

The fact is, though his quite nimble on his feet and can go full steam in the ring, he is just becoming boring to watch. There is no emotional investment. Hasn't been one for a good year. He needs a big feud, personal feud, something above hey-ho-i'm-a-good-guy routine.

Brock's gonna be around right? Brock/Sheamus would be awesome. I wouldn't take Sheamus as someone who couldn't go toe-to-toe with Brock. Kayfabely speaking, it would suspend by disbelief that Sheamus can take a badass like Brock because of his style. Thoughts?

 

[klunderbunker]

Sheamus vs. Brock is one of the matches I've wanted to see for awhile.

 

[cawsnallthis]

I don't know. That Kofi kick to the dome of the Miz was pretty stiff to me

 

[Martin Gabriel]

Do you think Randy Orton is a great wrestler and can cut good promos?

 

[klunderbunker]

Yeah.

 

[Martin Gabriel]

Well this guy just told me otherwise lol.

Here's what he said:

"I have always found Orton to be overrated. He can't wrestle, he can't cut a decent promo, he's boring as hell. The only reason he still has a job is because of his popularity."

 

[klunderbunker]

He's an idiot.

 

[TLC]

I do too. I have often wondered is he the most stiff worker in the WWE at the moment?

The fact is, though his quite nimble on his feet and can go full steam in the ring, he is just becoming boring to watch. There is no emotional investment. Hasn't been one for a good year. He needs a big feud, personal feud, something above hey-ho-i'm-a-good-guy routine.

Brock's gonna be around right? Brock/Sheamus would be awesome. I wouldn't take Sheamus as someone who couldn't go toe-to-toe with Brock. Kayfabely speaking, it would suspend by disbelief that Sheamus can take a badass like Brock because of his style. Thoughts?

If you can believe Triple H against Brock, you should believe Sheamus since Sheamus was the one who put Triple H out until Wrestlemania 27.

Anyway, would you have swapped the six man tag opener at WM for any of the other matches?

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

If you can believe Triple H against Brock, you should believe Sheamus since Sheamus was the one who put Triple H out until Wrestlemania 27.

I wouldn't say that.The premise for that to be valid, Hunter, upon his return should've attacked Sheamus. He got the rub at Extreme Rules but he didn't put Hunter out til Mania 27. Logically that doesn't make sense.


Best Sheamus match?

 

[Барбоса]

More or less.

What would you like to see happen with the Shield?

I would say that after RAW and the likely 6-man at Extreme Rules, they will take the Tag Titles from Hell No (maybe defending them Freebird style to keep all three wrestling) but I would be more interested in them going after one of the world titles as it would be something new and in a way they are the perfect vehicle to face Cena - bullies vs the good guy with the added level of him not being able to beat them when he had two world champion partners so how can he do it against all three by himself.

Also, after just rewatching large parts of RAW, the Undertaker was the first guy I have seen to immediately look towards the correct side of the arena when the Shield's music played - a real veteran more. He knew where the camera was!

 

[#MrScissorsKick]

How weird/dull/different will Wrestlemania be when Undertaker is gone?

 

[Fire Marshall Bill]

Well, Weed's not a drug so what are you speaking of?

If caffeine, nicotine and alcohol are considered drugs, then surely the THC in weed is as well. But I see your point. Semantics.

So I'm coming back onto this website and seeing these "reports" about Ryback being full blown heel and teaming with DZ next week. I still believe it's way too early to call him a full blown heel. Wouldn't it build him much better as a threat to Cena (or whoever) if he ends up getting pissed off in the match and he destroys all 3 people? Or maybe DZ and ADR get off light by escaping early and they fight down the ramp while Ryback has his way with Cena? And where does Mark Henry fit in all this? The only way he disappears entirely is if Ryback is going full heel I think.

Nevermind. Henry comes down for the DQ, DZ and ADR escape, and the 3 of them go at it in the ring with Henry coming out on top this week. I like it. Sets up a 3 way and lets Cena pin Henry, which in WWE's mind, will protect Ryback.

 

[Fire Marshall Bill]

Do you see any gold on Ryback in 2013?

 

[pshanbhag92]

What do you think of Sheamus?

Top 3 smartest guys in history of pro-wrestling?
Top 3 smartest wrestlers in history of pro-wrestling?

 

[Thriller Ant]

This is from your Spring Stampede 1998 review:

I have no idea why they were fighting or why Neidhart was there, but from what I can tell it was a Hart Family thing, even though Bret was legally prohibited from associating with Neidhart and Bulldog (seriously).

Is that legit? If so, what's the story behind it?

 

[Martin Gabriel]

Do you think Dean Ambrose will be the breakout star of The Shield? I don't see it, but what do you think?

 

[klunderbunker]

If you can believe Triple H against Brock, you should believe Sheamus since Sheamus was the one who put Triple H out until Wrestlemania 27.

Anyway, would you have swapped the six man tag opener at WM for any of the other matches?

Nah that was fine.

I wouldn't say that.The premise for that to be valid, Hunter, upon his return should've attacked Sheamus. He got the rub at Extreme Rules but he didn't put Hunter out til Mania 27. Logically that doesn't make sense.


Best Sheamus match?

HIAC vs. Big Show.

What would you like to see happen with the Shield?

I would say that after RAW and the likely 6-man at Extreme Rules, they will take the Tag Titles from Hell No (maybe defending them Freebird style to keep all three wrestling) but I would be more interested in them going after one of the world titles as it would be something new and in a way they are the perfect vehicle to face Cena - bullies vs the good guy with the added level of him not being able to beat them when he had two world champion partners so how can he do it against all three by himself.

Also, after just rewatching large parts of RAW, the Undertaker was the first guy I have seen to immediately look towards the correct side of the arena when the Shield's music played - a real veteran more. He knew where the camera was!

The Cena thing for sure. The tag titles are a downgrade for them.

Yep. Imagine that. Shield came from the same way they always come from.

How weird/dull/different will Wrestlemania be when Undertaker is gone?

Somewhat different but not dull.

If caffeine, nicotine and alcohol are considered drugs, then surely the THC in weed is as well. But I see your point. Semantics.

So I'm coming back onto this website and seeing these "reports" about Ryback being full blown heel and teaming with DZ next week. I still believe it's way too early to call him a full blown heel. Wouldn't it build him much better as a threat to Cena (or whoever) if he ends up getting pissed off in the match and he destroys all 3 people? Or maybe DZ and ADR get off light by escaping early and they fight down the ramp while Ryback has his way with Cena? And where does Mark Henry fit in all this? The only way he disappears entirely is if Ryback is going full heel I think.

Nevermind. Henry comes down for the DQ, DZ and ADR escape, and the 3 of them go at it in the ring with Henry coming out on top this week. I like it. Sets up a 3 way and lets Cena pin Henry, which in WWE's mind, will protect Ryback.

I think that match is going to be a dark match.

Do you see any gold on Ryback in 2013?

Actually no.

What do you think of Sheamus?

Top 3 smartest guys in history of pro-wrestling?
Top 3 smartest wrestlers in history of pro-wrestling?

Big fan.

Heenan
Cornette
Maybe Arn Anderson

Anderson
Regal
Hogan

This is from your Spring Stampede 1998 review:



Is that legit? If so, what's the story behind it?

From what I understand, yeah. It was because of Montreal. WWF didn't want WCW to try to steal the Hart Foundation.

Do you think Dean Ambrose will be the breakout star of The Shield? I don't see it, but what do you think?

No.

 

[The Fabulous Rougeau's]

If you were back in time and had the final say on Bret Hart in the WWF, would you do it the same in regards to when he went solo, or would you change it?

 

[klunderbunker]

If you were back in time and had the final say on Bret Hart in the WWF, would you do it the same in regards to when he went solo, or would you change it?

I'd do something similar. Bret not wanting to lose the title in Canada continues to look like less and less of a valid excuse every time I think about it.

 

[Martin Gabriel]

Do you think The Shield are better off as a stable not winning any titles until they all become single stars?

 

[klunderbunker]

Yeah.

 

[#MrScissorsKick]

Do you miss the Monday night wars?

 

[MrHashasheen]

Do you think TNA should have tried to go head to head with ECW/NXT instead of RAW, and how do you think the ratings battle would have gone? Also, do you think Vince's overloading of the RAW roster with stars is what started the current dip of Smackdown attendance and rating as Smackdown had too few stars to draw as they did before?