KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 435 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

In 07 when Taker when the Rumble, do you think they made the right choice of doing Batista/Taker or do you think they should have went the Cena/Taker route?
 
  • Like
Reactions: .
Nope. He's a draw.

There's a line that I love from Stan Lee: "Every comic book is someone's first." I certainly believe the same is true of wrestling shows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: .
Is it shocking to you that I became a fan of pro wrestling watching 2003 WWE? Brock is what got me interested if that helps

2003 WWE was pretty good. It was filled with WCW and ECW stars with a mix of new upcoming young wrestlers. Some of the best wrestling matches happened in 2002-2003 WWE.
 
Yeah I always hear people say how awful it was (can see it now with the Triple H reign of terror), but smackdown was my show back then.

Granted i was 12 at the time and knew nothing so its different as a kid rather than a grown fan which is how i miss viewing wrestling to be honest.
 
Nothing jumps to my mind.



Along with Mattel getting the action figure contract.

I've heard from a few different places that the Mattel deal you mentioned is a reason for the switch. How is it any different from the deal WWE had with Jakks during the Attitude Era? Why wouldn't have that deal dictated the direction of WWE programming?
 
For one year in professional wrestling, you get a re-do. You can go back in time, change storylines, kill storylines, have feuds that should have happened happen, have feuds that shouldn't have happened not happened, you name it.

Which year would it be, which company, and in as broad or as detailed strokes as you would like, how do you use your mulligan?
 
What is the best story-line in professional wrestling?

Also; who do you think has the best mind in pro-wrestling?

PWF, I don't want an answer from you.
 
For one year in professional wrestling, you get a re-do. You can go back in time, change storylines, kill storylines, have feuds that should have happened happen, have feuds that shouldn't have happened not happened, you name it.

Which year would it be, which company, and in as broad or as detailed strokes as you would like, how do you use your mulligan?

Don't make Owen Hart be Blue Blazer again. No storyline is more important than that.

What is the best story-line in professional wrestling?

Also; who do you think has the best mind in pro-wrestling?

PWF, I don't want an answer from you.

Probably the NWO. It went places no (mainstream) company had ever went and did it perfectly. At first anyway. If you mean from beginning to end, Andre vs. Hogan is way up there.

Vince used to. Now....Austin usually makes a ton of sense.
 
Regarding your review website, which shows, if any, have an A+ rating? And if there are any, which were the ones you watched live, as opposed to DVD or YouTube, etc.?
 
Mania 17 has an A+, as does One Night Stand 05. I'm sure there are more.

I've only been to Backlash 2006 live. I've been to a few TV shows I've reviewed also.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top