KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 286 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Punk likes to tweet with the lead singer of Paramore, Hayley Williams. Not that that really means anything I suppose. Both are bands with female lead singers. Can't post videos otherwise I would.
 
I don't watch much puro so I'll go with Liger. Muta is fun too. Actually scratch them both. The more Tajiri I see the more I like him so I'll go with Tajiri.

Aksana of course. No one else has looked that good in leather.
 
I used to be probably one of the biggest Tajiri marks during the late 90's and early 00's. I also absolutely love Muta and he's my current all-time favorite wrestler. It's because of him that I started getting into puro. Also, Liger is just awesome and fun to watch.
 
Would you say that the general crowd reaction to Sheamus at OLT (especially when he won) was underwhelming?
 
I used to be probably one of the biggest Tajiri marks during the late 90's and early 00's. I also absolutely love Muta and he's my current all-time favorite wrestler. It's because of him that I started getting into puro. Also, Liger is just awesome and fun to watch.

*points to name* Mine's pretty obvious.

What for your money was the greatest WHC/WWE title reign since Austin 3:16? What about just since 2000? (assuming the two answers are different)
 
No that was a few reigns later. He won his first in April 05, lost it in January when Edge cashed in, won it back at the Rumble, lost it at ONS and won it back at Unforgiven which was the year long reign. It would ahve been his third reign.

Sweet that was actually right.
 
Yeah a bit.


Why do you think that Sheamus has been getting such reactions? Since WM, his reactions have reduced. At the Rumble, he got the second biggest reaction of the night, next only to Orton.

Also, do you else feel that Cena is on a vacation of sorts since Extreme Rules. He has not had any match on RAW and at OTL he was in a 'light' match.
 
Let me preface this by saying I'm a big Sheamus fan.

Why should we care? He won the Rumble, he did nothing before Mania, he did nothing at Mania, he had a great match last month, and he hasn't really done anything since. The problem with Sheamus is he's just kind of there. We don't know anything about him other than he's Irish and likes to fight. In other words, he's a redheaded Finlay minus the leprechaun. He hasn't had any real adversity because all of the focus has been on everyone else, so why should the fans care? Wrestling is like every other form of entertainment: if you don't give us a reason to care about someone, we're not going to.
 
Let me preface this by saying I'm a big Sheamus fan.

Why should we care? He won the Rumble, he did nothing before Mania, he did nothing at Mania, he had a great match last month, and he hasn't really done anything since. The problem with Sheamus is he's just kind of there. We don't know anything about him other than he's Irish and likes to fight. In other words, he's a redheaded Finlay minus the leprechaun. He hasn't had any real adversity because all of the focus has been on everyone else, so why should the fans care? Wrestling is like every other form of entertainment: if you don't give us a reason to care about someone, we're not going to.

But. But he is the champion!!! Surely that must mean we have to care about him! :rolleyes:
 
I've been hearing people say WWE's wasting their time with Ryback since he's too similar to Goldberg and the fans won't give him a shot. What do you think?
 
Goldberg drew money. Why is being like Goldberg considered a bad thing?

*Shrug*

That's what I said, but these idiots insist that since Ryback is a Goldberg rip off he's doomed to failure. I said 'It's been over fifteen years since he's debuted and I think almost ten since he was last in a wrestling ring. They're allowed to rip off his gimmick'.
 
But. But he is the champion!!! Surely that must mean we have to care about him! :rolleyes:

I've taught you well.

I've been hearing people say WWE's wasting their time with Ryback since he's too similar to Goldberg and the fans won't give him a shot. What do you think?

It's been 8 years since Goldberg has been around. It's ok. What a lot of critics overlook is that a lot of the fans weren't around 8 years ago. They've never seen Goldberg and have no idea what they're getting here. Jim Cornette said seven years is how long you need to wait to redo an angle or a character. If you watch for more than seven years, you'll probably see some repeats. however, how many fans watch for seven years without stopping?

Goldberg drew money. Why is being like Goldberg considered a bad thing?

See above response.

*Shrug*

That's what I said, but these idiots insist that since Ryback is a Goldberg rip off he's doomed to failure. I said 'It's been over fifteen years since he's debuted and I think almost ten since he was last in a wrestling ring. They're allowed to rip off his gimmick'.

I've taught you well too.
 
I think if he and Bryan had an actual match at 'Mania, he'd be over. The fact that his winning the WHC was so controversial just buried the poor guy.
 
I think if he and Bryan had an actual match at 'Mania, he'd be over. The fact that his winning the WHC was so controversial just buried the poor guy.
 
Yeah he'd be ok. Instead of getting a hard fought win, he more or less got a cheap win like a heel would do. That doesn't help him. the Extreme Rules win helped him a lot better.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top