KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 430 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Is Rey Mysterio the best cruiserweight ever?
What, in your opinion, are his best ever matches?

Yeah. The matches with Eddie are insanely good, especially the Halloween Havoc 1997 match. Bash at the Beach 96 vs. Psychosis is great too.

What's your favorite Rock match of all time?

Summerslam 98 vs. HHH.

Do either you or the little lady own the Shawn Michaels: My Journey DVD?

She does.
 
Who is your favourite Muppet?

If an NXT wrestler was going to be called up with the character of one of the Muppets, who would you call up and which Muppet would he be?

Can weight classes ever work in American wrestling? (such as having a division for wrestlers under and over a certain weight and the top and tag titles open to all)

Would replacing one of the midcard titles for one with a gimmick be a good idea? Like say dropping the US title for one that has to be defended in falls count anywhere matches, or a less mildly ******ed variation.
 
Who is your favourite Muppet?

If an NXT wrestler was going to be called up with the character of one of the Muppets, who would you call up and which Muppet would he be?

Can weight classes ever work in American wrestling? (such as having a division for wrestlers under and over a certain weight and the top and tag titles open to all)

Would replacing one of the midcard titles for one with a gimmick be a good idea? Like say dropping the US title for one that has to be defended in falls count anywhere matches, or a less mildly ******ed variation.

Either Gonzo or Beaker/Bunsen.

Seth Rollins already reminds me of Animal at times. He's already on Raw and this is cheating, but obviously Big E. Langston as the Count (yes he's Sesame Street but they share a universe).

Given how guys like Bryan and Punk have risen to the top, having weight classes seems like a pointless idea at this point. Also Americans have a natural tendency to think lower weight classes aren't as interesting. Look at UFC and you'll see Lesnar's name on top of the list of draws.

Nah. The issue with gimmicks is that it wears out its welcome and no one cares anymore. It's what's happened with the Cell and the Chamber. Having a gimmick match every week or two would make it even worse.
 
Either Gonzo or Beaker/Bunsen.

Seth Rollins already reminds me of Animal at times. He's already on Raw and this is cheating, but obviously Big E. Langston as the Count (yes he's Sesame Street but they share a universe).

Also, weren't a lot of the Sesame Street Characters made by Henson as well?

Given how guys like Bryan and Punk have risen to the top, having weight classes seems like a pointless idea at this point. Also Americans have a natural tendency to think lower weight classes aren't as interesting. Look at UFC and you'll see Lesnar's name on top of the list of draws.

I'm inclined to agree. It would have the advantage of allowing for a rotation up at the top end of the card though. Let's say John Cena's held the open title for a while, drops it, can't get it back and goes to challenge whoever holds the HW title.

Nah. The issue with gimmicks is that it wears out its welcome and no one cares anymore. It's what's happened with the Cell and the Chamber. Having a gimmick match every week or two would make it even worse.

True, though having a champion (let's say Antonio Cesaro) have a title defended under "European Rules" while he holds it but then dropped by the next champion would be easy heat and an effecttive way to make the match stands out.
 
Favourite Kane moment?

I think that Anger Management speech. It was hilarious.

Also, weren't a lot of the Sesame Street Characters made by Henson as well?



I'm inclined to agree. It would have the advantage of allowing for a rotation up at the top end of the card though. Let's say John Cena's held the open title for a while, drops it, can't get it back and goes to challenge whoever holds the HW title.



True, though having a champion (let's say Antonio Cesaro) have a title defended under "European Rules" while he holds it but then dropped by the next champion would be easy heat and an effecttive way to make the match stands out.

Yeah they are.

Yeah it would but at the same time it would make people think "they're light heavyweights. Why should I care?"

Yeah that's true, but after that where do you go with it? Lance Storm did the same thing in WCW and afterwards it was thankfully dropped. The idea loses its weight once that first change happens.
 
Yeah it would but at the same time it would make people think "they're light heavyweights. Why should I care?"

Yeah that's true, but after that where do you go with it? Lance Storm did the same thing in WCW and afterwards it was thankfully dropped. The idea loses its weight once that first change happens.

:shrug: Make it a plot point.

:shrug: Institute a rule where the champion sets the gimmick at the start of his reign. A submission master decides to defend under submission rules, hosses in some match that benefits them being freaks of nature, high fliers in matches that lend themselves well to spotfests. "clever" heels in matches with rules seemingly tailor made to help them.
 
She does.
Could you ask if the matches from the HD era are presented in 4:3 (old school television aspect ratio) or 16:9 (widescreen)? It'd be much appreciated.

If they're shown in 4:3 rather than 16:9, does that in any way adversely affect her viewing experience?
 
:shrug: Make it a plot point.

:shrug: Institute a rule where the champion sets the gimmick at the start of his reign. A submission master decides to defend under submission rules, hosses in some match that benefits them being freaks of nature, high fliers in matches that lend themselves well to spotfests. "clever" heels in matches with rules seemingly tailor made to help them.

Seems a bit more complicated than it needs to be.

Could you ask if the matches from the HD era are presented in 4:3 (old school television aspect ratio) or 16:9 (widescreen)? It'd be much appreciated.

If they're shown in 4:3 rather than 16:9, does that in any way adversely affect her viewing experience?

She would have no idea what that means.

I've seen them in both and it doesn't bother mine for the most part.

How would you explain the wild success of a guy like GSP?

Once in awhile it'll work but most of the time it's heavyweights who dominate. Look at boxing for another good example. On occasion you'll get a guy like Pacquiao or Mayweather but they're few and far between.

Is having your ring work compared to Eddie Gilbert praise or an insult?

More of the latter than the former.
 
Bobby Roode. he's entertaining, but for the life of me I don't get the massive appeal of the guy.

I really rate Roode, as you can see from my sig. He has it all IMO


Would you like to see Boogeyman make more regular appearances on WWE TV? My friend loves the guy and says how great he is, and I keep telling him that Boogey is awful....your thoughts?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top